120 likes | 292 Views
HSN Workshop 2006. 2/13. Outline. Motivation
E N D
1. HSN Workshop 2006 Hierarchical Broadcast Ring Architecture for High-speed Ethernet Network HoRang Jang and Hyong Kim
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
April 24, 2006
2. HSN Workshop 2006 2/13 Outline Motivation & Background
Ethernet Issues
Hierarchical Broadcast Ring Architecture
Discussion
Conclusion
3. HSN Workshop 2006 3/13 Goal of Network Service Providers To create more revenue with lower operational costs
More revenue
new services (e.g., video, grid computing, etc)
but, high competition
Lower operational costs
capital expenses
management costs
Ethernet network for MANs
low system cost (i.e., capital expenses)
low management cost
4. HSN Workshop 2006 4/13 Ethernet Issues for Large Area Networks Simple broadcasting & STP
broadcast storm
long convergence time
link underutilization
congestion
Flat MAC addressing
big forwarding table
Virtual LAN
same issues in one VLAN
limitation of 4094 VLANs
a lot of administrative work
5. HSN Workshop 2006 5/13 Proposed Idea Combine the advantages of IP router-based networks and Ethernet switch-based networks
Use Ethernet MAC for low system cost
Support the standard Ethernet protocols
require no cooperation of hosts
6. HSN Workshop 2006 6/13 Proposed Architecture Logical ring topology for broadcast frames
no broadcast storm
Physical topology for data frames
high link utilization
7. HSN Workshop 2006 7/13 Hierarchical Broadcast Ring Switch maintains only MAC addresses of its children, peers, and groups
Several hundred MAC addresses can represent millions of hosts
8. HSN Workshop 2006 8/13 Learning: Broadcast (ARP request)
9. HSN Workshop 2006 9/13 Data Forwarding (ARP reply)
10. HSN Workshop 2006 10/13 Discussion: potential issues & solutions The latency of broadcast frames
map the current SONET ring to the ring of groups
limit the number of switches and the length of a ring
does not affect overall application performance
the broadcast happens only at the beginning of a traffic flow
The amount of broadcast traffic
filter out unnecessary broadcasting using hierarchical Proxy ARP
increase time-out in the ARP table for frequently used hosts using an aggregation scheme of IP addresses
use high-speed Ethernet (e.g., 1GbE, 10GbE)
The size of the ARP table
reduce the number of IP addresses using the aggregation scheme
maintain only the hosts of active flows through the switch
use high-density CAM
The capacity of a single CAM chip is several million bits
11. HSN Workshop 2006 11/13 Hierarchical Proxy ARP Switch broadcasts the request ONLY to a switch or a group that the destination host belongs to
Switch replies on behalf of the destination host only when
the request is from its child
the request is from a peer and the destination is its child
the request is from another group and the destination is in the same group
Reduce broadcast traffic and prevent the persistence of old information
12. HSN Workshop 2006 12/13 Aggregation of IP addresses Provide a longer expiration time to frequently used hosts
e.g., Mail server, DNS server, File server, Data Center, etc
reduce the number of broadcast frames
Aggregate IP addresses for the same MAC address
e.g., a lot of consecutive IP addresses in a group
reduce the size of the ARP table
13. HSN Workshop 2006 13/13 Conclusion Hierarchical architecture for scalability
Broadcast ring for broadcasting
Shortest path for data forwarding
Low management cost
self-configuration
Low system cost
Ethernet MAC hardware