1 / 32

TUE CASA Day 22 November 2006 Wiener-Hopf Solutions of Aircraft Engine Noise Models

TUE CASA Day 22 November 2006 Wiener-Hopf Solutions of Aircraft Engine Noise Models. Ahmet Demir Generalisation and Implementation of Munt’s Model. Munt’s Model.

fbickford
Download Presentation

TUE CASA Day 22 November 2006 Wiener-Hopf Solutions of Aircraft Engine Noise Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TUE CASA Day 22 November 2006Wiener-Hopf Solutions of Aircraft Engine Noise Models Ahmet Demir Generalisation and Implementation of Munt’s Model

  2. Munt’s Model • For over 25 years (1977-2003) there was “asleep” the very advanced but technically complicated solution by Munt for sound radiation from a straight hard-walled hollow duct with piecewise uniform mean flow. • It was proposed for TURNEX to take this as a starting point for similar, but extended and more advanced models.

  3. New Models based on Munt Model Case 1 : Hollow duct Case 1a : Annular duct Case 1b : Lined Centerbody Case 1c : Lined Afterbody lining lining

  4. R0 R1 R0 R1 Coplanar Exhaust and Burried Nozzle • More advanced generalisations:

  5. Analytical Solution • Solution is in the form of a complex Fourier integral (where P is also defined by a complex integral) constructed by subtle complex-functional methods, variations of the Wiener-Hopf method. • Important issues, which can now be studied more exactly : - Vortex shedding from trailing edge - Kutta condition at trailing edge - Instability of the jet (vortex sheet unstable for all frequencies; finite shear layer not)

  6. Formulation of Lined afterbody scattered field: convected wave equations

  7. Dimensionless parameters: • Incident wave (hard-walled mode): where: is axial wave number, is the root of equation

  8. hard wall boundary conditions at hub and r = 1 soft wall continuity of displacement continuity ofpressure at vortex sheet

  9. Kutta condition and instability: trailing edge behaviour, vortex shedding, excitation of instability • singular, stable • smooth, unstable • singular, unstable

  10. Fourier Integral Representation of Velocity Potentials

  11. Simultaneous Wiener-Hopf Equations (results from B.C.r=1) note : B.C. at hub yields relation between B(u) and C(u).

  12. Splitting first Equation: weak factorization in lined duct wave number note : no left running contribution in z>0

  13. Splitting second Equation: essentially with the same way:weak factorization in lined duct wave number note : no right running soft wall modes from z<0.

  14. Solution to second Equation: for far field we need only F+ Coefficients amp and bmpare determined by the following infinite linear system

  15. Complex Contour Integral • Careful management & bookkeeping of poles and other singularities is necessary for correct answer

  16. Total field (double integral: takes more time) Lined Centerbody w = 15, Mode(4,1) w = 25, Mode(4,1)

  17. Far Field • Far field pressure for ωr → ∞. directivity

  18. Numerical Examples • Case 1 with mean flow without mean flow Approach Mode(0,1)

  19. with mean flow without mean flow Approach Mode(17,1) with mean flow without mean flow Cutback Mode(23,1)

  20. Case 1a : Effect of hub (Kutta on) Approach Mode(0,1) Approach Mode(17,1)

  21. Cutback Mode(0,1) Cutback Mode(23,1)

  22. Case 1b,1c : Effect of lining and semi-lining (Kutta on) Approach Mode(0,1) Approach Mode(9,1) Approach and Cutback mean : different flows inside and outside the duct (specific parameters for the project)

  23. Cutback Mode(0,1) Cutback Mode(23,1)

  24. Comparison with numerical models • Case 1: Flesturn (METU) and Actran (FFT) results Approach parameters Modes (0,1),(10,1),(19,1)

  25. Zero flow Mode(0,1) Zero flow Mode(19,1)

  26. Case 1a : METU, NLR and FFT results Approach Mode(17,1)

  27. Cutback Mode(0,1) Cutback Mode(23,1)

  28. Case 1c : METU and FFT results (liner impedance Z = 2 - i)

  29. FFT-Actran vs TUE results

  30. R0 R1 Coplanar Exhaust : TUE and METU results Zero flow Mode(2,1) Zero flow Mode(10,1)

  31. R0 R1 Approach Mode(10,1)

  32. Conclusions • A series of non-trivial extensions of the classical Munt problem have been successfully solved and implemented. • Comparison with fully numerical solutions have been very favourable and encourages their trustful use in industrial applications. • Case 1b+1c (lined centerbody+lined afterbody) has been published: Sound Radiation from an Annular Duct with Jet Flow and a Lined Center Body, A. Demir and S.W. Rienstra, AIAA 2006-2718, 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 8-10 May 2006, Cambridge, MA, USA • First results show that lining of centerbody reduces sound field only in crosswise direction. • Effect of instability is for these high frequencies acoustically small in all cases considered

More Related