310 likes | 429 Views
Chip Rainey Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana, Suite 1800 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 374-3529 Austin Number: (512) 485-3143 raineyc@gtlaw.com. Gil Rudolph Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P. 2375 East Camelback Road Suite 700 Phoenix, AZ 85016 (602) 445-8206 rudolphg@gtlaw.com.
E N D
Chip Rainey Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana, Suite 1800 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 374-3529 Austin Number: (512) 485-3143 raineyc@gtlaw.com Gil Rudolph Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P. 2375 East Camelback Road Suite 700 Phoenix, AZ 85016 (602) 445-8206 rudolphg@gtlaw.com E-Commerce and Micro Lending
Agenda • Contract Formation • Attribution and Authorization Issues • Strategies for Showing Assent • Making Required Disclosures to Consumers Electronically • Keep Records to prove Assent • Put Strategies to use – examples
Attribution • The effect of attribution or authentication of an electronic signature to a particular party is determined, just as in the physical world, from the context and surrounding circumstances (including agreed-upon security procedures) at the time of creation, execution or adoption of the signature.
Attribution – New Customers • Much harder since no shared secrets • New technologies are not widely used • PKI • Biometrics • How do you verify identity? • Good guidance provided by U.S. Dept. of Ed., Standards for Electronic Signatures in Electronic Student Loan Transactions.
AttributionNew Customers • Once a new borrower is authenticated, then subsequent communications may be attributed to that borrower by use of PIN or other credential, together with other secret information. • The issuance of PIN or other credential must be via secure online session, or USPS, and not be email sent in the open • Before issuing PIN or credential to a new borrower coming over the Internet, confirm identity by at least 2 data matching sources from the following resources: • National credit bureau • Commercially available databases • State motor vehicle agencies • Government databases • At a minimum, verify borrower’s name, social security number, driver’s license number and date of birth.
Attribution – New Customers • Verify information given by customer • Check public databases of phone numbers, addresses and credit reports • Authentication Service Bureau • Provides authentication services on an outsource basis • Drivers license can be verified
Attribution – Existing Customers • Much easier since you have existing customer information to verify customer • PIN/Password • Shared Secret • IRS e-file requires prior year Adjusted Gross Income, SS # and birthday • Amount of last month’s bill
Strategies for Assent • Case law is still relatively sparse, but trends are emerging • Goal: Avoid disputes on validity of assent • The Strategies incorporate the requirements of Federal E-Sign Act and UETA
Determine the Law That Applies • ESIGN, passed in 2000, was designed to add uniformity and was based upon the Model Version of UETA • But ESIGN provides for a reverse preemption • ESIGN specifically does not apply to: • UCC, other than Art. 2 and 2A • Tape recordings of oral conversations
UETA, ESIGN and Notes • Does not apply, generally, to UCC Article 3 (negotiable instruments) -- but should apply to notes not subject to Article 3. • Does apply, under UETA, if the borrower expressly consents that the electronic note is a “Transferable Record.” • ESIGN only applies to loans that are covered by UCC if a “transferable record” and secured by real estate. • Also, should apply to a CSO contract, which is a separate agreement from the note.
What is a “Transferable Record” • This is an electronic record that purports to be a note (i.e. a promise by the borrower to pay a sum certain), and to which the borrower has specifically consented may be transferred to a new holder electronically. There must be only a single, verifiable copy of this record. UETA Sec. 16. • Note that a consumer’s consent to receive electronic records and notices is non-transferable, so the new holder must secure a separate consent.
FRB Requirements For Electronic Disclosures • Although similar language is found in most FRB regulations, Reg E provides a concise statement as to requirements before using electronic means to make disclosures
FRB Requirements For Electronic Disclosures “ (c) [Persons] that uses electronic communication …shall: “(1) Send the disclosure to the consumer's electronic address; or “(2) Make the disclosure available at … an Internet web site; and “(i) Alert the consumer of the disclosure's availability by sending a notice to the consumer's electronic address [or physical address]… The notice shall identify the account involved and the address of the Internet web site or other location where the disclosure is available; and “(ii) Make the disclosure available for at least 90 days … “(d) Redelivery. When a disclosure provided by electronic communication is returned … undelivered, the [person] shall take reasonable steps to attempt redelivery using information in its files.
Consent to Receive Electronic Disclosures • Both ESIGN and UETA are opt-in statutes • No party can be forced to conduct business electronically or to receive notices electronically • Unlike ESIGN, UETA permits implied consent. But UETA can not preempt ESIGN with respect to disclosures to consumers. ESIGN Sec. 101(c)(1).
Opportunity to Review Terms • Viewing of Terms before Assent • No assent allowed before Viewer has opportunity to review terms • Means of assent at end of terms, with scroll-through required • Assent before Access to Website or other Services • No access before assent given • No “deep-linking” to bypass Terms and Assent process
Opportunity to Review Terms • Ease of Viewing Terms • No pop-up windows that disappear • Continued Ability to View Terms • Must be able to print or download • Terms accessible elsewhere on site • Viewer must be able to reread the agreement if they want
Display of Terms • Format and Content • Must comply with laws on notice, disclosure, conspicuousness, etc. • No fine print • Consistency with Information Elsewhere • FAQ, etc should not contradict
Acceptance or Rejection of Terms • Choice Between Assent or Rejection • Clear Words of Assent or Rejection • Clear: “I Agree” or “Yes” • Unclear: “Continue” or “Next Page” • Clear Method of Assent or Rejection
Acceptance or Rejection of Terms • Consequences of Assent or Rejection • No access to site w/o assent • Registration should stop • Notice of Consequences of Assent or Rejection • Example: “By clicking “Yes” below, you will be legally bound…”
Opportunity to Correct Errors • Correction Process • To detect and correct errors • Example: Provide summary of online application or registration information
Keep Records to Prove Assent • Accurate Records of Terms and Process • Maintain records of version of Terms • Maintain records of assent process • Need your webmaster to understand the need to reproduce earlier versions of the website
Keep Records to Prove Assent • Retention and Enforceability • User must be able to print or download • Accuracy and Accessibility after the Assent Process • If law requires records to be kept, then keep electronic records
Amendments to Terms • What is needed? • Need notice and assent again • Pop-up window upon log-in • E-mail notice with delayed effectiveness • “Negative” assent commonly used (i.e., if you do not object, then….”)