540 likes | 551 Views
Learn how the General Linear Model (GLM) framework refines statistical inferences using MRI images, time series, experimental conditions, and noise corrections. Explore GLM matrix formats and parameter estimation methods.
E N D
The General Linear Model (for dummies…) Carmen Tur and Ashwani Jha 2009
Overview of SPM Statistical parametric map (SPM) Design matrix Image time-series Kernel Realignment Smoothing General linear model Gaussian field theory Statistical inference Normalisation p <0.05 Template Parameter estimates
What is the GLM? • It is a model (ie equation) • It provides a framework that allows us to make refined statistical inferences taking into account: • the (preprocessed) 3D MRI images • time information (BOLD time series) • user defined experimental conditions • neurobiologically based priors (HRF) • technical / noise corrections
Data Collect Data Y X How does work? • By creating a linear model:
Collect Data Generate model How does work? • By creating a linear model: Data Y X Y=bx + c
N Collect Data å 2 e = minimum t = t 1 Generate model Fit model How does work? • By creating a linear model: Data Y e X Y=0.99x + 12 + e
Collect Data Generate model Fit model Test model How does work? • By creating a linear model: Data Y e X Y=0.99x + 12 + e
GLM matrix format • But GLM works with lists of numbers (matrices) Y = 0.99x + 12 + e Y = β1X1 + C + e 5.9 1 2 15.0 2 0 18.4 3 5 12.3 4 4 24.7 5 8 23.2 6 8 19.3 7 0 13.6 8 9 26.1 9 1 21.6 10 5 31.7 11 2
GLM matrix format • But GLM works with lists of numbers (matrices) Y = 0.99x + 12 + e Y = β1X1 + β2X2 + C + e 5.9 1 2 15.0 2 2 18.4 3 5 12.3 4 5 24.7 5 5 23.2 6 2 19.3 7 2 13.6 8 5 26.1 9 5 21.6 10 5 31.7 11 2 sphericity assumption We need to put this in… (data Y, and design matrix Xs) ‘non-linear’
GLM matrix format X + y =
A very simple fMRI experiment One session Passive word listening versus rest 7 cycles of rest and listening Blocks of 6 scans with 7 sec TR Stimulus function Question: Is there a change in the BOLD response between listening and rest?
A closer look at the data (Y)… Time Time BOLD signal Look at each voxel over time (mass univariate)
error = + + 1 2 Time e x1 x2 The rest of the model… Instead of C BOLD signal
The GLM matrix format = + X y
…easy! • How to solve the model (parameter estimation) • Assumptions (sphericity of error)
N å 2 e = minimum t = t 1 Solving the GLM (finding ) • Actually try to estimate • ‘best’ has lowest overall error ie the sum of squares of the error: • But how does this apply to GLM, where X is a matrix… ^ ^ e Y=0.99x + 12 + e
…need to geometrically visualise the GLM in N dimensions y x1 x2 ^ = + N ^
…need to geometrically visualise the GLM y x1 x2 ^ + = N=3 x2 Design space defined by y = X What about the actual data y? ^ ^ x1
…need to geometrically visualise the GLM y x1 x2 ^ + = N=3 y x2 Design space defined by y = X ^ ^ x1
ˆ = b ˆ y X Once again in 3D.. • The design (X) can predict the data values (y) in the design space. • The actual data y, usually lies outside this space. • The ‘error’ is difference. y ^ e x2 x1 Design space defined by X
N å 2 e = minimum t = t 1 ˆ = b ˆ y X Solving the GLM (finding ) – ordinary least squares (OLS) • To find minimum error: • e has to be orthogonal to design space (X). “Project data onto model” • ie: XTe = 0 XT(y - X) = 0 XTy = XTX y e x2 x1 Design space defined by X
Assuming sphericity • We assume that the error has: • a mean of 0, • is normally distributed • is independent (does not correlate with itself) =
Assuming sphericity • We assume that the error has: • a mean of 0, • is normally distributed • is independent (does not correlate with itself) = x
Half-way re-cap… GLM Solution Ordinary least squares estimation (OLS) (assuming i.i.d. error): = + y X
GLM Methods for dummies 2009-10 London, 4th November 2009 II part Carmen Tur
Problems of this model HRF Neural stimulus time Neural stimulus hemodynamic response I. BOLD responses have a delayed and dispersed form expected BOLD response Hemodynamic Response Function: This is the expected BOLD signal if a neural stimulus takes place expected BOLD response = input function impulse response function (HRF)
Problems of this model Solution: CONVOLUTION I. BOLD responses have a delayed and dispersed form HRF Transform neural stimuli function into a expected BOLD signal with a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF)
Problems of this model II. The BOLD signal includes substantial amounts of low-frequency noise WHY? Multifactorial: biorhythms, coil heating, etc… HOW MAY OUR DATA LOOK LIKE? Real data Predicted response, NOT taking into account low-frequency drift Intensity Of BOLD signal Time
Problems of this model II. The BOLD signal includes substantial amounts of low-frequency noise Solution: HIGH PASS FILTERING discrete cosine transform (DCT) set
Interim summary: GLM so far… • Acquisition of our data (Y) • Design our matrix (X) • Assumptions of GLM • Correction for BOLD signal shape: convolution • Cleaning of our data of low-frequency noise • Estimation of βs • But our βs may still be wrong! Why? • Checkup of the error… • Are all the assumptions of the error satisfied? STEPS so far…
Problems of this model e 0 0 t It should be… III. The data are serially correlated Temporal autocorrelation: in y = Xβ + e over time e e in time t is correlated with e in time t-1 t It is…
Problems of this model III. The data are serially correlated Temporal autocorrelation: in y = Xβ + e over time WHY? Multifactorial…
Problems of this model III. The data are serially correlated Temporal autocorrelation: in y = Xβ + e over time et= aet-1 + ε (assuming ε ~ N(0,σ2I)) Autoregressive model autocovariance function in other words: the covariance of error at time t (et) and error at time t-1 (et-1) is not zero
Problems of this model III. The data are serially correlated Temporal autocorrelation: in y = Xβ + e over time et= aet-1 + ε (assuming ε ~ N(0,σ2I)) Autoregressive model et -1= aet-2 + ε et -2= aet-3 + ε … et= aet-1 + ε et=a (aet-2 + ε) + ε et=a2et-2 + aε + ε et=a2(aet-3 + ε) + aε + ε et=a3et-3 + a2ε + aε + ε … But ais a number between 0 and 1
Problems of this model in other words: the covariance of error at time t (et) and error at time t-1 (et-1) is not zero time (scans) ERROR: Covariance matrix 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 time (scans)
Problems of this model III. The data are serially correlated Temporal autocorrelation: in y = Xβ + e over time et= aet-1 + ε (assuming ε ~ N(0,σ2I)) Autoregressive model autocovariance function in other words: the covariance of error at time t (et) and error at time t-1 (et-1) is not zero This violates the assumption of the error e ~ N (0, σ2I)
Problems of this model III. The data are serially correlated Solution: 1. Use an enhanced noise model with hyperparameters for multiple error covariance components It should be… It is… et= ε et= aet-1 + ε et= aet-1 + ε ? Or, if you wish et= ε a ≠ 0 But…a? a = 0
Problems of this model III. The data are serially correlated Solution: 1. Use an enhanced noise model with hyperparameters for multiple error covariance components We would like to know covariance (a, autocovariance) of error But we can only estimate it: V V = ΣλiQ i V = λ1Q1 + λ2Q 2 λ1 and λ2: hyperparameters Q1 and Q2: multiple error covariance components It should be… It is… et= aet-1 + ε et= aet-1 + ε ? et= ε a = 0 a ≠ 0 But…a?
Problems of this model III. The data are serially correlated Solution: 1. Use an enhanced noise model with hyperparameters for multiple error covariance components 2. Use estimated autocorrelation to specify filter matrix W for whitening the data et= aet-1 + ε(assuming ε ~ N(0,σ2I)) WY = WXβ + We
Other problems – Physiological confounds • head movements • arterial pulsations (particularly bad in brain stem) • breathing • eye blinks (visual cortex) • adaptation affects, fatigue, fluctuations in concentration, etc.
Other problems – Correlated regressors Example: y = x1β1 + x2β2 + e When there is high (but not perfect) correlation between regressors, parameters can be estimated… But the estimates will be inefficiently estimated (ie highly variable)
Other problems – Variability in the HRF • HRF varies substantially across voxels and subjects • For example, latency can differ by ± 1 second • Solution: MULTIPLE BASIS FUNCTIONS (another talk) HRF could be understood as a linear combination of A, B and C A B C
Ways to improve the model Model everything globalactivity or movement Important to model all known variables, even if not experimentally interesting: effects-of-interest (the regressors we are actually interested in) + head movement, block and subject effects… conditions: effects of interest subjects • Minimise residual error variance
How to make inferences REMEMBER!! • The aim of modelling the measured data was to make inferences about effects of interest • Contrasts allow us to make such inferences • How? T-tests and F-tests Another talk!!!
SUMMARY Using an easy example...
Given data (image voxel, y) Y= X. β+ ε
Different (rigid and known) predictors (regressors, design matrix, X) Y= X. β+ ε Time x6 x5 x4 x3 x2 x1
Fitting our models into our data (estimation of parameters, β) Y= X. β+ ε Y= X. β+ ε x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6
Fitting our models into our data (estimation of parameters, β) HOW? Y= X. β+ ε Minimising residual error variance