480 likes | 644 Views
Principles and Concepts of Mining Law & Policy: Trends & Challenges. Dr Elizabeth Bastida e.a.bastida@dundee.ac.uk TIRI - Governance of Oil, Gas and Mining Revenue Budapest, 26 June 2007. Outline. Mining: Some Facts Mining Law: Basic Principles and Concepts Mining Law: Some Trends…
E N D
Principles and Concepts of Mining Law & Policy: Trends & Challenges Dr Elizabeth Bastida e.a.bastida@dundee.ac.uk TIRI - Governance of Oil, Gas and Mining RevenueBudapest, 26 June 2007
Outline • Mining: Some Facts • Mining Law: Basic Principles and Concepts • Mining Law: Some Trends… • Case-Study: The Mineral Development Agreement between Liberia and Mittal Steel
Mining: The Facts
Mining: A Definition • Extraction of ‘potentially usable substances from land or sea’ (Crowson, 2005); • Mining is ‘The science, technique and business of mineral discovery and extraction’ (US Bureau of Mines, 1968); • Mining: interlinked and sequential stages. • Prospecting and exploration; • Development; • Ore extraction and processing; • Closure and remediation of site. (UNEP, 2000)
Mining: Principal Classes of Minerals • Metalliferous minerals • Energy minerals • Industrial and construction minerals • Diamonds and precious gems MMSD, 2002
Mining: Types of Processes • Surface mining: • open extraction of minerals, with removal of overlying earth and rocks to expose the ore • predominant process: 84% metallic mines; • Underground mining: • extraction by an excavation driven below the surface • Solution mining • dissolution of ores lying in deep deposits which are pumped up to the surface, • salt and potash, some uranium deposits • Water-based mining • minerals gathered in river beds, coastal waters, amenable to dredging • typically of relatively dense minerals, such as gold, diamonds, tin, titanium minerals, or zircon • Waste dump or tailings re-treatment(to work minerals previously discarded) • Crowson, 2005
Mining: Characteristics • Physical characteristics of minerals • Non-renewable nature • Site-specific • Heterogeneity: Minerals as different to petroleum resources • Needs of processing to be turned into saleable products • Very slow return of the investment • Long lead time to develop mineral deposits • Extent, rigor, and cost of pre-production activities • Capital intensive nature • Risky nature of mining investment
The Miners • Large multinational companies • operate in a wide range of countries, • select exploration and project targets on a ‘global’ basis • selling their products on regional or world markets • State-owned companies • few examples: Codelco, LKAB • Some concentrate in a few products • Medium-sized companies and national players • typically operate several small to medium-sized deposits, in one or more than one country • prevail in most locally and regionally traded minerals, particularly industrial minerals • Juniors • very dynamic in minerals exploration • some seek to negotiate a deal with larger company once discovery made; • Others will try to gain a controlling interest in the operating mine. • Small and artisanal miners • mostly concentrated in producing ‘high unit value products’ • Small operations, minor shares of global production’ • often operate ‘on the fringes of the law’ Crowson, 2005
Mining: Local Impacts • Positive facts and impacts: • a wealth-creation process; • can have a crucial role as a catalyst of development • Impacts on the environment, land and other natural resources: • the destruction of habitat, • the visual impact of an open pit or waste dump, and • the potential chemical impact of improperly treated wastes Richards, 2003 • Large-scale mining: Large infrastructure requirements. Intense consumer of energy and water for the extraction and processing stages. • Requires access to land: Interfaces with other land uses • lands owned or held publicly, privately or communally, • used for other activities or purposes, • environmentally relevant. • Potential impacts on local communities • Regional and local economic impacts: • Mineral endowment is just one form of natural capital which represents potential wealth. • Mining does not create local and regional development per se, but this has to be proactively enabled
Mining Law: Principles & Concepts
Legal, Regulatory and Contractual Framework for Minerals Development In broad terms, mineral resources investment and development at a national level are governed by a multi-layered framework of treaties, laws, regulations and contracts. • International treaties (as established under domestic legal systems) • Investment regime: Bilateral Investment Treaties – Regional treaties • Environmental protection • Constitutional provisions • Mining Code: varying approaches • Definition of ownership, allocation of functions of governmental authorities and mineral tenure regime • More comprehensive regime for minerals investment and development -with fiscal terms- • Set of laws and regulations: • Administrative law & regulation – Labour law • Environmental law, protected areas laws, forest law, water law • Health & safety regulations • Contracts
Mineral Tenure Regimes At its most basic Mining Law (in the sense of mineral tenure regimes) defines: • mineral ownership; • rules and procedures for the allocation, maintenance, transfer and termination of mineral rights; • rules and procedures for access to land; • rights and obligations of mineral rights holders.
Mineral Tenure Regimes: Access to Mineral Rights • Definition of ownership: • Most often: Definition of State ownership of minerals in the subsoil. Definition of method of access to mineral rights • Licensing or sequence of mineral titles (‘permits’, ‘licenses’, ‘leases’, ‘claims’, ‘concessions’) • Contractual approaches • Combined approaches • Definition of criteria to grant access: • Objective criteria: First-come, first-served • Subjective criteria: A selected candidate • Maintenance of mineral rights: • Work or investment obligations • Single annual fee
Mineral Rights: Types and Status – • Common provisions • Duration, renewal and relinquishment • Extension of areas • Types of mineral rights • Multi-licensing approach: Reconnaissance, exploration, exploitation, sometimes beneficiation • Single licensing approach: Covering all activities from prospecting and beyond exploitation • Status of mineral rights: • Exclusive? • Can they be sold, leased, transferred, or subject to any other agreement?, • Prior authorisation from the mining authority?
Access to Land • Definition of precedence • Rules and procedures for use of land and other resources • Rules and procedures for compensation • Dispute resolution
Environmental Regulation • Interfaces with Mining Code • Central approach: Framework environmental law + handful special mining regulations • Sectoral approach: Specific set of environmental regulations in mining law • Regulatory environmental instruments • Use of EIA • Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans • Mine closure regime • Prevention • Costs internalisation • Reclamation • Emerging approaches: • Third-party certification • Interfaces with voluntary regulation.
Agreements used in the mining industry • Mining agreements between the state and a mining company • Agreements between partners in a project: JV – JOA • Agreements used with lenders, buyers, suppliers • Agreements with landowners or landholders for access to land Otto & Cordes, The Regulation of Mineral Enterprises, 2002, 4-1.
State Mining Agreements • In general terms, a mining agreement between the government and a company comprises arrangements setting forth the rights and obligations of the parties in the course of the various stages of the project. • Various terms: • Mineral Development Agreement, Economic Development Agreements • More generally, if the company is a foreign investor: Foreign Investment Contracts, Transnational Mineral Agreements
A ‘good’ mining agreement… • ‘can stand the test of time by providing for renegotiation, stabilisation, phase-in and arbitration clauses, • Strikes a fair balance of profits between the host country and the TNC, • Precisely determines the rights and obligations of the parties… • Takes into consideration the communities or entities not party to the deal but who will be interested or affected by it’. Barberis, 22.
Best practice principles for licensing and selection Guiding principles and criteria for the licensing and selection process should be listed in the laws and applied throughout in regulations and the licensing process: • Transparency: • The tender and contracting process should be as transparent as possible. • Criteria, rules and information should be made available to all interested parties in order to create an equal field of competition; • Competition: Based on equality of competitors and adjudicated by objective criteria focusing on efficiency, technology, financing and organisation; • Economy and efficiency: To reduce unnecessary delays, risks, uncertainties and expenses; • National development and best value: Selection of the tenderer will be made on the basis of the proposal that provides the best value for the country. Criteria can include plan of work and investment; financial and technical capacity and previous experience; socio-economic benefits for the State, including commitments regarding compensation to affected communities, local employment and development, actions on environmental protection. • The promotion of Health and Safety; • The protection of the environment and nature. EU Hydrocarbons Licensing Directive: a good model of best practice
State Agreements: Types • Traditional Concession Agreements • used early 20th century, mostly in former colonies • granted ‘almost unrestricted rights’ • Service Agreements • Ownership retained by government or State company • Contractor under its supervision or control • Contract of Work (Indonesia) –hybrid form-: Company undertakes exploration and exploitation on behalf government. • Typical Mineral Development Agreements • Government ownership and control -Joint Ventures (Myanmar – Uzbekistan)- • Development issues - Upstream and downstream linkages • Investment Promotion Agreements • ‘Gap fillers’ (Otto) • Stabilisation Agreements See Otto, 2002
State Agreements: Types • To supplement or complement existing law • To expand and clarify rights, i.e. • Central Asian Republics • To strengthen certain obligations –as environmental provisions- (Mozambique). • To spell out more specific regulations, i.e. • to narrowly limit discretionary powers of government authorities; • To provide safeguards that may not be clear in the law • specific assurances needed by investment: to freeze or stabilise certain terms(Mineral Investment Agreements) • To provide a special regulatory system due to special requirements of large projects and their potential to make a substantial, strategic impact on the overall economy (Western Australia).
Agreements aimed at complementing existing law I.e., article 2 ‘Convention minière’ Niger: ‘This Convention aims to determine general, legal, financial, fiscal, economic, administrative, customs and social conditions in which the company will undertake exploration/exploitation work within the area defined in the exploration or exploitation permit’.
Agreements aimed at limiting discretionary powers of government authorities The 1998 Tanzanian Mining Act allows the Minister to enter into development agreements with the holder of, or applicant for mineral rights, regarding the conduct or the financing of mining operations under a special mining licence (section 10), ie. to: • Guarantee fiscal stability of a long term mining project, • Specify the circumstances or manner in which the Minister [or Commissioner] will exercise any discretion conferred on them by the Act; • Define the scope and, as appropriate, limit the extent of environmental obligations or liabilities of the holder of a special mining licence; • Dealing with the settlement of disputes, including provisions providing for international arbitration.
Agreements (or clauses) aimed at freezing or stabilising certain terms • Purpose stabilization clause: To protect the investor from unilateral changes by the government on the terms applicable to the project and ensure stability of regimes.
Ghana:Minerals and Mining Act , 2006 Stability agreement • (1) The Minister may as a part of a mining lease enter into a stability agreement with the holder of the mining lease, to ensure that the holder of the mining lease will not, for a period not exceeding fifteen years from the date of the agreement, • be adversely affected by a new enactment, order instrument or other action • made under a new enactment or changes to an enactment, order, instrument that existed at the time of the stability agreement, or other action taken under these that have the effect or purport to have the effect of imposing obligations upon the holder or applicant of the mining lease, and • be adversely affected by subsequent changes to • (i) the level of and payment of customs or other duties relating to the entry materials, goods, equipment and any other inputs necessary to the mining operations or project, • (ii) the level of and payment of royalties, taxes, fees and other fiscal imports, and • (iii) laws relating to exchange control, transfer of capital and dividend remittance. • (2) A stability agreement entered into under subsection (1) shall be subject to ratification by Parliament.
Ghana:Minerals and Mining Act , 2006 Development agreement • (1) The Minister on the advice of the Commission may enter into a development agreement under a mining lease with a person where the proposed investment by the person will exceed US$ five hundred million. • (2) A development agreement may contain provisions, • relating to the mineral right or operations to be conducted under the mining lease, • relating to the circumstance or manner in which the Minister will exercise a discretion conferred by or under this Act, • on stability terms as provided under section 48, • relating to environmental issues and obligations of the holder to safe-guard the environment in accordance with this Act or another enactment, and • dealing with the settlement of disputes. • (3) A development agreement is subject to ratification by Parliament. • Section 33
Liberia: Minerals and Mining Law 2000 ‘Mineral Development Agreement’ (Section 6.6 Law): • To set forth matters left to the discretionary authority of the Minister; • To fix tax obligations; • To guarantee the investor to be free from currency or other exchange controls from proceeds of export sales, and to repatriate earnings; • To agree any other terms as the Government considers conducive to the encouragement of investment, such as recourse to international arbitration, guarantee against expropriation, right to import goods and equipment for use in operations and export minerals, and protection against discrimination in favour of any other producer or exporter of minerals in Liberia.
Mining Law: Some Trends
From 1990s: Strengthening Private Investment Participation and Protection • General investment regimes: • Liberalisation of FI regimes • Emphasis in investment promotion and maintenance of stable investment climate in international conventions, regional and bilateral investment treaties • New members in ICSID • Investment incentives and taxation. • Non-discrimination to foreign capital registration • Agreements for investment protection (stabilisation) • A stable and equitable tax regime • Income tax • Non- or minimum royalties • Law reform: Attractive regimes for FI. • Role of law in creating an ‘enabling environment’ for investment; in reducing risks and ensuring returns
Trends from late 1980s… • Move to privatisation of State-owned companies • Service contracts usually entered between private companies • (see AMPLA Model Mining Services Contract, http://www.ampla.org/ampla_contract.html) • From negotiation and discretionary powers to standardised legal regimes • General move away from joint venturing and equity participation • Move from ad-hoc to model agreements • Most commonly: Reliance on general mining law –rather than on agreements • Use of agreements to provide for investment conditions • Role of private law • Deregulation - minimum transaction costs (the ‘Latin American Mining Law Model’)
1990s: The ‘Latin American Mining Law Model’ • General principles: • Ownership of State over minerals in the subsoil • Grant of rights for the exploration and exploitation of minerals (‘the concession system’) • Principle of public interest • Access to concession: By application on a first-come, first-served basis (Bolivia, Chile, Peru) • Types: Single concession (of exploration/exploitation) (Bolivia, Peru) • Term of concession: Indefinite (as long as objective requirements set out by law are met) • Maintenance of concession: By payment of a single annual fee (Bolivia, Chile; to some extent in Peru). • Procedure:Non-discretionary, non-negotiated administrative procedure • Location: By means of a grid system (‘sistema de cuadrículas’) in Bolivia and Peru. • Status of mineral rights: Real property rights – exclusive – freely transferrable, mortgageable with no need of prior approval • Combined with competitive tax regimes
…and very recently… With rise of demand and mineral prices: • Expressions of assertion of national sovereignty: • Renegotiation or redefinition of fiscal terms; • Actions to take control of unused mineral rights; • Concern for developmental dimension of mining.
Further Trends: Environmental Regulation • 1970s in developed countries (e.g. US Mine Control and Reclamation Act 1977) • General trends: Ratification of a widening circle of countries of core treaties on these subjects • Recognition of the right of every person to a healthy environment in Constitutions or environmental laws • Framework or sectoral environmental laws applicable to mining • Environmental Impact Assessment • From pollution control to more preventive approaches • Evolving mine closure regulation (Peru) • Further regulations • Main challenges for monitoring and enforcement
Social Inclusion • Right of every person to participate in the decision-making process of activities that can affect their lives • Access to information • Participation • Protection of rights and lands of indigenous peoples • Ratification of International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries (1989) • Emphasis on regulation and formalisation of small-scale mining (linked to strategies of poverty eradication and generation employment) • Major challenges for effective public participation and derive benefits for local communities
Contribution of mining to regional and local economic development • Royalties • Re-allocation of mineral revenues • Decentralisation • Establishing linkages with the rest of the economy • Major governance challenges • Management at local level • Enhancing accountability and transparency
Major Challenge • To ensure contribution of mining investment to local and regional development • Role of law and institutions in creating and maintaining an enabling environment for development
Mineral Development Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Liberia and Mittal Steel Holdings A.G. (formerly Mittal Steel Holdings N.V) Original Agreement: 17 August 2005 Amendment: 28 December 2006
The Parties • Liberia • Torn apart by 14 years civil war • Weak institutions • Rich mineral resources • Mittal Steel • The largest steel company • A vertically integrated company
The Project • Concession areas of the former Liberian American-Swedish Minerals Company (‘LAMCO’) pursuant to Mining Concession Agreement of 28 April 1960; • Concession includes port and railways
The Agreement • Agreement entered into by transitional government; • Government of elected President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf: Review of all tenders conducted by transitional government; • Renegotiation of MDA. See Global Witness Report, p. 11
Questions: Process • How were rights to develop the project awarded? • Did the transitional government have the authority to negotiate the agreement? • How was the agreement negotiated? • Was the agreement published? • Were affected communities informed and consulted?
Questions: Area, Land and Facilities • How is the area of the concession defined? Is it clearly delimited? • What are the terms and conditions to access public lands? • What are the terms and conditions to access private lands? What is the procedure if a private landowner is not willing to negotiate land access? Has mining have precedent rights over other land uses? • Does the concessionaire have rights to use assets and facilities to operate the project, such as the industrial infrastructure, the port and railway facilities? • Does the concessionaire have rights to use other natural resources for the purposes of the operation? How does it meet its energy and water requirements?
Questions: Environmental Regulation • What are the concessionaire’s obligations regarding the environment? • Does the MDA provide for mine closure? • Should an audit be conducted to clearly define liabilities of each party?
Questions: Capital and Corporate Structure • What is the concessionaire’s initial capital structure? • How is the Government’s contribution assessed? • How can the capital structure of the Concessionaire evolve pursuant to the MDA? • Which entity undertakes operations? • What are the implications?
Questions:Specific Guarantees • What is the scope of the stabilization clause provided for in the MDA?
Questions: Fiscal Terms • What is the income tax rate? • Does the MDA provide for tax exemptions? Tax holidays? • Royalties: On what basis are they calculated? How were rights to develop the project awarded? • What are the basis for the establishment of a surface rental? How is paid? (How is distributed?) • What is the treatment of import duties?