1 / 16

Trial Service and Recommendations – D11

This document provides an overview of the methodology used in the REGNET final project review, including usability testing, validation phases, and different document types. It also highlights the valuable input received and includes recommendations for the future development of the REGNET platform.

fgallop
Download Presentation

Trial Service and Recommendations – D11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trial Service and Recommendations – D11

  2. Methodology(1/3) • Usability Testing • 2 validation phases • Different document types • Technical Response Cycle • Responses to validation phase 1 • Bi-directional way of communication • Behavioural Observations • Valuable input for SWOT REGNET Final Project Review

  3. Methodology (2/3) Feedback Content-techn. generation Reference & methodology Demonstration & Marketing Results collection Reporting & documentation Course and scheduling CSC Strategy REGNET Final Project Review

  4. Methodology(3/3) • Focus on • General appearance • Overall Performance – Functionalities • Metrics • SWOT analysis REGNET Final Project Review

  5. General Appearance Reference: validation phase 1 REGNET Final Project Review

  6. Performance Reference: validation phase 1 REGNET Final Project Review

  7. Web Statistics(1/2) NOVEMBER +300% +230% FEBRUARY REGNET Final Project Review

  8. Web Statistics (2/2) Reference: February 2003 Content Providers Data Bases REGNET Final Project Review

  9. SWOT Analysis- (SW 1/2) Reference: week 8 2003 REGNET Final Project Review

  10. Innovation (8.33) Internationalisation /Regionalisation(7.83) Benefits/Costs(7.67) Functionality (7.34) User friendliness(5.33) Reliability (5.33) User support (4.67) SWOT Analysis- (SW 2/2) Reference: week 8 2003 REGNET Final Project Review

  11. SWOT Analysis - (OT 1/2) Reference: week 8 2003 REGNET Final Project Review

  12. Boosting small & medium CH institutions (8.33) Cult. tourism, visits (7.67) Spending on cultural items (7.33) Increasing Internet Usage (7.00) Wireless Technologies (WAP, PDA…)(6.67) Investment in Pieces of Art (6.00) The “haves” and the “have-nots” (4.00) Following all the opportunities (3.67) Trust in Internet payment procedures (2.33) Competitors (2.33) SWOT Analysis- (OT 2/2) Reference: week 8 2003 REGNET Final Project Review

  13. REGNET-Conclusions (1/2) 1. The whole REGNET system and approach proved to be veryvalid and usable in the CH domain. 2. All basic issues and structures for a full internationalisation level are realised. 3.The System contains solutions covering a broad range of functionalities needed in a CH environment. The market potential of the individual modules varies. 4. The REGNET platform provides integration capabilities for the individual modules. Further streamlining possible. 5. User Support is addressed. REGNET Final Project Review

  14. REGNET-Conclusions (2/2) 6. A lot of innovations are included. 7. Tools are competitive, especially when combined with others. Awareness of niche market players is necessary. 8. REGNET shows evidence to address the CH domain. Amore distinctive character is envisaged. 9. Cultural Heritage Institutions will benefit of lower total cost of ownership (TCO) through the Cultural Service Centres (CSC) 10. Increased spending on Cultural offers and goods will boost the business opportunities for CSCs and its members. REGNET Final Project Review

  15. REGNET- Recommendations (1/2) 1. Continue establishing the CSC concept 2. Continue the use of Open Source Technologies 3. Promote the “brand” as much as possible 4. Go for cross-disciplinary partnerships 5. Explore new opportunities (a.o. knowledge engineering) REGNET Final Project Review

  16. REGNET- Recommendations (2/2) 6. Have a close watch on interoperability issues. 7. Focus on further development of the modules. 8. Take care of the usability/supportaspects of the tools 9. Prioritarise tool offerings 10. Make different business scenarios REGNET Final Project Review

More Related