1 / 33

ILC Detector R&D

ILC Detector R&D. Motivated by Outstanding Physics Opportunity & Advanced Technical Challenges Global Collaboration on Detector R&D Coordination with Accelerator R&D of GDE Detector Concepts Report Planning for Detector Concepts Beyond the DCR (post 2006). ILC Physics Goals. EWSB Higgs

fayre
Download Presentation

ILC Detector R&D

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ILC Detector R&D • Motivated by Outstanding Physics Opportunity & Advanced Technical Challenges • Global Collaboration on Detector R&D • Coordination with Accelerator R&D of GDE • Detector Concepts Report • Planning for Detector Concepts Beyond the DCR (post 2006) J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  2. ILC Physics Goals • EWSB • Higgs • Mass (~50 MeV at 120 GeV) • Width • BRs (at the few% level) • Quantum Numbers (spin/parity) • Self-coupling • Strong coupling (virtual sensitivity to several TeV) • SUSY particles • Strong on sleptons and neutralinos/charginos • Extra dimensions • Sensitivity through virtual graviton • Top • Mass measured to ~ 100 MeV (threshold scan) • Yukawa coupling • W pairs • W mass J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  3. ILC Experimental Advantages Elementary interactions at known Ecm* eg. e+e- Z H * beamstrahlung manageable Democratic Cross sections eg.  (e+e -ZH) ~ 1/2 (e+e -d d) Inclusive Trigger total cross-section Highly Polarized Electron Beam ~ 80% (+ positron polarization – R&D) Exquisite vertex detection eg. Rbeampipe ~ 1 cm and hit ~ 3 mm Calorimetry with Particle Flow Precision E/E ~ 30-40%/E Advantage over hadron collider on precision meas. eg. H  c c Detector performance translates directly into effective luminosity J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  4. ILC Detector Challenges • ILC physics places premium on jet measurements and tagging, in an environment where event reconstruction is possible • tth  8 jets • hZ  2l + 2 jets, 4 jets • hhZ  2l + 4 jets, 6jets Aim to fully reconstruct final state • + SUSY, quark, τ tagging, lepton/hadron id • Vertex precision complements calorimetry • Precision tracking needed for decay-mode independent Higgs detection e e  Z H Z  l+l- H  anything Mj3-j4 vs. Mj1-j2

  5. ILC Flavor Tagging Challenge • SLD comprised 307 Mpixels with < 4 mm point resolution over entire system • ~billion pixel vertex detectors with ~3 m pt. res., and 0.1 % X0 ladders, being developed SUSY (2 Higgs Doublet Model) S. Yamashita

  6. Detector R&D Required • Performance requirements for ILC Detector exceed state-of-the-art • Calorimeters with ~100 million cells • Jet resolution goal ~ 30%/ E • Pixel Vertex Detector with ~109 20 mm pixels • Impact parameter resolution 5µm  10µm/(p sin3/2) • Tracking resolution • High Field Solenoid ~ 5 Tesla • High quality forward tracking systems • Beamline Instrumentation • R&D Essential in order to realize these capabilities in a timely way J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  7. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Global Design Effort Project LHC Physics Baseline configuration Reference Design The GDE Plan and Schedule TODAY Technical Design ILC R&D Program Bids to Host; Site Selection; International Mgmt J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  8. Possible Experiments are being Studied as Concepts GLD Current set of concepts formed beginning in 2004 4th Concept LDC http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts

  9. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Global Design Effort Project LHC Physics Baseline configuration Detector Outline Documents Reference Design The GDE Plan and Schedule TODAY Detector Concept Report (issued w/ RDR) Technical Design http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts ILC R&D Program Bids to Host; Site Selection; International Mgmt

  10. ILC Plan for Two Detectors http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/icfa/LC_parameters.pdf • ILCSC Scope Document • Scope under review • GDE IR Design • 2  20 mr recently changed to 14  14 mr • WWS Arguments for 2 IRs/Detectors • Snowmass Proceedings Active full detectors being developed: GLD LDC SiD 4th Referred to as “concepts”

  11. Case for Two Complementary Detectors • Confirmation and Scientific Redundancy • Complementarity, Collider Options • Competition • Efficiency, Reliability, Insurance • Sociology, Scientific Opportunity • Historical lessons • This will be expressed in the DCR http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0508141/proc/papers/PLEN0059.PDF

  12. Beyond the DCR • GDE plans TDR at end of 2009 • Experiments must remain on same timeline as machine  Detector TDRs ~2010 ? “synchronize” detectors with the machine • TDRs require significant resources over time • 2 years? or more? • How do we get there? • Downselect of detectors? • Authority to do this? • Intermediate step? CDR? • Discussions in WWS, with GDE and ILCSC • Possibly CDRs in 2007/8

  13. University Detector R&D in US FY06 was the fourth year of support for detector R&D from the agencies since it was first organized by the LCSGA (formerly USLCSG) and the ALCPG FY05 LCDRD fundsFY06 LCDRD funds $700,000 – DOE $1,048,000 - DOE $117,000 – NSF $ 300,000 - NSF 33 projects 26 universities/labs 25 projects 25 universities http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/fy05-awards.html http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/fy06-awards.html J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  14. U.S.LCDRD Program FY05 FY06 Topic Projects Funding Projects Funding $0.817M $1.348M DOE $0.700M DOE $1.048M NSF $0.117M NSF $ .300M LEP 5 15.7% 6 12.4% VXD 1 9.0% 4 12.5% TRK 8 32.6% 8 36.7% CAL 9 39.0% 13 42.3% PID(mu) 2 3.8% 2 5.4% no. of projects 25 33 WWS R&D Panel reviewed the scope of the global program, and noted there was effort on most topics, particle ID other than muon, and forward tracking being noteable weaknesses (we are planning to support some particle ID, and forward tracking) In general, all areas active. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  15. LCDRD – FY06 – ProjectsLEP,VXD, Tracking J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  16. LCDRD – FY06 – ProjectsCalorimetry, PID/Muons J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  17. Global Organization • World wide Study (of the Phy. & Det. for Future Lin. e+e- Colliders) http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/ • Co-chairs: H.Yamamoto, F. Richard, J. Brau • Workshops 2004 Paris 2005 Stanford 397 participants 2006 Bangalore 326 participants 2007 DESY • Coordinates ILC Detector R&D world-wide • ALCPG (American Linear Collider Physics Group) http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/alcpg/ • Regional workshops(2005 Snowmass (650), 2006 Vancouver) • Detector and Physics R&D in the Americas • Co-chairs: M. Oreglia, J. Brau • GDE • WWS co-chairs are members • R&D Board – C. Damerell (WWS R&D Panel Chair) member J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  18. WWS R&D Panel • Created by WWS, Spring 2005 • J-C.Brient, IN3P3 C.Damerell, RAL(chair)R. Frey, OREGON H.J.Kim, KYUNGPOOK W. Lohmann, DESY D.Peterson, CORNELL Y. Sugimoto, KEK T.Takeshita, SHINSHU H.Weerts, ARGONNE • Input from all R&D groups and “Concepts” • Compiled global data, analyzed for gaps • ILC Detector Research and Development Status Report and Urgent Requirements for Funding http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/R&D Report-final.pdf J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  19. Detector R&D - WWS • R&D Panel Report • http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/R&D Report-final.pdf • Urgent needs require $32M and 1870 man-years over next 3-5 years - globally • Established support over 3-5 years $15M and 1160 man-years - globally • Translating man-years to dollars ($100k/man-year) • $33M/yr established over 4 years, $22M/yr more required • Support notably behind in North America and Japan • Planning global review of R&D • With GDE R&D Board and WWS-OC

  20. FY07 University Detector R&D in US We are organizing ourselves in anticipation for increased funding in FY07 – discussed $3M with agencies (5 year R&D plan being developed by ALCPG) Encourgement led to developing a proposal early for a few (9) high priority, urgent efforts (~$1M) followed by annual round for another $2M Supplemental proposal prepared this summer 1 – call for abstracts (received 22) 2 – selection of highest priorities/urgent needs (9) http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/supplement-06a.html J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  21. FY07 U.S. LCDRD Proposal FY07 proposals will be accepted for continuing and new projects from DOE/NSF funding One year proposals (third year of 3 year cycle) Anticipated timeline December 15, 2006 – status reports and new project descriptions due May – awards announced - revised budgets/descriptions September, 2007 – funded year begins details will be posted on ALCPG web page J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  22. Test Beams • The detector R&D program will need high quality test beams over the next few years. • WWS Test Beam Panel • Surveyed community on needs and facilties • Fermilab test beam – good for hadrons • IMPORTANT Possible Special Role for SLAC • High energy electron beams • Note – requirements for detector tests different from machine • ~ 1 particle per pulse • Several projects are interested in this possibility • EM cal, tracking, vertex detectors • Could be complemented by other interests (eg. Super B) J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  23. Silicon Detector (SiD) WorkshopSLACOctober 26-28, 2006 • http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/Workshop06.asp • subsystem status and performance studies, SiD R&D plans, SiD contributions for the Detector Concept Report, SiD Conceptual Design Report, recent progress on the machine design and on ILC physics • DRAFT PROGRAM http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/Draft%20Agenda%20for%20SiD%20Workshop%20October%2026.doc • October 26 • 1:30-4:00 subgroup parallel meetings • 4:30-6:00 plenary • October 27 • 8:30-6:00 plenary/discussion • dinner • October 28 • 9:00-12:30 plenary/discussion • REGISTRATION: http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/register.asp J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  24. New weekly R&D Tele-meetings • Replaces bi-weekly LCD study group organized by SLAC • http://www-sldnt.slac.stanford.edu/nld/meetings/index.htm and Fermilab weekly ILC R&D meeting • ALCPG Physics and Detector R&D Meeting • http://ilcagenda.cern.ch/categoryDisplay.py?categId=87 • Weekly meeting to exchange results and information about ILC physics studies and detector R&D • open to everybody • organized jointly by Fermilab & SLAC • Thursdays, 11 AM PDT, 1 PM CDT J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  25. Future Meetings • SLAC October 26-28, 2006 • SiD Workshop • Valencia November, 2006 • ECFA/GDE • Beijing February, 2007 • ACFA/GDE • Hamburg June, 2007 • LCWS 2007 (joint with GDE) • Fermilab Next summer/fall • Joint GDE / ALCPG meeting J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  26. Conclusions • ILC Detector R&D urgently needed • global effort • Many opportunities to participate • New groups invited to join effort J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  27. backup J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  28. Detector Outline Documents • 4 Outline Documents were prepared in Spring 2006 leading up to the Bangalore LCWS • Contents • Description of the detector concept • Performance estimates w.r.t. physics benchmarks • Required R&D and its status • Rough costing estimate See http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts

  29. FY06 review • 36 projects for FY06 from univ. and “small” labs • $2.828 M – limited by realization of limited availability of funds • 24 continuations of efforts supported in FY05 • 12 requests for new projects. • Review teams of two or three experts looking at each of the specific topics • Executive committee of six independently reviewing all of the proposals. • Conflict of interest was considered carefully, and dealt with to avoid inappropriate influence in the review process. • Evaluation of each proposal for the following factors: RATING: overall quality of the research plan and goals, and the strength of the team to carry out the objectives (excellent, good, satisfactory, poor) RELEVANCE: the relevance of the project to the linear collider detectors (critical, important, useful, irrelevant) CONCEPTS:  the importance of the work (except for the LEP - luminosity, energy, polarization proposals) to an active linear collider detector concept (critical, important, useful, irrelevant) critical that project contributes to advancing detector technology for specific sub-detector capabilities of priority for the ILC physics program J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  30. Grannis, HEPAP. July 2006 J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  31. Global Perspective(WWS R&D Panel) US Detector R&D effort lags behind Europe Fig 1. Urgent R&D support levels over the next 3-5 years, by funding country or region. 'Established' levels are what people think they will be able to get under current conditions, and 'total required' are what they would need to establish proof-of-principle for their project. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 2006

  32. Detector Concept Report • Physics • Concepts • Based on four detector concept DOD's The goal: • We can do the ILC physics • We have different and complementary solutions • We have a clear vision on how to reach the goals (R&D) • We have some understanding on the cost for these detectors • Integrated presentation of Concepts • Case for Two Detectors/IRs

  33. Detector Concept Report • WWS has established teams of editors for the companion volume, the DCR • Physics editors - K. Moenig, A. Djouadi, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Okada, M. Oreglia, J. Lykken • Detector editors – T. Behnke, C. Damerell, J. Jaros, A. Miyamoto • Cost analysis of the concepts – M. Breidenbach, H. Maki, H. Videau – interacting with GDE Cost Board • Active during VLCWS06 http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/doku.php

More Related