1 / 8

What Does This Mean? What Should We Do?

What Does This Mean? What Should We Do?. IANAPLAN at IETF90. Stuff requested. Policy RFC 5226, RFC 6220 (?) Implementation RFC 2850, RFC 5226, RFC 6220, current registries, MoU & adjustments Oversight By IAB, per RFC 2850, RFC 2860, RFC RFC 6220, and the MoUs. Stuff requested (2).

fergus
Download Presentation

What Does This Mean? What Should We Do?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What Does This Mean?What Should We Do? IANAPLAN at IETF90 IETF 90

  2. Stuff requested • Policy • RFC 5226, RFC 6220 (?) • Implementation • RFC 2850, RFC 5226, RFC 6220, current registries, MoU & adjustments • Oversight • By IAB, per RFC 2850, RFC 2860, RFC RFC 6220, and the MoUs IETF 90

  3. Stuff requested (2) • Accountability • Implementation failures: mechanisms specified in MoUs (includes, in worst case, replace operator) • Policy failures: RFC 3777 and updates IETF 90

  4. A suggestion • Stability says to change as little as possible at one time • The contractual structure is changing • Nothing about the arrangement between IANA operator and us needs to change • Therefore, document current state and do nothing else IETF 90

  5. Have we done everything? Is there actually anything else we need to add? IETF 90

  6. IANAPLAN at IETF90 Proposed Charter IETF 90

  7. Content of charter • Are there things that are missing? • Are there things that should be removed? • Do we need a WG? IETF 90

  8. WG? • Do you think there is a real problem here? • If yes, do you understand the problem? • Do you think we can do this work? • Are you personally willing to do work? IETF 90

More Related