1 / 40

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES IN HYPERLINKED ENVIRONMENT

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES IN HYPERLINKED ENVIRONMENT. By Jon M. Kleinberg Presented by Moonyoung Kang. Warnings. S tatements might be strong. Argue me back. Correct me if wrong. Slides are razzle -dazzling. Keep your attention. Old tech (1998). We know the result

felicia-mcdonald
Download Presentation

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES IN HYPERLINKED ENVIRONMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES IN HYPERLINKED ENVIRONMENT By Jon M. Kleinberg Presented by Moonyoung Kang

  2. Warnings • Statements might be strong. • Argue me back. • Correct me if wrong. • Slides are razzle-dazzling. • Keep your attention.

  3. Old tech (1998) • We know the result • Presentation focus: Who won? Why?

  4. Paper talks about… Hubs & Authorities Clustering Page Similarity

  5. I will focus on… Hubs & Authorities

  6. What Instructors Want Don’t forget Ranking Nodes

  7. Hubs & Authorities In 5 slides

  8. What is “Hubs & Authorities” • Finding important & relevant nodes • Hubs (outlinks) • Authorities (inlinks)

  9. Relevance Query Seed Matching terms

  10. Outlink 1 1 1 1 Hub scores authority

  11. Inlink 1 1 1 1 Authority scores hub

  12. Stationary state Hubs & Authorities In 5 slides Converge

  13. 1998 & 2013

  14. It is a period of node-ranking war. • PAGERANK and HITS knew each other

  15. It’s 2013. Who won?

  16. What Google Scholar says… 7751 6380

  17. What People think…

  18. Why? Similar? Different? Hubs & Authorities

  19. Similarities… Iterative Adj. Matrix Eigenvector Link to Scores

  20. Easy differences… Adj.Matrix Two scores Single score Voting

  21. What Jon says… Query dep. Two-degree model Local Query indep. One-degree model Global

  22. HiTsvspagerank

  23. #1 Query dependent search = = + Is this good or bad?

  24. Variance = = High = = Low + + = = High 24

  25. #2 Local computation Fast Do you buy this? Google’s solution?

  26. Visit all nodes, eventually. In & Out links Web is connected

  27. Who’s faster to USERs?

  28. Multi-users? … …

  29. MapReduce (2004)

  30. #3 Two-degree model Do you buy this? WWW divisible into Hubs & Authorities

  31. Bipartite How Jon thinksweb looks like How web reallylooks like

  32. Conclusion • PageRank beats HITS in many ways… • REAL WORLD ≠ PAPER • Arguments may be misleading • Don’t share this presentation publicly • Jon hates this

  33. Special thanx to…

  34. Questions?

  35. END OF SLIDES

  36. A long time ago in a lab far, far away....

  37. Everybody talks about …

  38. What do YOU think?

  39. Who’s faster to USERS?

More Related