460 likes | 539 Views
The Road to Sprawl. Origins. anti-urban ideologies of Howard, Wright, etc. streetcar suburbs (e.g. Riverside) Federally insured (FHA) home loans from 1933 term was lengthened from 5-10 to 20-30 Federal Govt. insured lenders in case of foreclosure
E N D
Origins • anti-urban ideologies of Howard, Wright, etc. • streetcar suburbs (e.g. Riverside) • Federally insured (FHA) home loans from 1933 • term was lengthened from 5-10 to 20-30 • Federal Govt. insured lenders in case of foreclosure • Veterans Administration (GI-bill) created no-down payment loans • FAHA: Federally-subsidized highway construction (states ended up paying 10%) • Congress creates a form of corporate welfare under hard lobbying from the “road gang”: oil, car, and tire corporations • Automobile dependency of American society
H. Gans “Levittowners” • Studied residents of 1st mass-produced housing (William Levitt → Levittown, NY and NJ) late 1940s • Middle-class values were being asserted vs. working class and upper middle class • Class conflict was not explicit but was evident in struggles over public services such as fire protection, libraries, and schools (Herbert Gans) • While they were wealthy enough to apply “all-of-the-above” philosophy, their model of community (no taxes, every family for itself) led to an “either/or” philosophy and consequently to class struggle
Levitt’s New Urban Dream Peter Bacon Hales: http://tigger.uic.edu/~pbhales/Levittown.html
What kind of community was left behind? (Jane Jacobs) • stable • dense • proprietary attitude toward neighborhood • informal maintenance of order • “eyes on the street” • round-the-clock activity • pedestrian space (sidewalk) • mix of ages and uses • “sidewalk ballet” Photo: New Deal Network, http://newdeal.feri.org/library/sg014.htm
classism racism federal policy automobile dependency ageing infrastructure inner-city crime school quality inner-city pollution What’s wrong with this list? The fact that it is a list! Centrifugal Forces
Some New Urban Landscapes • Brownfields • Greenfields • Purified Residential Spaces • Machine Spaces • Automobile Graveyards
Discovery of the 1990s • If everyone wants to live where the rich live, only the really poor will be left in the inner city • This will mean the city has no fiscal resources to address their problems • Could it be that the way address the social problems of the inner city is to quit running away?
Remaining Problem • Cities are increasingly based around the use of private, motorized transportation: cars, SUVs, light trucks, vans, motorcycles • Pedestrian spaces are severely degraded • noise • air pollution • lack of access • separation of destinations
Much of this comes back to anti-urban ideologies What are our dreams of the “good life”?
Final Thoughts • If everyone wants to live “in nature” the rate of habitat destruction will continue to accelerate • If everyone tries to get away from people who are poorer this amounts to imposing a travel-tax on the poor who must travel farther to access jobs, services, retail, useable public spaces, etc. • Could it be that the way to improve our social lives and the environment is to quit running away from the city and start acting as if we intend to make the city our home?