1 / 21

National Platforms Review Report and Outcomes

National Platforms Review Report and Outcomes. Methodology Online Questionnaire 60 Qualitative and Quantitative Questions 77 NP‘s, 50 Respondents Compilation of results Discussion and review with UNISDR Working Group Presentation of Draft Report during GPDRR 2013. Objectives

feivel
Download Presentation

National Platforms Review Report and Outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Platforms Review Report and Outcomes

  2. Methodology • Online Questionnaire • 60 Qualitative and Quantitative Questions • 77 NP‘s, 50 Respondents • Compilation of results • Discussion and review with UNISDR Working Group • Presentation of Draft Report during GPDRR 2013

  3. Objectives • Decision makers and DRR stakeholders better able to understand the drivers for the establishment of National Platforms. • Key challenges facing National Platforms illuminated and presented collectively to DRR decision makers and stakeholders. • The support needed to reach the objective of 168 credible and robust National Platforms by 2015, identified and articulated.

  4. Findings and Recommendations • Institutional Issues • Lack of inclusion of relevant stakeholders • Recommendations • More diverse membership • Participation of stakeholders from different sectors • Representatives from local, provincial and national level • Participation of high level political decision makers • Guidelines for civil society and private sector

  5. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 2. Lack of efficient mechanisms and processes • Recommendations • Regular meetings and reports • Development of DRR networks • Dedicated secretariat desks for each NP

  6. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 3. Unclear role and mandate, insufficient or lack of ToRs • Recommendations • NPs to be created by statutes • Guidelines for interactions with other stakeholder on different levels • NPs need to consider all aspects of Disaster Management • NPs should facilitate the development of National Strategic Plans for DRR

  7. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 4. Lack of legal foundation and institutionalization of DRR • Recommendations • Legal instruments to be endorsed by high level Governmental authority • NP‘s should be given the highest recognition at all levels

  8. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 5. Lack of funding • Recommendations • Minimal financialand technical support from UNISDR • Volunteer principles to increase effectiveness

  9. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 6. Lack of DRR and Climate Change expertise • Recommendations • Training • Sharing experiences • Promoting cooperation

  10. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 7. Lack of quantitative/ qualitative data and information • Recommendations • developing exchange protocols; • encouraged and recognized best practice through merit awards; • enhancing and organizing KM exchanges, in a more systematic manner such as twinning (city-to-city, peer-reviews); • building “virtual platforms, web-based reporting; and • establishing regional networks of National Platforms.

  11. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 8. Lack of outreach • Recommendations • Better utilization and dissemination of information • Global communication strategy • New types of outreach programs for all levels • Highlight added value of NPs • Solid bottom up outreach approach

  12. FindingsandRecommendations • Institutional Issues • 9. Lack of impact measuring and communication • Recommendations • Allocate relevant resources to measure impact • Impact need to influence national strategies and plans • Development of adequate methodologies to measure impact

  13. FindingsandRecommendations • Contextual Issues • 1. Lack of political will • Recommendations • Raising the profile of the NP at high governmental levels • Political support by key government officials • Participation of the political level in the NP

  14. FindingsandRecommendations • Contextual Issues • 2. DRR legislation needs to be improved • Recommendations • A risk management law can establish processes in public and private sectors.

  15. FindingsandRecommendations • Contextual Issues • 3. Gaps in DRR data and coordination/ exchange of information • Recommendations • Sound data, information and knowledge bases • Increase the use of the data inte national plans

  16. FindingsandRecommendations • Contextual Issues • 4. Lack of disaster prevention culture • Recommendations • More public awareness raising of DRR issues • NPs/ UNISDR to provide an overview of prevention measures

  17. FindingsandRecommendations • Mainstreaming • Mainstreaming DRR into sustainable development policy/ planning remains a challenge. • Recommendations • Development of models on how DRR can be mainstreamed in to Environment, Sustainable Development and Action Plans • Integration of DRR and MDGs • Integration of DRR into sectors of the economy

  18. FindingsandRecommendations • DRR and Climate Change • Lack of institutionalised bodies for DRR and CC • Recommendations • Integration of DRR and CC as part of the national DRR strategy • Collaboration of DRR and CC • NAPs to be used as an tool to integrate DRR and CC • Funding for demonstration projects

  19. FindingsandRecommendations • National Platforms and International Collaboration • Recommendations • National Platforms can both provide strategic guidelines for UNISDR´s agenda at the local, country and regional levels • Support of UNISDR in the adaptation of international instruments to local/national/regional conditions and realities

  20. FindingsandRecommendations • Way Forward • The implementation of disaster risk reduction is a long-term open-ended process • Recommendations • Activities related to HFA2 be coordinated by NP/ HFA focal points • Quantitative targets for NPs which allow NPs to become more active • Promotion of new risk management activities • Consolidated links between DRR, CCA and SDGs and NPs act as an forum for the links

  21. NPs are the representation of all relevant stakeholders and has legal foundation with a clear role and mandate. Sufficient financial resources are available as well as the required expertise. Political will is the precondition. • NPs have knowledge and information sharing systems in place and developed a comprehensive communication strategy targeting all levels. • NPs need to make a difference, demonstrate impact and influencing national plans and strategies. • NPs is the focal point for DRR matters and creates a prevention culture. DRR need to be mainstreamed in other sectors. • NPs and UNISDR collaborate Conclusion

More Related