90 likes | 174 Views
Relatedness = recency of common ancestry. You are more closely related to your first cousins than your second cousins because…. You are more closely related to a chimpanzee than to a worm because…. grandparents vs. great-grandparents ≈ 6 Million years ago (Ma) vs. ≈ 600 Ma.
E N D
Relatedness = recency of common ancestry • You are more closely related to your first cousins than your second cousins because…. • You are more closely related to a chimpanzee than to a worm because…. • grandparents vs. great-grandparents • ≈ 6 Million years ago (Ma) vs. ≈ 600 Ma
Why might you go wrong?If you look “along” the top Human Trout Frog Lizard Mouse • But this is not how evolution happened • All these species are alive today: A living trout is not an ancestor of a frog • The order “along the top” can change without changing the content of the tree
Fish Fish Frog Lizard Mouse Human Human Mouse Lizard Frog You can change the order without changing the tree
On this tree, is a frog more closely related to a trout or a human? Trout Human Mouse Lizard Frog -> The same tree depicts the same relationships
Is a gibbon more closely related to a human or a macaque? Don’t be distracted by similarity
Non-monophyletic group Some members are more closely related to organisms outside the group Monophyletic group (clade) Members are more closely related to each other than to any organisms outside the group
Biological classifications should reflect evolutionary relationships • They should mirror phylogenetic trees • Only clades should be named • Most named groups you know of are clades • But there are a few exceptions: Fish, invertebrata, reptiles, protista, prokaryota