1 / 17

Overview on EU Accounting issues Moscow – 27 February 2008

Overview on EU Accounting issues Moscow – 27 February 2008. Jeroen Hooijer Head of accounting Unit, EU Commission. IAS Regulation (1606/2002/EC). Directly applicable in all EU member states (MS) - 2005 No national variations

finna
Download Presentation

Overview on EU Accounting issues Moscow – 27 February 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview on EU Accounting issues Moscow – 27 February 2008 Jeroen Hooijer Head of accounting Unit, EU Commission

  2. IAS Regulation (1606/2002/EC) • Directly applicable in all EU member states (MS) - 2005 • No national variations • All EU companies that are listed in the EU use endorsed IAS/IFRS for consolidated accounts • Non-EU issuers outside the scope • MS Option to extend the scope to: • unlisted companies (authorized by many MS) • individual accounts (authorized by few MS)

  3. Major challenges faced in 2005 • International system • First-time application • Principles based – Professional judgment required • Complex - Integration of risk and financial analysis • Replace 25 national accounting legislation transposing Directives and application practices • Experience of users • Scope of application

  4. The EU endorsement process • political and legal endorsement of IFRS • Criteria • IFRS not contrary to “true and fair view” principle of Accounting Directives • IFRS must be conducive to public good (competitiveness and convergence) • IFRS must be understandable, relevant, reliable and comparable

  5. Endorsement process IASB European Commission European Parliament EFRAG SARG ARC (Accounting Regulatory Committee Interest groups

  6. Time-line of endorsement 2 m 0,75m 0,75m 2 m + 3m ARC opinion IASB approval EFRAG advice Translations EU review EU-Parliament SARG advice EU Institutions Endorsed by EC

  7. Endorsement – state-of play • All IAS and SIC, except some provisions of IAS 39, are endorsed • (a few provisions of IAS 39 related to hedge accounting are carved out) • New IFRS and IFRIC endorsed • New standards in the pipeline: i.a. BUSCOM - II

  8. Need for coherent application • clear standards • monitoring • Learning from preparers’ experience • Need for interpretations/guidance • Role of auditors and other enforcers • Studies (ICAEW, CESR): ”challenging but successful”

  9. Equivalence / Convergence EU « Equivalence » IASB / FASB « Convergence » US « acceptance of IFRS »

  10. US “acceptance of IFRS” • SEC ”road map” with 2007-2009 time frame: • Removal of the reconcilation requirement for EU issuers registered with the SEC • Required: • Progress on convergence of standards • Consistency of application of IFRS across countries and industries • SEC Rule of 15 Nov. 2007- IFRS recognized. • Concept release: Also US issuers to use IFRS?

  11. US - continued • - Application for 2007 • - IFRS as adopted by the IASB • - IAS 39 – reconciliation to IFRS – (one company) • - 2 years period

  12. Governance IASB • Press-release 8 November 2007 • US-SEC, FSA- Japan, EU Commission and IOSCO • Independent oversight; • Monitoring body • Due process, impact assessments • Nomination process

  13. European Structure • Early, upstream input towards IASB • Coherent and convincing European positions • Need for strong European presence, - not a new standard setter • How?

  14. EU “equivalence” • Foreseen by Transparency and Prospectus Directives • Commission to assess whether third country GAAP’s are ”equivalent” to IFRS • Equivalence mechanism adopted in December 2007 • Decision on GAAP’s before 2009 • Further transition-period for those converging - 2011 • Reciprocity

  15. IFRS Global framework – EU perspective IFRS Global framework – EU perspective IASB Other countries COMMISSION FASB EC EP ASBJ SEC Transatlantic dialogue CESR EFRAG NSS NSS NSS

  16. The EU approach in an international context • The EU supports worldwide use of IFRS • IFRS has speeded up accounting reforms in major markets • IFRS often integrated into national GAAPs • Mutual recognition in the US

  17. Contact • DG Internal Market & Services website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/index.htm

More Related