260 likes | 558 Views
Famous Cases with both Criminal and Civil Litigation Components. Not unusual for a set of facts to have both criminal and civil litigation components or implications. Here are a few famous ones you may recall:O.J. SimpsonIMB Chief Dominique Strauss-KahnMichael JacksonKobe BryantBen Roethlisber
E N D
1. Civil LITIGATION, Claims Settlement AND THE impact on criminal proceedingsPresented by Kyson Johnson, TDI Fraud Prosecutor How to avoid rejection of your case by prosecutors
2. Famous Cases with both Criminal and Civil Litigation Components Not unusual for a set of facts to have both criminal and civil litigation components or implications. Here are a few famous ones you may recall:
O.J. Simpson
IMB Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn
Michael Jackson
Kobe Bryant
Ben Roethlisberger
Rodney King
3. Agenda Criminal versus Civil
Parties
Victim’s Rights
Lawsuit/Settlement Before Indictment
Malicious Prosecution
Lawsuit/Settlement After Indictment
Examples
4. Caveat – Presentation Is/Is Not WHAT IT IS NOT…
Not legal advice
Not intended to guide you in your civil settlements
Not an expert in civil Law
WHAT IT IS….
Is intended as general information about prosecutor’s views of civil lawsuits/settlements in relation to criminal prosecutions
Is intended to give you an overview in this area of the law
5. Criminal versus Civil Standards of Proof
Criminal Prosecutions = Beyond a reasonable doubt (highest standard of proof)
Termination of Parental Rights = Clear and convincing evidence
Civil Lawsuits (i.e., insurance lawsuits) = Preponderance of the evidence (51%)
Arrest = Probable cause
Detention = Reasonable suspicion
6. Litigation Parties Civil Cases
Typically Plaintiff versus Defendant
Texas is not a direct action state (injured 3rd party cannot sue insurance companies directly)
May have a variety of parties, including: cross claimants, counter-claims, intervenors, etc.
Information/evidence is normally made available via discovery process to all parties
Criminal Case
State of Texas versus Defendant
Not Victim versus Defendant
Right to information not a two way street (for victim)
State ex rel. Hillbig v. McDonald, 839 S.W.2nd 854 (Crime victim doesn’t have a constitutional or statutory right to evidence in a pending criminal action contained in a prosecutor’s file).
7. Texas Crime Victims’ Rights Texas Constitution – Article I, § 30
On request a crime victim is entitled to:
Notification of court proceedings
Presence at proceedings (with some limitations)
Conference with prosecutor’s office
Restitution
Information regarding the outcome (plea, sentence, release, restitution ordered, etc.)
8. Texas Crime Victims’ Rights Code of Criminal Procedure – Art. 56.01 et seq.
Defines victims’ rights in criminal cases
Only applies to victims of violent crimes (defined)
However, sections frequently utilized in all cases (similar to those provided by Texas Constitution):
Right to information about the case
General information about plea negotiation, restitution, court proceedings
Right to provide information as part of Pre-Sentence Investigation (PSI)
Parole information
Prompt return of property held by law enforcement
9. Lawsuit Before Indictment Instigation of a public prosecution to aid in the collection of a debt is “improperly motivated conduct.” 26 A.L.R.4th 565
Lawyers may not threaten to present criminal charges to a prosecuting authority to obtain advantage in a civil matter. ABA Disciplinary Rule 7-105
Suit before criminal proceedings not a bar to prosecution, just a consideration
Prosecution on charges is sole discretion of District Attorney. Kalyanaram v. Univ. of Tex. Sys., 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 3783
10. Lawsuit Before Indictment Defendant may be entitled to stay of civil proceedings if criminal action pending or instituted. 33 A.L.R Fed. 2d 111, Ashworth v. Albers Medical, Inc. 229 F.R.D. 527(S.D. W. VA 2005)
No Constitutional requirement of stay
Not unconstitutional to force litigant to choose to answer questions or plead 5th Amendment
Five factor test on decision to stay civil case (State dependent)
11. Lawsuit Before Indictment Factors considered by court for stay:
1. Private interest of plaintiffs in proceeding expeditiously balanced against prejudice if delayed;
2. Private interest of and burden on defendant;
3. The interests of the court;
4. The interests of those persons not parties to litigation; and
5. The public interests
12. Lawsuit Before Indictment Civil lawsuit can be helpful to prosecutor:
Government doesn’t always have best resources
Information obtained in civil case used in criminal case:
Generally no meaningful “investigative” discovery in criminal proceeding
Interrogatories, Admissions, Request for Production, Depositions
Discovery obtained in civil case can be utilized in criminal prosecution.
Admissions in civil case may be admissible in criminal case either as a Statement of a party opponent or as confession
Documents obtained by RFP may be admissible as evidence
13. Lawsuit Before Indictment Can be harmful to prosecution:
Civil litigation instituted and plaintiff threatens criminal action to induce settlement (motivation, bias of witnesses, credibility issue)
Settlement is reached and contains a mutual release of any and all claims (not dispositive)
Provides defense with a cross examination material
Provides defense with a jury nullification argument
14. Settlement Before Indictment Fewer complications than Lawsuit, however:
Several factors prosecutors will/should consider
Settlement language
What have the parties agreed to in the release of claims
What loss remains after payment of settlement
Prosecutorial resources
Equity to defendant (prosecutors job is to seek justice not convictions)
Judicial economy
Victims’ motivation/wishes
15. Why so serious?
16. Malicious Prosecution “No one can invoke the criminal law to merely have decided any civil question affecting the indebtedness due from one citizen to another, or other civil right. If defendant knows that plaintiff did not steal or embezzle, but his object in instigating the criminal prosecution is to obtain the payment to him by plaintiff of a debt owed to defendant, the defendant is liable to plaintiff in damages for malicious prosecution. Sebastian v. Cheney, 25 S.W. 691 (1894)
Likewise if the motivation is to avoid payment of a legitimate debt
17. Malicious Prosecution Elements for MP:
Commencement of a criminal action;
Caused or aided by the defendant;
Terminated in favor of the plaintiff;
Plaintiff was innocent;
There was no probable cause for such proceeding;
Done with malice; and
Resulted in damage to plaintiff
Ellis v. Sinton Sav. Asso., 455 S.W.2d 834 (1970 Tex App)
18. Malicious Prosecution All facts known to the prosecutor and acted upon in good faith will be examined to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to maintain an action for malicious prosecution. Sebastian v. Cheney, infra
Thus, prosecutor needs to know of any settlement agreement
If not, argument may be made that prosecutor did not know all of the material facts prior to proceeding with prosecution
19. Malicious Prosecution However, as a defense, “Any person knowing of an offense against the law is authorized to state the facts to the district or county attorney, whose duty it is to determine whether or not an offense against the law has been committed…”
“It is a duty common to all good citizens to report to the constituted authorities every infraction of the law to the end that the law may be enforced, which is a service to the public; and it will by reason of the imperfection of human laws sometimes happen that some innocent men will be accused with honest intentions. Sebastian v. Cheney, infra
20. Lawsuit After Indictment State/prosecutor cannot prevent victim from exercising their civil remedies
Discovery process may provide additional information for use in criminal case
However, State/prosecutor may not attempt to direct civil case to obtain criminal evidence that would otherwise be unobtainable (using suit as mechanism for violation of constitutional right against unlawful search and seizure
Malicious prosecution less likely, but still possible, apply the previously listed factors for malicious prosecution
21. Settlement After Indictment Always notify law enforcement who investigated the case and the prosecutor in charge of prosecution
Is not the end of the criminal case
Will be considered as a factor in a just resolution to the criminal case
Victim cannot agree to dismiss criminal charges, but courts might consider this in a malicious prosecution suit for a prosecution that continues following a settlement with dismissal language (courts split)
22. Example No. 1 Defendant purchased insurance policy following accident and insurer paid for damages that shouldn’t have been covered. Case investigated and referred to DA for prosecution. Prior to referral for prosecution, insurer refers case to collection agency who enters written settlement agreement with defendant. Subsequent to referral for prosecution, defendant pays back all money to collection agency. Defense attorney is kind enough to point out that defendant paid back all money as requested.
23. Outcome No. 1 No language in settlement regarding criminal case
Collection agent did not promise dismissal
Defendant repaid all restitution
Criminal case proceeded to conclusion
Defendant pleaded guilty to reduced charge of attempted insurance fraud and received deferred adjudication
24. Example No. 2 Defendant settled claim with insurance company and received check. Subsequently notified ins. co. that check was not received and requested 2nd check to issue. Cashed both checks. Case referred to DA for prosecution. During investigation, ins. co. referred to collection agent. Collection agent (from NY) told defendant (and his attorney) that he would have criminal case dismissed if defendant paid restitution.
25. Outcome No. 2 Interference with criminal proceeding?
Is victim responsible for actions of agent?
Malicious prosecution?
Defendant paid restitution, what if the case is dismissed due to actions of collection agent?
26. Conclusion No set rule
Communicate intention and actions to investigator and/or prosecutor
Don’t expect to receive “advice” on how you should proceed
Do expect to have all of your documents subpoenaed by the state and probably defense
Act in good faith