100 likes | 211 Views
Human Resource Management. Keiichiro HAMAGUCHI. Chapter 3 Section 8 Male Workers and Female Workers. (1) Women in the Japanese Employment System. Women were treated as non-regular, peripheral and ancillary workers in the traditional Japanese employment system.
E N D
Human Resource Management Keiichiro HAMAGUCHI
(1) Women in the Japanese Employment System • Women were treated as non-regular, peripheral and ancillary workers in the traditional Japanese employment system. • There were mandatory retirement for married women or earlier mandatory retirement age for women. • But female workers have steadily increased.
(2) Prohibition of Wage Discrimination against Women • Art.4 of LSL prohibits only wage discrimination “by reason of the worker being a woman.” • But women had few comparable men because they were treated differently in status, in-house training, job content and length of service. • Wage difference based on these discriminatory treatment were not regarded as prohibited wage discrimination.
(3) Case Law on Discriminatory Treatment other than Wages • Discriminatory treatment was only redressed by individual court decisions. • Mandatory retirement upon marriage (Simitomo Cement case) and mandatory retirement age at 30 for women (55 for men) (Nissan Motor case) was ruled as null and void. • But discrimination against women in collective redundancy was ruled as legal.
(4) The Equal Employment Opportunity Law of 1985 and 1997 • In order to ratify the UN Convention on elimination of discrimination against women, Japanese government enacted EEOL in 1985. • The 1985 EEOL was only “endeavor obligation law” in main HRM areas such as recruitment, hiring, assignment and promotion. • The 1997 EEOL prohibits all these discriminations.
(5) Dual Track Personnel System • Companies abandoned blatant discrimination against women. • They introduced “separate-track employment system” based on choice by workers. • General track involves routine work and no obligation to comply with transfer orders. • Career track involves discretionary work and obligation to company-wide transfers. • Given the family responsibilities, women are forced to choose the general track.
(6) Sexual Harassment • There is no provision prohibiting sexual harassment. • Women workers had sued sexual harassment case from 1990s. • 1997 EEOL introduced a provision requiring employers to pay attention this problem.
(7) Harmonization of Work and Family Life • To guarantee a substantive choice in dual track system, institutional arrangement for harmonization of work and family life are indispensable. • 1991 Child Care Leave Law provides both male and female workers with right to leave until one year birthday. • But there are very few male workers who take the leave in practice.