450 likes | 678 Views
Vol 15. Comparison between Rasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements. Temporal evolution of Rasta observations, MIT measurements and integrated reflectivities. Parallel between evolution of Rasta observations, MIT interpolated measurements and vertical air velocity.
E N D
Comparisonbetween Rasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements
Temporal evolution of Rasta observations, MIT measurements and integratedreflectivities
Parallelbetweenevolution of Rasta observations, MIT interpolatedmeasurements and vertical air velocity
Comparisonbetweenclassicalmethod and stationnary state for linear and inverse distance interpolation methods
Multispectral approach Stationary state, inverse distance interpolation, Δt=20s
PDF of differences between observed RHIs and calculated RHIs
Frequency distribution of reflectivitiesfromRasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements ΔZ = 2 dBZ
Comparisonbetween Rasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements
Temporal evolution of Rasta observations, MIT measurements and integratedreflectivities
Parallelbetweenevolution of Rasta observations, MIT interpolatedmeasurements and vertical air velocity
Comparisonbetweenclassicalmethod and stationnary state for linear and inverse distance interpolation methods
Multispectral approach Stationary state, inverse distance interpolation, Δt=20s
PDF of differences between observed RHIs and calculated RHIs
Frequency distribution of reflectivitiesfromRasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements ΔZ = 2 dBZ
Comparisonbetween Rasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements
Temporal evolution of Rasta observations, MIT measurements and integratedreflectivities
Parallelbetweenevolution of Rasta observations, MIT interpolatedmeasurements and vertical air velocity
Comparisonbetweenclassicalmethod and stationnary state for linear and inverse distance interpolation methods
Multispectral approach Stationary state, inverse distance interpolation, Δt=20s
PDF of differences between observed RHIs and calculated RHIs
Frequency distribution of reflectivitiesfromRasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements ΔZ = 2 dBZ
Comparisonbetween Rasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements
Temporal evolution of Rasta observations, MIT measurements and integratedreflectivities
Parallelbetweenevolution of Rasta observations, MIT interpolatedmeasurements and vertical air velocity
Comparisonbetweenclassicalmethod and stationnary state for linear and inverse distance interpolation methods
Multispectral approach Stationary state, inverse distance interpolation, Δt=20s
PDF of differences between observed RHIs and calculated RHIs
Frequency distribution of reflectivities from Rasta observations and interpolated MIT measurements ΔZ = 2 dBZ