1 / 16

Understanding AB 1389 Compliance Process in 2008-09: Complete Guide for RDAs and Counties

Dive into AB 1389 reporting requirements for RDAs, counties, and LEAs, ensuring compliance without complications. Learn about retrospective and prospective payment details for FYs 2003-04 to 2008-09, supplemental RL Offset Process, and the role of CCDs in the process.

flax
Download Presentation

Understanding AB 1389 Compliance Process in 2008-09: Complete Guide for RDAs and Counties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RDA Pass-Throughs: How to Comply with AB 1389 Without Giving Away the Store(Or Losing Your Mind!) Presented by: Dante Gumucio Public Economics, Inc. 714-647-6242 dgumucio@pub-econ.com

  2. AB 1389 • Creates HSC 33684 Sets forth new process for RDAs, counties, and the State to report and document AB 1290 payments made to all affected taxing entities in general, and to local educational agencies (LEAs) in particular • Retrospectively for FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08 • Prospectively for FY 2008-09 Any unmade AB 1290 payments still owed for FYs 2003-04 through 2008-09 will be monitored by annual reports by County A-C through Dec. 15, 2014

  3. AB 1389 • Non-LEA Reporting Components • RDAs submit AB 1389 reports to County A-C • County A-C concurs or not with RDAs, and may require RDAs to revise AB 1389 reports over RDA statements of dispute • County A-C submits revised AB 1389 reports to State Controllers Office (SCO) • SCO works with non-concurrent RDAs to try to obtain concurrence • SCO submits SCO Report to Legislative Analyst’s Office, Department of Finance, California Department of Education (CDE), and California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO)

  4. AB 1389 • Impacts on CCDs Based on SCO report, CCCCO calculates what each CCD: • Should have reported for RL offset per SCO • Actually reported for RL offset • Still owes for RL offset CCCCO shall notify each CCD regarding (i) any shortfalls in RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments received for FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08 and 2008-09, and (ii) the “resulting impact on apportionments.” CCDs may submit documentation to the [CCCCO] showing that all or part of the [apparent shortfall for revenue level offset] was previously reported to the [CCCCO]. Upon acceptance of the documentation, the [CCCCO] shall adjust the [revenue level shortfall] amounts previously calculated.

  5. AB 1389 • Impacts on CCDs RDAs making “late” payments • After November 1, 2008 for FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08 • After October 1, 2009 for FY 2008-09 Shall pay to LEAs only facilities share of AB 1290 payments for that (those) year(s): • 52.5% for CCDs • 56.7% for K-12 Districts • 81.0% for COEs Shall pay to ERAF what would otherwise be RL offset share, meaning RL offset has already been taken and 100 percent of what LEA actually receives is available for facilities

  6. AB 1389 • Supplemental RL Offset Process for CCDs • AB 1389 doesn’t create new AB 1290 reporting process for CCDs • AB 1389 DOES create supplemental RL offset process, in addition to CCFS-311 process, for AB 1290 payments for FYs 2008-09 and 2009-10, involving previously unmade AB 1290 payments for FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively • This supplemental RL offset process creates potential for double counting RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments on Form CCFS-311 • To avoid double counting, RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments received IN FYs 2008-09 or 2009-10 FOR FYs 2003-04 through 2008-09 should NOT be reported on Form CCFS-311 in FYs 2008-09 or 2009-10, respectively

  7. AB 1389 • Supplemental RL Offset Process for CCDs • CCCCO will presumably correct apportionments to take any RL offset owed for: • FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08 at P1 in FY 2009-10 (Jan. 15, 2010)* • FY 2008-09 at P1 in FY 2010-11 (Jan. 15, 2011)* • Final RL adjustments per CCFS-311 process will be made at same time as supplemental AB 1389 RL adjustments, i.e., at P1 in FY 2009-10 for FY 2008-09, and P1 in FY 2010-11 for FY 2009-10 * CCCCO “may make the corrections [take any RL offset] over a period of time, not to exceed five years”

  8. Role of CCDs in the Process • CCDs should identify: • Amount of AB 1290 pass-throughs they actually RECEIVED, and corresponding RL offset portion of such payments they SHOULD have reported to CCCCO • Amount of AB 1290 pass-throughs RDAs reportedly PAID per SCO, and corresponding RL offset portion of such payments • RL offset portion of AB 1290 pass-throughs they ACTUALLY reported to CCCCO • CCDs should be prepared to: • DISPUTE any overstatement of RL offset amounts based on overstatement of AB 1290 payments by SCO, and/or understatement of actual prior year RL offsets by CCCCO • DOCUMENT any such dispute based on CCD’s own General Ledger, previous RL reporting forms, etc.

  9. Role of CCDs in the Process • CCDs should identify amount of RDA pass-throughs they actually RECEIVED • By source of payment (RDA vs. County A-C) • By RDA • By Project area or annex/added area • By entitlement, including: • AB 1290 payments • Agreement payments • 2 percent payments

  10. Role of CCDs in the Process • CCDs should identify amount of RDA pass-throughs they actually RECEIVED • By “In” year (year IN which payment is received) • By “For” year (year FOR which payment is made) • Corresponding RL offset obligation by “in” year and “for” year • Zero if for agreement or 2 percent payment • 47.5%, etc. for AB 1290 payments received BY Nov. 1, 2008 and Oct. 1, 2009, respectively • Zero for AB 1290 payments received AFTER November 1, 2008 and Oct. 1, 2009, respectively, IF RDA makes RL offset portion of payment directly to ERAF as required by HSC 33684(j) • SUM of AB 1290 payments and corresponding RL offset obligation by “for” year and by RDA

  11. Role of CCDs in the Process • CCDs should identify amount of AB 1290 payments RDAs reportedly PAID per SCO • SCO Report for prior years titled “Report on Property Tax Pass-Through Payments for Fiscal Years 2003-04 through 2007-08” • Two SCO Reports dated April 2009 and June 2009 • PEI has found numerous inconsistencies between SCO Reports, AB 1389 Reports, and SCO’s own AB 1389 database • SCO Reports appear to be subject to ongoing revision process • SCO Reports show AB 1290 payments by “for” year and by “RDA,” NOT by “in” year or individual Project • For FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08, CCCCO apparently using SCO Report dated June 2009, though that may change as SCO Report is revised, making apparent RL shortfalls a “moving target”

  12. Role of CCDs in the Process • CCDs should identify amount of AB 1290 payments RDAs reportedly PAID per SCO • SCO Report for FY 2008-09 will be due by April 2010, for FY 2008-09 (and for any AB 1290 payments still unmade for FYs for 03-04 through 2007-08) • For FY 2008-09, CCCCO will presumably use SCO Report due by April 2010 (or a later revision)

  13. Role of CCDs in the Process • CCDs should identify RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments they ACTUALLY reported to CCCCO • Through FY 2008-09, Form CCFS-311 did NOT include a data field for reporting RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments, causing: • CCDs to under or over report RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments (e.g., report NO RL offset or 100 percent RL offset) • CCDs to correctly report RL offset of AB 1290 payments (e.g., 47.5 percent RL offset) by: • Burying offset portion in another revenue (property tax) category • Reporting more property tax revenues on Form CCFS-311 than shown by County A-C on Form CCFS-329 (by amount of RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments) • In FY 2009-10 CCCCO expected to revise Form CCFS-311 to include new data field for reporting RL offset portion of AB 1290 payments

  14. Role of CCDs in the Process • CCDs should be prepared to: • DISPUTE any overstatement of RL offset amounts based on overstatement of AB 1290 payments by SCO, and/or understatement of actual prior year RL offsets by CCCCO • DOCUMENT any such dispute based on CCD’s own General Ledger, previous RL reporting forms, etc. • Other LEAs may: • File appeal with Education Audit Appeals Panel pursuant to Education Code Section 41344 or Section 41344.1 (see http://www.eaap.ca.gov) • Request repayment plan (e.g., within 30 days of receiving final determination on appeal) (see http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/au/ag/repayltr.asp)

  15. What’s at Stake • Per June SCO Report for FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08 • $303.89 M total AB 1290 payments paid directly to LEAs, including $40.40 M for CCDs • $174.82 M facilities portion of total AB 1290 payments paid directly to LEAs, including $21.21 M for CCDs • $129.08 M RL offset portion of total AB 1290 payments paid directly to LEAs, including $19.19 M for CCDs

  16. What’s at Stake • NOT shown in June SCO Report for FYs 2003-04 through 2007-08 • ADDITIONAL facilities portion of AB 1290 payments to LEAs paid after Nov. 1, 2008, for which RL offsets have already been paid to ERAF as property taxes • ADDITIONAL AB 1290 payments RDAs paid to LEAs through ERAF, which SHOULD have been (and in Contra Costa, Ventura, San Joaquin and other counties, actually were) reallocated only to LEAs that are “affected taxing entities,” NOT as property taxes but as AB 1290 payments • ADDITIONAL AB 1290 payments RDAs SHOULD have paid to LEAs through ERAF or by other means, but did NOT (due to misinterpretation of redevelopment law), which additional payments were misallocated instead to cities, counties, and special districts or retained by RDAs

More Related