20 likes | 168 Views
Identify laudable, culpable and non-culpable decisions. Rank culpable decisions and show how context makes some difference to how much blame a culprit deserves.
E N D
Identify laudable, culpable and non-culpable decisions. Rank culpable decisions and show how context makes some difference to how much blame a culprit deserves. 2. Outlining standard ways to place blame and respond to it, interpret any defensive utterances by the culprits (and by their supporters); and interpret their critics’ (and victims’) utterances.
3. Evaluate the use of standard normative doctrines to assess the conduct and attitudes on show in this case. Consider whether business should be exempt from such normative appraisal. 4. In relation to this and comparable cases, if standard ethical norms were not enough to protect victims of corporate misconduct, recommend something that might have protected them.