420 likes | 579 Views
CS 584. Dense Matrix Algorithms. There are two types of Matrices Dense (Full) Sparse We will consider matrices that are Dense Square. Mapping Matrices. How do we partition a matrix for parallel processing? There are two basic ways Striped partitioning Block partitioning. 0. 0. 1.
E N D
Dense Matrix Algorithms • There are two types of Matrices • Dense (Full) • Sparse • We will consider matrices that are • Dense • Square
Mapping Matrices • How do we partition a matrix for parallel processing? • There are two basic ways • Striped partitioning • Block partitioning
0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 Striped Partitioning P0 P0 P1 P2 P1 P3 P0 P2 P1 P2 P3 P3 Cyclic striping Block striping
Block Partitioning P0 P1 P2 P3 P0 P1 P4 P5 P6 P7 P0 P1 P2 P3 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 Cyclic checkerboard Block checkerboard
Block vs. Striped Partitioning • Scalability? • Striping is limited to n processors • Checkerboard is limited to n x n processors • Complexity? • Striping is easy • Block could introduce more dependencies
Dense Matrix Algorithms • Transposition • Matrix - Vector Multiplication • Matrix - Matrix Multiplication • Solving Systems of Linear Equations • Gaussian Elimination
Matrix Transposition • The transpose of A is AT such that AT[i,j] = A[j,i] • All elements below the diagonal move above the diagonal and vice-versa • If we assume unit time to exchange: • Transpose takes (n2 - n)/2
Transpose • Consider case where each processor has more than one element. • Hypothesis: • The transpose of the full matrix can be done by first sending the multiple element messages to their destination and then transposing the contents of the message.
æ ö 2 N ç ÷ = - + T ( P 1 ) t t ç ÷ s w P è ø One Dimensional Decomposition • Each processor "owns" black portion • To compute the owned portion of the answer, each processor requires all of A
Two Dimensional Decomposition • Requires less data per processor • Algorithm can be performed stepwise.
Broadcast an A sub- matrix to the other processors in row. Compute Rotate the B sub- matrix upwards
( ) æ ö 2 æ ö log P N ç ÷ = - + + ç ÷ T P 1 1 t t ç ÷ s w 2 P è ø è ø Algorithm Set B' = Blocal for j = 0 to sqrt(P) -2 in each row I the [(I+j) mod sqrt(P)]th task broadcasts A' = Alocal to the other tasks in the row accumulate A' * B' send B' to upward neighbor done
æ ö 2 N ç ÷ = - + T 2 P 1 t t ç ÷ s w P ø è Cannon’s Algorithm • Broadcasting a submatrix to all who need it is costly. • Suggestion: Shift both submatrices
Divide and Conquer App Apq Bpp Bpq P0 + P1 P2 + P3 x = Aqp Aqq Bqp Bqq P4 + P5 P6 + P7 P0 = App * Bpp P1 = Apq * Bpq P2 = App * Bpq P3 = Aqp * Bqq P4 = Aqp * Bpp P5 = Aqq * Bqp P6 = Aqp * Bpq P7 = Aqq * Bqq
Systems of Linear Equations • A linear equation in n variables has the form • A set of linear equations is called a system. • A solution exists for a system iff the solution satisfies all equations in the system. • Many scientific and engineering problems take this form. a0x0 + a1x1 + … + an-1xn-1 = b
Solving Systems of Equations • Many such systems are large. • Thousands of equations and unknowns a0,0x0 + a0,1x1 + … + a0,n-1xn-1 = b0 a1,0x0 + a1,1x1 + … + a1,n-1xn-1 = b1 an-1,0x0 + an-1,1x1 + … + an-1,n-1xn-1 = bn-1
Solving Systems of Equations • A linear system of equations can be represented in matrix form a0,0 a0,1 … a0,n-1 x0 b0 a1,0 a1,1 … a1,n-1 x1 b1 an-1,0 an-1,1 … an-1,n-1 xn-1 bn-1 = Ax = b
Solving Systems of Equations • Solving a system of linear equations is done in two steps: • Reduce the system to upper-triangular • Use back-substitution to find solution • These steps are performed on the system in matrix form. • Gaussian Elimination, etc.
a0,0 a0,1 … a0,n-1 x0 b0 0 a1,1 … a1,n-1 x1 b1 0 0 … an-1,n-1 xn-1 bn-1 = Solving Systems of Equations • Reduce the system to upper-triangular form • Use back-substitution
Reducing the System • Gaussian elimination systematically eliminates variable x[k] from equations k+1 to n-1. • Reduces the coefficients to zero • This is done by subtracting a appropriate multiple of the kth equation from each of the equations k+1 to n-1
Procedure GaussianElimination(A, b, y) for k = 0 to n-1 /* Division Step */ for j = k + 1 to n - 1 A[k,j] = A[k,j] / A[k,k] y[k] = b[k] / A[k,k] A[k,k] = 1 /* Elimination Step */ for i = k + 1 to n - 1 for j = k + 1 to n - 1 A[i,j] = A[i,j] - A[i,k] * A[k,j] b[i] = b[i] - A[i,k] * y[k] A[i,k] = 0 endfor endfor end
Parallelizing Gaussian Elim. • Use domain decomposition • Rowwise striping • Division step requires no communication • Elimination step requires a one-to-all broadcast for each equation. • No agglomeration • Initially map one to to each processor
Communication Analysis • Consider the algorithm step by step • Division step requires no communication • Elimination step requires one-to-all bcast • only bcast to other active processors • only bcast active elements • Final computation requires no communication.
Communication Analysis • One-to-all broadcast • log2q communications • q = n - k - 1 active processors • Message size • q active processors • q elements required T = (ts + twq)log2q
Computation Analysis • Division step • q divisions • Elimination step • q multiplications and subtractions • Assuming equal time --> 3q operations
Computation Analysis • In each step, the active processor set is reduced by one resulting in: å - 1 n = - - CompTime n k 1 = 0 k = - CompTime 3 n ( n 1 ) / 2
Can we do better? • Previous version is synchronous and parallelism is reduced at each step. • Pipeline the algorithm • Run the resulting algorithm on a linear array of processors. • Communication is nearest-neighbor • Results in O(n) steps of O(n) operations
Pipelined Gaussian Elim. • Basic assumption: A processor does not need to wait until all processors have received a value to proceed. • Algorithm • If processor p has data for other processors, send the data to processor p+1 • If processor p can do some computation using the data it has, do it. • Otherwise, wait to receive data from processor p-1
Conclusion • Using a striped partitioning method, it is natural to pipeline the Gaussian elimination algorithm to achieve best performance. • Pipelined algorithms work best on a linear array of processors. • Or something that can be linearly mapped • Would it be better to block partition? • How would it affect the algorithm?