Use of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications

1. Use of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications Murat Tunç 110020209

2. Use of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications There are many forestry applications that remote sensing can be used for. Some of these applications include terrain analysis, forest management, recultivation, updating of existing forest inventories, forest cover type discrimination, the delineation of burned areas, and mapping of cleared areas.

3. Unsupervised Classification An unsupervised classification can be performed without any ground reference information. This was evaluated, while the ground reference data was being collected, by having a general sense of the area supplemented with DOQQs. Each unsupervised classification was created through Erdas Imagine using the isodata algorithm. The unsupervised classification was first seperated into 10 classes and an analyst would group the classes into hardwood, softwood, mixed forest (when applicable), open field and water.

4. Image Type:Landsat ETM+ Path/Row:14/29 (subset) Aquisition Date:July 21, 1999 Location:Adirondacks, New York Examples of Unsupervised Application

5. Unsupervised Classification defining 12 original clusters: • Overall accuracy is relatively low at 54%, as mixed is often falsely classified in the hardwood, softwood and open classes. Hardwood is also often falsely classified in as mixed further reducing overall accuracy as there are limited blocks of solid hardwood. This accuracy reflects relatively simple analysis on the part of an analyst. Accuracy can be increased with more effort from a skilled analyst.

6. Unsupervised Classification defining 26 classes: • Increasing the number of classes defined in the unsupervised classification decrease the number of signatures that have to be forced into an individual category as the spectral range for each class increases. The overall accuracy increase between the 12 and 26 class is due to the reduction in discrepancies between mixed and softwood and hardwood. In the unsupervised 26 class classified image the salt and pepper effect for mixed is greatly reduced, illustrating larger blocks of solid hardwood.

7. Supervised Classification Each supervised classification used the ground reference plots for training data for the hardwood, softwood and mixed classes. For water and open field classes, DOQQ and other higher resolution imagery was used for training. Erdas Imagine was used to create each supervised classification using the maximum likelihood parametric rule.

8. Examples of Supervised Application • Image Type:Landsat ETM+ • Path/Row:14/29 (subset) • Aquisition Date:July 21, 1999 • Location:Adirondacks, New York

9. Supervised Classification with mixed forest class: • Confusion occurs during classification between the mixed class and the softwood and hardwood classes as almost all references have some degree of mixed wood. Some of the open areas (fields and shrub areas) carry the same spectral response as hardwood, decreasing accuracy

10. Supervised Classification without mixed forest class: Overall accuracy increased by 11% with the removal of mixed (varying percentages of softwood and hardwood) falsely being classified by the dominate forest type

11. Buffering the ground reference data to a 45 meter radius, roughly equaling a 3X3 pixel group on a 30 meter resolution image, increasing the reference data used for classification: Supervised Classification with mixed forest class: Buffering the ground reference samples to 45 meters increased each reference from 1 to 9 pixels increasing reference sample sized used in classification. Overall accuracy increases 7% from the unbuffered mixed classification as some of the single cells mixed classes were removes from hardwood.

12. Supervised Classification without mixed forest class: Overall accuracy was greatest in the buffered no mixed wood classification. Accuracy increased with the removal of mixed, which was often confused with hardwood and softwood.

13. Guided Clustering Guided clustering is a hybrid of both unsupervised and supervised classification techniques. An unsupervised classification was performed only on the ground reference plots that correspond to each specific class. Therefore, for each class, an unsupervised classification was created. The signature from the unsupervised classifications was used as training for the supervised classification.

14. Examples of Guided Clustering Image Type:Landsat ETM+ Path/Row:15/30 (subset) Aquisition Date:July 28, 1999 Location:Central, New York

15. Guided Clustering Classification with mixed forest class: Some of the open class signatures used in classification were similar to those of the different forest classes, lowering the user's accuracy for the open class. The mixed forest type is spread throughout the hard and softwood categories in a salt and pepper effect, reducing the ability of the classifier to delineate hard and softwood classes. This is represented in the error matrix as the fact that mixed is often misclassified in both the hard and softwood categories.

16. Guided Clustering Classification without mixed forest class:

17. Guided Clustering Classification using a majority filter with mixed forest class: Using a majority filter in the post processing procedures greatly reduced the salt and pepper effect of the mixed class while smoothing the remaining classes. Softwood was still often missclassed in the mixed category as the majority of the mixed surrounds the softwood. Many of the softwood reference plots are near the edges of the softwood stands which may have caused them to be misclassified under mixed.

18. Guided Clustering Classification using a majority filter without mixed forest class: Removing the mixed class and performing a majority filter in the post processing procedures resulted in an overall accuracy of 88% the best accuracy achieved using the guided clustering method. The removal of the mixed class and smoothing of each class greatly reduced the false classification that may have been due to reference samples near the edge of landcover types or references in areas of uncertainty (mixed).

19. Some Examples of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications

20. This is a color composite image of Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia using Landsat TM bands 5,4 and 3. (A) appears dark green because this is a mature area of forest with no cut, (B) appears bright pink because this is area that has been clear cut or recently logged and (C) appears bright green because these are areas that have been clear cut but have started regrowth.

21. Applications of Remote Sensing for Forest Fires in Poland • For several years the number of fires in European forests has increased. In the case of Polish forests, a new category of forest fire risk has appeared in some regions. Forest fires are a result of the simultaneous existence of at least three unfavourable phenomena: long- term drought, the effect of air pollution (decline and decay of trees, the formation of loose canopy and lush growth of grasses - all resulting in large amounts of inflammable material) and high tourist presence in forests. Because of this situation, the Polish Forest Service has started to apply new techniques and technologies for forest protection: satellite data and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). • High resolution satellite data such as Landsat Thematic Mapper, SPOT and ERS-SAR combined with low resolution satellite images such as NOAA-AVHRR offer new possibilities to monitor forest fires. They have a number of advantages over conventional means of observation: Using satellite images, it is possible to view vast expanses of land (thousands to tens of thousands of km2 on one image). This can be performed regularly for the same area and recorded in different wavelengths, thus providing information on the state of forest resources. Satellite data can be acquired without encountering administrative restrictions • GIS may be useful in immediately finding the most direct access to endangered areas and in locating water sources

23. After locating the fire on the digital forest, the parameters and description of endangered forest stands are displayed, which facilitates fire fighting interventions

24. Burnt area seen on SPOT (black) and ERS-SAR (light green) images. Multitemporal images (in this case ERS-SAR) allow monitoring of recultivation

25. Changes in Forest Land after Hurricane Hugo

26. After classifying the before and after Landsat TM images into thematic land cover consisting of Water, Forest, and Bare Soil, differences between the classified images are calculated to arrive at an assessment of change. Red depicts areas that were forested and are bare soil; Blue depicts water and wetlands; Green depicts forests not significantly affected by the hurricane.

27. Conclusion: • We can see that remote sensing in forestry is very important. Because we can see the places that are damaged by people, or the places that are cut from the space; and you can get these images when the satellite is passing above your region. • You can understand where there is a fire, how big the fire is or where the fire is going to without going to that place, and you can take precautions immediately. • For example after a hurricane or disasters, the damages on forests can be understood in a very short time, and the places where regrowth must be made can be seen from above.

28. References: • http://www.fao.org/sd/EIdirect/EIre0074.htm • http://www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/%7Esmerino/ • http://forest.esf.edu/technicalAnalysis.html • http://www.emporia.edu/earthsci/student/talk2/forestry1text.htm