Download
1 / 14
140 likes | 287 Views
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ Year so far January 2011. AQMS 2011 (including last ¼ of 2010) Overview. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs) 36 AS9100 11 AS9110 28 AS9120 Applicant CBs 4 AS9110 Increased Surveillance Frequency 1 CB (twice per year for office assessments)
E N D
AQMS 2011 (including last ¼ of 2010) Overview Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs) • 36 AS9100 • 11 AS9110 • 28 AS9120 Applicant CBs • 4 AS9110 Increased Surveillance Frequency • 1 CB (twice per year for office assessments) • 1 CB (twice per year for AQMS witnessed audits) Suspensions • 1 Voluntary (withdrawn) • 1 nonconforming (lifted) Withdrawals • Alliance, voluntary, merged with AQA • 01 Nov 2010
Transition 9100/9110/9120:2009 • 33 Completed (in OASIS) • 3 In process • Heads Up 170, 175, 181 • All CB’s applied prior to 1 Jan 2011 (no suspensions) • Requiring transition plan information; • communications with customers, • audit day calculation process, • multiple site process
346 (Feb 2010) – Alleging a CB transferred an AS9100 certified client without following the transfer process. It was determined throughout the investigation and review of CB records that the complaint was not valid. Closed, invalid 2010 Aerospace Complaints Complaints in italics were provided previously and has no changes. Complaints in bold are new or were updated since the last meeting.
347 (Mar 2010) – An OEM issued a complaint against a CB for not closing their nonconformity(s) in a timely and appropriate fashion. Additional action was taken by ANAB and the CB took additional action. Closed, with action 2010 Aerospace Complaints Complaints in italics were provided previously and has no changes. Complaints in bold are new or were updated since the last meeting.
358 (July 2010) – An AQMS accredited CB has an arrangement with another body that include AS certification activities. The other activities of that other body are questionable and may include management system consulting. It was determined the organization was not consulting, but they were misleading in their advertising/marketing. Closed, with action 2010 Aerospace Complaints Complaints in italics were provided previously and has no changes. Complaints in bold are new or were updated since the last meeting.
364 (Oct 2010) – An OEM issued a complaint against a CB for numerous findings issued during 2010 oversight. Open, needs action (by ANAB) 2010 Aerospace Complaints Complaints in italics were provided previously and has no changes. Complaints in bold are new or were updated since the last meeting.
367 (Nov 2010) – Against ANAB An ANAB Assessor took an organization’s Manual back to the hotel to review during a WA. Closed, with action 2010 Aerospace Complaints Complaints in italics were provided previously and has no changes. Complaints in bold are new or were updated since the last meeting.
A91 – Received Dec 2010 – Open, hearing being scheduled Appealing several NCR’s from an AQMS witnessed audit Will be heard in early February ANAB Aerospace Appeals Appeals in italics were provided previously. Appeals in bold are new.
Office Assessments 41 required (5 additional) 34 confirmed 7 unscheduled Witnessed Audits 38 required (2 additional) 17 confirmed or tentative with dates 21 unscheduled 2011 ANAB Office Assessments & Witnessed Audits
Office Assessments 22 NCR’s to aerospace requirements during 42 office assessments 5 majors (2 originally minor, escalated due to timing) 140 NCR’s to ISO 17021 or general requirements during 42 office assessments 16 majors (3 originally minor, escalated due to timing) Witnessed Audits 61 (18 to AS requirements) NCR’s issued during 40witnessed audits 22 majors (9 originally minor, escalated due to timing) 2010 NCR’s (final)
