Download
1 / 15
150 likes | 162 Views
Explore how data exclusivity provisions in FTAs affect entry of originator pharmaceuticals in various markets, analyzing six scenarios and their impact on revenues. Recommendations for maximizing access and profit in pharmaceutical trade.
E N D
Data Exclusivity Provisions in Selected Free Trade Agreements: Do They Allow Originator Pharmaceutical Companies to Delay Entry in Different National Markets as Part of Life Cycle Management of Specific Pharmaceuticals? Owais Hassan Shaikh IMPRS-CI 2010 WIPO – 31.05.2012
What is Data exclusivity? • A period where a submitter of clinical trial data, submitted as part of an approval application of a new drug can preclude generics as well as national drug regulatory authority from using it to approve subsequent generic applications Why are FTAs important? • Negotiated between two or more (regional) countries • Avoid problems of ‘negative consensus’ at WTO • Circumvent the impasse in WTO Ministerial Rounds • Address the issues where TRIPS or other IP treaties are silent or ambiguous • MFN makes FTA provisions applicable to all trading partners of an FTA country 2
The other side of the coin: Access to Originator Medicine • If a Party requires or permits,... the submission of evidence of prior marketing approval (of originator’s medicine) in the other territory, the Party shall not, without the consent of a person that previously submitted the safety or efficacy information to obtain marketing approval in the other territory, authorize another to market a same or a similar product based on:... (ii) evidence of prior marketing approval in the other territory; for at least five years for pharmaceutical products from the date of marketing approval of the new product in the Party. (Art. 14.9(b) US-Bahrain FTA) • If a Party permit, ... third persons to submit evidence of prior marketing approval (of originator medicine from another territory) ... the Party shall not permit third persons, without the consent of the person who previously submitted information ..., to market the same or a similar product on the basis of ..., for at least five years, ..., from the date of marketing approval by the Party, or the other territory, whichever is late. (Art. 17.10(c) US-Australia FTA) Art 18.9.1(b) US-Korea; Art 15.10.1 US-Morocco; Article 15.9.1(b) US-Oman and Article 16.8.2 US-Singapore. 3
Six Scenarios Assumptions for the scenarios: Originator company only considers data exclusivity for making market entry; No patent or other exclusivities are pending; For originator there are no costs and revenues equal profits; ‘National exhaustion’; Once generic competition starts, increase/decrease in the market is distributed according to existing market shares; Identical market size in all parties; Drug Authorities take one year (period) to approve both medicines; Generic companies take one year (period) to come up with a bio-equivalent pharmaceutical; and Period of data exclusivity is five years in all parties.
Six Scenarios • Scenario 0: No Data Exclusivity • No data exclusivity protection in the FTA. • Simultaneous filing of originator Marketing Approval (MA) application in all parties.
Six Scenarios Scenario 1: • Data exclusivity in the FTA including preclusion on reliance on prior foreign marketing approval. • Filing of originator MA application in country A first.
Six Scenarios • Scenario 2: • Data exclusivity in the FTA including preclusion on reliance on prior foreign marketing approval. • Simultaneous filing of originator MA application in all parties.
Six Scenarios • Scenario 3: • Data exclusivity protection in the FTA but no preclusion on reliance on prior marketing approval. • Filing of originator MA application in country A first.
Six Scenarios • Scenario 4: CAFTA-DR model • Data exclusivity in the FTA including preclusion on reliance on prior foreign marketing approval. • Subsequent filings within 5 years of the earlier approval to get protection. • Filing of originator MA application in country A first.
Six Scenarios • Scenario 5: NAFTA model • Data exclusivity in the FTA including preclusion on reliance on prior foreign marketing approval. • Where approval granted on the basis of prior approval, data exclusivity periods in starts from the date of first approval.
Six Scenarios • Scenario 6: Panama-Colombia-Peru model • If a party grants approval in a specific time period, say in six or twelve months, the data exclusivity period in that party starts from the date of prior foreign marketing approval. • Where the Drug Authority takes longer, the period of data exclusivity starts a fresh in that party. • However, where the originator files after the end of its exclusivity period in the earlier party and the subsequent party’s DRA approves the application within time, data exclusivity in not available.
Findings • Scenario 2 is best for access to medicine in the presence of general data exclusivity provisions and provisions precluding reliance on foreign marketing approvals. • Scenario 2 is the most profitable as it allows originator company to enjoy periods of monopoly in all parties.
Conclusion & Recommendations • No preclusion on reliance on foreign marketing approval. • If no reliance allowed then a limiting period must be adopted in FTAs • In the presence of data exclusivity periods, it is optimal for the originator and for access to medicine that originator applies in all parties at the same time. • If possible, NAFTA-style pegging period be introduced for increased access to affordable medicine. • Centralized approval mechanism may be adopted in an FTA. • Generic pharmaceutical applications should be allowed with in the data exclusivity period and not after it ends.
