370 likes | 492 Views
2011 CAPF Professional Workshop. Professional Sign-offs. Divider: Option 2 This may be used as a main section divider. Professional Sign-offs. 1- Why Authentication/Validation 2- Annex 2 – RFP Validation 3- Approval Process 4- Compliance Assurance 5- Authentication Policy.
E N D
2011 CAPF Professional Workshop Professional Sign-offs
Divider: Option 2This may be used as a main section divider Professional Sign-offs 1- Why Authentication/Validation 2- Annex 2 – RFP Validation 3- Approval Process4- Compliance Assurance5- Authentication Policy
Why Authentication/Validation? • Professional Work • Forestry Professional • Code of Ethics • Standards of Practice • Professional integrity
Authentication / Validation • Authentication Policy • Validation (Annex 2)
Divider: Option 2This may be used as a main section divider Annex 2 - RFP Validation
Definition RFP Regulated Forestry Professional • Regulated member • College of Alberta Professional Foresters • College of Alberta Professional Forest Technologists • RPF or RPFT only
RFP Role • RFPs must submit work (Annex 2) • Work done by RFP or others • Exemption – Companies harvesting less than 30,000 m3 annually from public land • Validating Work • Sign, professional title (RPF, RPFT), registration number • Stamping (professional seal) and signing
Why RFP Validation? • Assurance that work is • completed by qualified professionals • prepared with due diligence • Accurate (done by RFP or others) • Complete and accurate “auditable” records are kept
Due Diligence • Desired outcome achieved • Negative consequence minimized • Completeness • Conclusions • Procedures followed (e.g. SOP, checklists) • Records kept (and retrievable)
Complete and Accurate • Free of errors or omissions • Submitted on time • Prompt notification and correction • Readily understood • Complete documentation
Responsibility and Accountability • Industry and Government RFPs • meet standards • work they oversee, complete and submit • Government RFPs • complete accurate and timely reviews • direction or corrective action • Accountability is not transferred
Divider: Option 2This may be used as a main section divider Approval Process
Appraisal • Work with Significant potential risk • SRD due diligence • Communication is critical • Validated work is accurate
Appraisal • Verify completeness • Verify accuracy • Review checklists • Review risk items (e.g. past performance) • Communication is critical
Validated and Complete Appropriate explanation Recommend approval Validated and Incomplete Appropriate explanation Recommend approval Appraisal
Appraisal Validated and Incomplete • Without appropriate explanation • Without explanation • Do not accept Not validated • Do not accept
Reviewing RFP Prepare and File Report • Factors chosen to evaluate • Results of assessment on accuracy • Outcome of appraisal • Recommendations/decision rationale • Reviewer names, dates • Validation
FMP Appraisal • Validated • Review checklists http://srd.alberta.ca/ManagingPrograms/ForestManagement/RegulatedForestryProfessionals.aspx • Compare FMP against Standards • Appraisal checklists
FMP Appraisal • Standards / adjusted standards met (e.g ToR, Approval Letters) • Stakeholder input • Consultation Records • Public • Aboriginal
FMP Appraisal • Reviewing RFPs Appraisals validated and filed. • Recommendations to FMB Executive Director
FMP Approval • Approval by FMB Executive Director • Approval Decision • Validated • Available to Public
Annual Operating Plan • Appraisal • General Development Plan • Compartment Assessments • Acceptance • Final Harvest Plan • Road Plan and Fire Control Plan • Reforestation Program
Acceptance • Work with limited potential effect • Validated/Checklists • Complete • Appropriate explanation • Accept • Approved in 5 days • Field Inspections
Compliance Assurance • Industry Self-Reporting • SRD Inspections • FOMP Internal Audits
Industry Self-Reporting • See Directive 2006 – 04 Timber and Reforestation Operations Monitoring (i.e. status of active timber operations by disposition) • Monthly reporting form – must be validated
Forest Operations Monitoring Program • FOMP is ISO 9001:2008 Registered • Quality Management System • Management-improvement focused • Pro-active communications • Based on plan-do-check-act cycle
FOMP Inspections • Inspections conducted by SRD Staff • Validate Inspections • FOMP Course • CAPF or CAPFT member • Number of inspections is risk based • Based on enforcement history and past performance • Harvest level • Validation
2009-2010 FOMP Report Top Operational Issues • Utilization Standards • Forest Protection – debris disposal • Watercourse protection
FOMP Audits • Internal "audits" • Audit 20% of total inspections by inspector • Implications – induced error • Address non-compliance
Validation (Annex 2) • Reliance on Professional Integrity -Forest Management Process • Government and Industry RFPs
CAPF Authentication Policy • Effective August 1, 2010 • Demonstrate to: • Public • Government • Other professional association • Work completed/reviewed by RFPs • Bound by Code of Ethics • Advanced Education
CAPF Authentication • Period of Education • Monitoring and Enforcement • Public /Private Land
Thank you!Contact Information Email: Vicky.Bosse@gov.ab.caTel: (780) 427-4707