210 likes | 341 Views
Provincial land use management legislative processes: Reflections from the KZN PDA. Presentation at DRDLR Workshop 03 May 2013. SACN engagement with legal process. Understand practice : Examine SACN and econ hubs in 9 provinces 9 provincial reports: One cross cutting publication
E N D
Provincial land use management legislative processes: Reflections from the KZN PDA Presentation at DRDLR Workshop 03 May 2013
SACN engagement with legal process • Understand practice: Examine SACN and econ hubs in 9 provinces • 9 provincial reports: One cross cutting publication • Identify important legal issues for provincial laws • One publication important legal issues provincial laws • Respond to the SPLUMB • Reponses to the SPLUMB from SACN and some cities
Provincial legislation: why this work? • Lens to examine implications and lessons from PDAs • Learnt from its enactment and implementation • Small comparison with other provincial processes • How can we if at all deal with burning question of spatial transformation?
Overview • KZN tackled the legislative issues fairly early • KwaZulu-Natal Rationalisation of Planning and Development Laws Act, 2008 (Act No. 2 of 2008) • Town Planning Ordinance Amendment Act with the “Rationalisation” Act, to “simplify and update existing provincial planning and development laws until the PDA 2008 • Importantly, phasing towards a PDA
How they went on about it… • Some notable provisions • Wall to wall schemes • outlining of criteria for all decisions • time frames for all steps • compulsory disclosure of certain documents or facts • compulsory professional evaluation of applications and accountability • blanket removal of certain out-dated conditions of title by law
How they went on about it… • Capacity: • initiatives included drafting a manual, leaflets and process wall charts. • extensive training programmes were rolled out for councillors and municipal officials • Forums of learning and support • PDA Forum running for three years • Stretched and phased over years • Inclusive legislative process
Lessons • Merit for phased methods where: • Capacity • Little consensus • Pragmatism, adaptation, • “It is important to keep momentum. It is very easy to lose a year in an effort to please everyone. We often had to cut our losses along the way, like reducing the scope of the Act in order to make progress.
Lessons • Even with longer time for shift in powers and functions, still problems at LG • Constitutional imperative planning and LG • Municipalities have been given powers that they often are not able to manage • We have fallen victim to our own ambitions not taking into existing capacity (Adv Budlender) • Many KZN PDA provisions ambitious
Lessons • The planning status quo, in many ways is comforting, non-threatening, • “It was much easier to get consensus on extending existing legislation than to get consensus on new legislation.” • Necessity of extensive inclusivity • Like many process some room for amendments • Notice to people within 100m
Lessons • Reliance on other processes for laws successes • Create processes for sectoral land development issues eg agricultural land, environmental etc • Potential dangers of over-legislation… • set realisable goals • Postscript: numerous changes (2009) and revised bill 2012 and talk of new law
Inter-provincial comparisons • KZN PDA each lum process different chapter other provinces managed as single chapter • WC focus on IG arrangements, allocation of powers and functions • Gauteng and WC great emphasis on SDF preparation • Greater support to guide spatial transformation • SDF avenue for national and provincial interests • Registered planners (KZN and WC)
Inter-provincial comparisons • KZN and WC municipality makes decision, provincial tribunal appeals • KZN appeal tribunal solely provincial entity • Gauteng Bill municipal tribunals and single appeal tribunal, MEC appointed with LG reps • Schemes: single (WC and Gauteng) multiple (KZN) • Enforcement: KZN extensive and onerous WC and Gauteng allow for by laws
SACN and land Understandingurban land Who, where, what for, how much Interaction: builtenvironment Tools to manage land Housing and human settlements; transport Tools and levers to for urban land management Transform
A transformative agenda through the law? • Law reform intended to: • Powers and functions clarification • Replacing fragmented and racially based laws • There is a transformative agenda • Reason why LG has certain developmental functions • KZN law: Intent “redresses the historic injustices perpetuated by the old order fragmented planning and development system” • Legislation is a means to an end
There is a larger agenda • National Development Plan (NDP) • strong and efficient spatial planning system, well integrated across the spheres of government • informal settlements located on suitable, well-located land • more people living closer to their places of work, more jobs in or close to dense, urban townships and better public transport
Some legislative possibilities • Critical role SDF in driving this agenda • Provisions strengthening these • Giving planning authorities power to override “NIMBYsmeg N Cape; SPLUM • Principles decision making: Gauteng, WC • How effective given DFA experiences? • Free State incremental upgrading of informal settlements in Bill
But we should be careful • Unintended consequences • KZN PDA wall to wall schemes call for regulations to allow more leeway in the former disadvantaged areas • Applicability in rural areas • Scaling of fees • Urban edges and the cost of land
THANK YOU Michael Kihato South African Cities Network michael@sacities.net