1 / 9

PHMSA HMEP Grant Program ~ HMEP Grant Application Trends

This comprehensive guide outlines the 2011-2012 Hazmat Grant Application trends and requirements, focusing on key areas such as program goals, budget narrative, personnel, and evaluation criteria. Ensure your application is thorough and effective by following this detailed resource.

fford
Download Presentation

PHMSA HMEP Grant Program ~ HMEP Grant Application Trends

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PHMSAHMEP Grant Program~HMEP Grant Application Trends NASTTPO Annual Conference October 2011

  2. Hazmat Grant Application • Forms • Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) • Budget for Non-Construction Programs (SF-424A) • Assurances for Non-Construction Programs (SF-424B) • Combined Assurances (ED-80-0013) • Narrative • Agency Identification • Transportation Fees • Contact Information • Report of Progress • Program Goals and Objectives • Statement of Work for Upcoming Budget Period • SERC/LEPC Involvement • Supplies and Equipment

  3. 2011 – 2012 Application Summary • This year, we are recommending that grantees place additional emphasis on the following sections: • Program Goals and Objectives • List goals/objectives of training and planning activities and how they tie into program goals/objectives • Statement of Work • Statement of proposed activities or deliverables • Number of proposed activities or deliverables • Schedule of implementation • Budget Narrative • We are also clarifying that the Report of Progress information may be provided through Quarterly and Final Reports, rather than as a narrative within the application.

  4. Hazmat Grant Application PreparationRequirements & Expectations • a. Personnel • - Staff positions by title • Annual salary • Job title • Role in HMEP grant • Total cost for budget period Budget Narrative • b. Fringe Benefits • If included as Direct Cost: • Percentage used (fringe benefit rate) • Basis for computation of rate • If addressed as Indirect Cost: • Do not include amounts for fringe benefits • c. Travel • Local Travel: • Estimate of aggregate costs • Mileage reimbursement rate • Reasons for travel • Non-Local Travel: • Estimated # of trips • Purpose and programmatic need • Location and estimated costs • d. Equipment • Identify equipment that: • is tangible • is non-expendable personal property • has an estimated cost of $5,000+/unit • has a useful life of more than 1 year • will be used during proposed planning • or training activities • e. Supplies • (tangible property other than “Equipment”) • Identify categories of supplies to be procured • which will be used during proposed planning or • training activities • Identify “sensitive” items (laptops, GPSs, etc.) • and associated cost/unit • f. Contractual • Anticipated expenditures for services/analyses or • consultants • Specify purpose and estimated cost h. Other - Provide detailed information on other subgrants, Insurance, space rental, printing, publication, Postage, utilities, telephone, rental of equipment and supplies, and activities not covered under other budget categories. • j. Indirect Charges • Identify cognizant federal agency for negotiation of • indirect cost rate • - State approved indirect rate • Provide copy of most recent negotiated agreement

  5. 2011-2012 HMEP Application Evaluation Criteria • Agency/State goals and objectives identified? • SF-424A budget substantiated in the narrative? • Matching detailed? • Object Class Category correctly used? • Personnel costs charged to the program? • Indirect costs passed through to the program? • Planning/Training SOWs included? • Project costs allowable, reasonable, feasible? • Subgrant schedules Provided?

  6. Program Vulnerabilities • Agency/State goals and objectives identified? • Misaligned objectives enable unallowable expenses • SF-424A budget substantiated in the narrative? • Undisclosed activities enable unallowable activities • Matching details? • Lack of clarification on how match will be met may result in rushed and incorrect accounting.

  7. Program Vulnerabilities • Object Class Category correctly used? • Incorrect categorization enables mishandling of expenses or may cause post-award audit triggers • Personnel costs charged to the program? • Undisclosed activities enable unallowable activities • Indirect costs passed through to the program? • Lack of supporting documentation/clarity on inclusions can result in duplicate expenses for HMEP

  8. Program Vulnerabilities • Planning SOWs included? • Lack of planned program activities enable unfocused and ineffective spending • Training SOWs included? • Lack of planned program activities enable unfocused and ineffective spending • Subgrant schedules Provided?

  9. More HMEP to Come… • Administrative Requirements • HMEP Grant Management Training (Program Terms & Conditions)

More Related