510 likes | 635 Views
Future radio observations of the high redshift universe. Open Questions in Cosmology Munich Aug 22-26 2005 Ron Ekers CSIRO. Overview of new facilities at radio wavelengths. Many other talks on mm and submm results so I will concentrate on cm and m wavelengths ie freq < 30GHz
E N D
Future radio observations of the high redshift universe Open Questions in Cosmology Munich Aug 22-26 2005 Ron Ekers CSIRO
Overview of new facilities at radio wavelengths • Many other talks on mm and submm results so I will concentrate on cm and m wavelengths • ie freq < 30GHz • GMRT (3x VLA at low frequency) • LOFAR (very low frequency, multibeaming, multi-user) • EVLA (VLA with bandwidth) • ATA (16x VLA field of view, multi-user) • SKA – all of above and some • Continued role for special purpose experiments • Mainly at very high and very low frequencies
Unique SKA traits for cosmology • sensitivity 106 m2. HI out to z=3 • cost of collecting area reduced by consumer electronics • FoV - at least 1 deg2, maybe 100 deg2 • Moores law • Simultaneous observations at all frequencies • specs call for 0.1 to 25GHz • more likely is (0.1-0.7) + (0.7-2) + (2-20) GHz • driven by the antenna technology EVLA I first LOFAR
{ SKA Key Science Goals • Probing the dark ages before the first stars • Evolution of galaxies and large scale structure in the universe • Origin and evolution of cosmic magnetism • The cradle of life (terrestrial planets) • Strong field tests of gravity via pulsars and black holes • and... Exploration of the unknown
SKA 6cm HST SKA’s 1o field-of-view SKA 20 cm and x100 possible! 15 Mpc at z = 2 ALMA
Why use HI for Surveys? • Most abundant element in the Universe • Simplest constituent of the Universe • We may be able to understand it • Provides the fuel for star formation • Hence necessary to interpret star formation rates • Simultaneous velocities and line widths • Bias’s surveys to late type galaxies • Avoids some of the non-linear effects of clustering
Parkes multibeam The 10 Gyr gap in the Gas Evolution History of the Universe No data Models imply HI(1+z)2-3 (+Pei et al 1999) DLAs HIPASS
Zwaan et al. (2001) A2218 z=0.18 WSRT 12x18 hr Why collecting area is critical for HI... Sensitivity: SNR A.t for a radio telescope (background-noise limited) with collecting area A, integration time t. Approximate time needed to detect an M* spiral galaxy (MHI = 6 x 109 Msun) at z=0.1: Parkes (3200 m2) 120 hours (5 days) 0.1 SKA (100,000 m2) 7 minutes Full SKA (1,000,000 m2) 5 seconds For any given collecting area, there is an effective zmaxbeyond which HI emission is effectively undetectable.
Probing Dark Energy with the SKA • Standard ruler based on baryonic oscillations (wriggles) • Need to reach z ~ 1 • Current limit z = 0.2 so > x25 in sensitivity • Optimum strategy is the survey the largest area • Minimise cosmic variance • Large FoV makes this practical • HI selection strong bias to late type galaxies • SKA FoV=1sq deg in 1 year • 109 galaxies, 0 < z < 1.5 Δω =0.01 • Or 1/10 SKA pathfinder with FoV=100sq deg $1B and 2020 $0.2B and 2012
Epoch of Re-ionization at radio wavelengths • Look at effects of the re-ionization on the HI • Look at the sources of re-ionization
High Redshift HI Experiments • Bebbington (1985); Uson; et alia • Current generation: • PAST 21CMA (Pen, Peterson, Wang: China) • LOFAR(de Bruyn et alia: The Netherlands) • MWA (Lonsdale, Hewitt et alia: WA) • PAPER (Backer, Bradley: NRAO GBWA?) • CORE (Ekers, Subramanian, Chippendale: WA) • Next generation: • SKA (International) $$ $$$ $$ $$ $ $$$$$ Don Backer
D.H.O. Bebbingtona radio search for primordial pancakes Redshift not known Technology well developed Black~60 mJy/beam Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. (1986) 218, 577-585 Don Backer
Shaver et al. “Can the reionization epoch be detected as a global signature in the cosmic background?” P.A. Shaver, R.A. Windhorst, P. Madau, and A.G. de Bruyn Astron. Astrophys.345, 380–390 (1999) Don Backer
A Global EoR Experiment • Cosmological Re-Ionization Experiment – CoRE • Ekers, Subramanian, Chippendale - ATNF • Measurement of any mK spectral features in the global low-frequency radio background • Antenna with one steradian beam • 110-230 MHz band : corresponding to z = 5-12 Ravi Subramanyan
Global EoR is challenging • Cant use spatial structure to remove foregrounds • Needs 50,000:1 spectral dynamic range over an octave bandwidth • Spectral contaminants (additive) • Bandpass calibration (multiplicative) • Quality is important here: not quantity. • The telescope required is a precision instrument, not a big bucket. Ravi Subramanyan
Need a design with minimum frequency dependence 3D beam shape of the pyramidal spiral antenna Antenna modeling: Ravi Subramanyan
2-arm log-spiral winding 4 arm variation is possible Support structure Styrofoam pyramid Foam, glue and paint tested using the Australia Telescope interferometer CoRE Antenna Ravi Subramanyan
Interference environment in Australia Sydney : 4 million people Narrabri : 7000 Mileura : 4 80 --- 1600 MHz Ravi Subramanyan
PAPER @ Mileura? Walsh Homestead CSIRO RFI van at SKA core site PAPER site to south? Don Backer
21cm fluctuationsObservability PAST LOFAR SKA • Zaldarriaga et al • ApJ 608, 622 (2004) • 4w integration noise power Cleaned foreground ! LOFAR Error in noise power SKA
MIT Telescope and Mileura Sunset The best way to search for HI in the epoch of re-ionization? • HI redshifted to z=6 (200MHz) to z=17 (80MHz) • Global signal • Easily detectable but needs spectral dynamic range of >105 : 1 • Statistical detection of fluctuations • PAPER (1o) • PAST, MWA, LOFAR (3’) • Extreme control of foreground leakage necessary • Direct detection of structure • Needs full SKA Ekers - Bali
Some comments on foregrounds • Foreground is 103 - 105 x EoR signal • depending on resolution and z • Continuum - both discrete and diffuse • Some line • Search in frequency removes most of the problem • Frequency structure due to Faraday Rotation in the polarized galactic synchrotron emission • Need full polarization, and polarization purity • Frequency structure in the array sidelobes • Keep antenna sidelobes low • Model and subtract source sidelobes (over whole sky) Very different to CMB Very different to CMB
SKA observation of HI absorption in the EoR Cyg A at z =10 S = 20mJy SKA: 10days, 1kHz Carilli 2002
1’’~ 7 kpc foreground object ATCA 16-26 GHz CO(1-0) 80-100 GHz CO(5-4) van Breugel et al. 1999 TN J0924-2201 z=5.2CO detection • Compact 1.2’’ double • Under-luminous Lya • Protocluster cD
CO(5-4) CO(1-0) 10 CO(5-4) Flux Density (mJy beam-1) 5 0 -5 TN J0924-2201RESULTS CO(1-0): peak 0.5 mJy/beam width=250-400 km/sec Ico = 0.087Jy/beam km/sec CO(5-4): peak 10 m Jy/beam width=200-300 km/sec Ico = 1.14 Jy/beam km/sec
Derived parameters1.Temperature & Density J2 • Optically thick & thermally excited gas goes as J2 (1/25) • Single-component LVG model (C. Henkel & A. Weiss) • Observations of J>5 to constrain excitation conditions • Solid line (best match): log(n)= 3.4 cm-3, T=50K • Higher order transitions are biased to high density regions dashed: log(n) = 4.4cm-3, T = 30K dotted: log(n) = 2cm-3, T = 150K
Searching for redshifted CO with the SKA • CO is redshifted into the cm bands • 20Ghz CO(1-0) at z=5, CO (2-1) at z=10 • very complimentary to ALMA • ALMA can only study high transitions at high redshift • (CO7-6 at z=8) • low excitation transitions are more likely at high z • easier to compare with observations in the local universe • SKA sensitivity more than compensates for transition strength • Blind searching becomes possible with SKA • wide FoV at cm wavelength • Relatively wider bandwidth • eg SKA blind survey (Carilli and Blain 2002) • 15 sources/hr with z>4 using redshifted CO (1-0) at 20GHz Also ACTA and EVLA I
VLA SKA Future Sensitivity HST
Starburst Radio galaxy/AGN VLA B2 3C SKA Radio Source Counts ?
1202-0725 (z = 4.7) 1335-0415 (z = 4.4) 1335-0415 (z = 4.4) Synchrotron Dust Free-free Radiometric Redshifts • M82 Spectrum Condon Ann Rev. 30: 576-611 (1992) • Radiometric redshifts Carilli Ap J513 (1999) • Positions SKA ALMA R. Ekers - Square Km Array
How to find a radio galaxy at z>3 • Redshift - spectral index correlation (Miley et al) • Use spectral index culling to find potential galaxies at high redshift. • Technique has been very successful • Conventional explanation is the negative K correction • This turns out to be wrong! steep spectra may be tracing high density regions (Klamer 2005) • Much more of the high z universe is at high density steep flat Ilana Klamer - ASA
Radio Galaxy - 4C41.17redshift 3.8 • Alignment of radio jets (contours) with other tracers of star formation • VLA radio image • HST F702 • HST F569 • Ly-α van Breugel (1985) R D Ekers
HST K-band Radio VLA CO(2-1) Hu et. al. 1996 ApJ Carilli et. al. 2002 Carilli et. al. 2002 BR 1202-0725 Redshift 4.69 • Radio – CO – Ly alpha – Optical are all aligned ! Klamer, Ekers, et al, ApJ 612, L97 R D Ekers
Alignment with Radio Axis Radio PA Dust PA CO PA Predicted an alignment in 4C41.17 Observed Δpa = 8o Klamer et al. 2004 R D Ekers
CMB – special purpose instruments DASI with sun dogs
CMB foregrounds – role for ground based telescopes? • Acknowledged as the main problem for future experiments (Bouchet, Lawrence) • Measure structures to better understand the physics • Eg spinning dust, galactic polarization • Look after the point source foregrounds • Here we can take advantage of higher angular resolution to separate out and measure the point source foreground • AT20G all sky survey at 20GHz with ATCA • 1/3 southern sky completed to 50-100mJy • Less variability than expected • No power law spectra! • No new class of objects
S-Z • Clusters • Excellent for S-Z because non-thermal confusion can be subtracted • 10<ν<20GHz • Optimum sensitivity • Optimum resolution • Protospheroids • Few μK (very hard with current telescopes) • Only SKA has adequate sensitivity
Stokes I Stokes V Magnetism and Radio Astronomy Most of what we know about cosmic magnetism is from radio waves! • Faraday rotation → B|| • Synchrotron emission → orientation, |B| • Zeeman splitting → B|| Kazès et al (1991) Fletcher & Beck (2004)
The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism: • all-sky radio continuum survey with SKA • measure rotation measures for 108 polarized extragalactic sources, with an average spacing between sightlines of ~60”. • This will completely characterize the evolution of magnetic fields in galaxies and clusters from redshifts z > 3 to the present. • Is there a connection between the formation of magnetic fields and the formation of structure in the early Universe? • When and how are the first magnetic fields in the Universe generated?
Advanced LIGO Pulsars LISA SKA Pulsars as Gravitational Wave Detectors • Millisecond pulsars act as arms of huge detector: QSO astrometry too! Pulsar Timing Array: Look for global spatial pattern in timing residuals! • Complementary in Frequency! Kramer - Leiden retreat (updated)
Exploring the unknown The universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we CAN suppose. J.B.S.Haldane
Exploring the unknown • Astronomy is not an experimental science • Experiments which open new parameter space are most likely to make transformational discoveries • cm radio astronomy has opened all the available parameter space • space, time, frequency, polarization • but the SKA greatly enlarges the volume of parameter space explored • sensitivity and FoV 106 x VLA • New classes of rare objects • Access to the high redshift universe
Key Discoveries in Radio Astronomy# # This is a short list covering only metre and centimetre wavelengths. Wilkinson, Kellermann, Ekers, Cordes & Lazio (2004)
Key Discoveries :Type of instrument • The number of discoveries made with special purpose instruments has declined
Proposed SKA Timeline 2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2020 2013 SKA Pathfinder construction Demonstrator developments 2070+ SKA Construction Site bid Full SKA operational Technology selection SKA production readiness review Site ranking
A possible SKA Pathfinder • One possibility • 1000 x 15m dishes • 0.6 – 2 GHz • Wide field-of-view (35deg2) • 10 x 10 Focal Plane Array • 10% SKA area • Construction 2009-2012 • International collaboration a fundamental component