1 / 11

JUDr. Radim Pol čák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.cz ICQ: 217-486-919

Data Protection Paradoxes: A Pragmatical Overview of Recent Experience. Radim Polčák Masaryk University, Faculty of Law Workgroup for Law and ICT. JUDr. Radim Pol čák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.cz ICQ: 217-486-919. Aims of law – doing good. Fairness Certainty Welfare.

feryal
Download Presentation

JUDr. Radim Pol čák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.cz ICQ: 217-486-919

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Protection Paradoxes: A PragmaticalOverview of Recent Experience Radim Polčák Masaryk University, Faculty of Law Workgroup for Law and ICT JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  2. Aims of law – doing good Fairness Certainty Welfare JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  3. Aims of law – doing good The law should regulate in certain areas of culture—but it should regulate culture only where that regulation does good. Yet lawyers rarely test their power, or the power they promote, against this simple pragmatic question: “Will it do good?”When challenged about the expanding reach of the law, the lawyer answers, “Why not?” We should ask, “Why?” Show me why your regulation of culture is needed. Show me how it does good. And until you can show me both, keep your lawyers away. JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  4. Example Radim Polčák Nerudova 14 Brno Thumb length: 58 mm No material corrective JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  5. Paradox 1 - potential Privacy, personality, discretion Distributive (rights) Individual Material Data protection General Objective, absolute Formal JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  6. Paradox 2 - procedure Procedure (law) Ex officio Investigation System Procedure - reality On announcement Passive gathering of evidence Uncoordinated JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  7. Paradox 3 – axioms and interpretation Personal data, sensitive data Rigid, formal criteria Objective interpretation Equality Interpretation Pragmatism Purposive interpretation Restrictiveness (no appeal) JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  8. Paradox 4 – effects Teleology Comfort (individual) Consumer protection Competitive advantage Practice Fear Obstructions (consent) Restricted services Competitive disadvantage JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  9. Example JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  10. Visions Material test (subjective element) Legislative safeguards (abstract terms) Specific regards to social and economical factors Institutional unification (government) Uncertainty, diversity (short run) ? Tort (+ ombudsmen, class actions) Purposive interpretation (actual teleology) Certainty Fairness Welfare JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

  11. … thank you for your attention JUDr. Radim Polčák, Ph.D. radim.polcak@law.muni.czICQ: 217-486-919

More Related