1 / 10

International Business Law & Institutions Sol Picciotto Topic 1: From GATT to WTO

Law School. International Business Law & Institutions Sol Picciotto Topic 1: From GATT to WTO. Trade Organization or Government of Global Economy? Package of agreements, enforced by DS with (trade) sanctions Legal-Technocratic procedures Emphasis on liberalisation = market access

fergal
Download Presentation

International Business Law & Institutions Sol Picciotto Topic 1: From GATT to WTO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Law School International Business Law & Institutions Sol Picciotto Topic 1: From GATT to WTO Trade Organization or Government of Global Economy? Package of agreements, enforced by DS with (trade) sanctions Legal-Technocratic procedures Emphasis on liberalisation = market access `Non-tariff barriers’ = regulatory differences – need to harmonise? Linkages: disciplines on state rules, to conform to international standards SPS & TBT >>> technical & health standards (ISO, Codex) TRIMS & GATS >>> investment regulation TRIPS >>> WIPO & investment New `Singapore’ issues? competition; investment; environment; labour standards. IBLI Topic 1

  2. The Legacy of Bretton Woods IMF - IBRD (WB) - [ITO] > GATT ITO: incl. provisions on Commodity Agreements, Cartels General Agreement on Tariffs & Trade - GATT 1947 Protocol of Provisional Application: not Organization Contracting Parties (= GATT Council) take decisions Negotiating Rounds GATT Uruguay Round (UR) negotiations 1987-1993 WTO, Marrakesh Agreement 1994 in force 1/1/95 4/04/03 146 members (incl. China, not Russia) 500 staff, 2003 budget SwFr154m IBLI Topic 1

  3. The WTO Package Annex IA: Trade in Goods: GATT 1994 = GATT 1947 + Understandings + UR Protocol Schedules, + 12 Side Agreements (incl. Agric., Textiles) Annex IB: General Agreement on Trade in Services - GATS Annex IC: Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights - TRIPS Annex II: Dispute-Settlement Understanding - DSU Annex III: Trade Policy Review Mechanism - TPRM Annex IV:Plurilateral Agreements (optional) Civil Aircraft, Govt Procurement (25% of WTO members) [Bovine Meat, Dairy ended 1997] + Ministerial Decisions & Declarations IBLI Topic 1

  4. Organizational Structure: chart Decisions: by Consensus if possible (`Green Room’) otherwise: 1 vote per state (incl. all EU MS) Interpretations: MinConf/GC: 75% majority new agreements/accessions: Consensus (package deals) Ministerial Conference Singapore 1996; Geneva 1998; Seattle 12/1999, Doha 11/ 2001, Cancun 09/2003 General Council (& DSB, TPRM) Committees: Environment, Development; WG Investment, etc Councils: Goods, Services, TRIPS Committees: Agriculture, SPS, TBT, etc Trade Negotiations Committee IBLI Topic 1

  5. Basic Principles of the GATT Non-discrimination: (i) MFN- art.I: multilateral & unconditional `any advantage granted’ to ANY state must be extended to CP Non-discrimination: (ii) NT - art III taxes and other regulations affecting products `no less favourable’ than that for products of national origin Elimination of Quantitative Restrictions - art. XI no prohibitions or other restrictions on imports or exports by quotas, licences or other measures (total prohibition?) General Obligations subject to Exceptions, esp. art XX IBLI Topic 1

  6. Tariffication & Trade Liberalisation No quotas, tariffs locked in, downward ratchet MFN = concession automatically generalised to all MS Equivalent concessions? reciprocity/free-riding Special & Differentiated Treatment for LDCs Art. II - Tariff Schedules `bindings’ `grandfathering’ margin of preference Negotiating Rounds (8) especially 1960-62 Dillon : item-by-item 1962-67 Kennedy: linear, aim 50% overall, exceptions 1973-79 Tokyo: algebraic (for disparities) + NTBs 1986-93 Uruguay: > comprehensive undertaking Tariffs on manufactures average 40% 1948 > 5% 1995 IBLI Topic 1

  7. Exceptions art. VI Anti-Dumping goods sold at undervalue (=below home price) MAY impose duty, no greater than dumping margin art. VI Countervailing Duties no greater than export subsidy art. XII Balance-of-Payments art. XIX: Safeguards art. XXIV: regional FTA or Customs Union: bilateral? art. XX General Exceptions list, subject to general `chapeau’ art. XXI Security IBLI Topic 1

  8. Dispute-Settlement - GATT - WTO Aim: (i) to resolve disputes consultations (XXII.1, DSU 4), mediation (DSU 5) arbitration (DSU 25) - for facts, expert group DSU 13.2 (ii) enforce compliance: right to retorsion (compensation) (iii) ensure Balance of Commitments maintained art. XXIII Nullification/Impairment OR Objective of Agreement impeded, BY (i) failure to carry out obligation (=violation) (ii) application of a measure (=non-violation) (iii) any other situation IBLI Topic 1

  9. WTO: Legalisation of Dispute Settlement All `covered agreements’ + special rules DSU 1.2 cross-retaliation: DSU 22.3, Bananas Automatic Adoption of Reports: DSU 16.4, 14 Timetable (12 months max) Remedies: DSU 3.7 withdrawal of inconsistent measures (if violation) within reasonable time: DSU 21.3 disagreement on consistency > original Panel: DSU 21.5 Compensation/Suspension of Concessions: temporary, if withdrawal impractical Authorised discriminatory Suspension of concessions: DSU 22 (level subject to Arbitration, winner decides areas and timing) Cross-retaliation: DSU 22.3 IBLI Topic 1

  10. Rule of Law in trade: DSU 3.2 World Court of Economic Justice? AB: members fixed term (part-time) Panelists ad hoc end of unilateralism? US Trade Act 301 Panel report mutually agreed solutions referred to DSB: DSU 3.6 standing & 3rd parties: DSU 3.3&7, US in Bananas amicus curiae briefs? Asbestos et al DS rulings don’t change MS rights/obligations: DSU 3.2&4 Only GC/MinConf can make Interpretations: WTO IX.2 AB formalist reasoning: international law & Vienna C. Reports not precedents but part of acquis: Japan Taxes IBLI Topic 1

More Related