1 / 22

Review Logic & Reasoning

Review Logic & Reasoning. Deductive Validity—formal A form such that true premises always  true conclusions Informal test—imagine an argument in that form Core vocabulary: if..then.., and, or, not, all, some, none True premises & false conclusion Sound = df valid and all true premises

fnorsworthy
Download Presentation

Review Logic & Reasoning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review Logic & Reasoning • Deductive Validity—formal • A form such that true premises always  true conclusions • Informal test—imagine an argument in that form • Core vocabulary: if..then.., and, or, not, all, some, none • True premises & false conclusion • Sound = df valid and all true premises • “Conclusions of sound deductive arguments are true” • Sound deduction from definition premises

  2. Other Logics • Inductive—valid when good reasons for the conclusion • Not a guarantee • Analogy, induction on example(s), sampling, science • Inference to the best explanation • Practical syllogism: belief-desire to intention • Needs an “ought” in premises

  3. Inconsistent Triad (deductive) • If conclusion false then • Either premise(s) false or invalid • Formal test for validity • Then key to Socratic rational doubt • Doubt one of your premises • Also key to science: hypothetical decuction • Take current theory as hypotheses • Measurements, mathematics • Predict experimental outcome • Outcome falsifiessome hypothesis wrong

  4. Socrates and Religion Application • Socrates no experimental method • Needs explicit contradiction—harder • Plato cheats a lot • Limits: reveals error not truth • No method to discover truth • Problem of Evil even looser • Needs formal statement unlike the usual • Believer has many options • Accept evil • Best of all possible worlds: Free will • Limited God • Not creator

  5. Theodicy • What is the alternative to no-evil? • God does not exist? • Why does it not prove that? • Theodicy: possible solutions to the problem of evil • Limited god (not perfect/omnipotent) • Free will and necessary evil • Necessary for greater good • Human and divine “good” • Or accept the conclusion • Evil is an illusion

  6. Questions? Tutorials sign up Start next week 2 quizzes

  7. Back to Socrates: Virtue • Use metaphysics model on ethics • Fundamental reality of ‘virtue’, ‘justice’ • Search for definitions using Socratic method • one (conventions many) • unchanging (vs. mores) • knowable (definitions) • rational (Socratic method) and • Real (!) • Why care about those peculiar facts? • No man knowingly does evil

  8. Weakness of Socratic Method • No answers—Socrates the skeptic • Dies ignorant • Famous lament—and student response • At least knows he doesn’t know • 知之為知之不知為不知是知也 • Deeper problem • Many different consistent doctrines • Contradiction not easy to prove • Plato the playwright takes control

  9. Socrates and Plato Story • Death by legislature—wrong • Plato’s hatred of democracy • Better for policy and choice of leaders • Not for judgment of guilt • separate judiciary rule of law • Socrates as figure in his dialogues • Development of Socratic method • Classic example in Thrasymachus dialogue

  10. Plato's Synthesis: • Parmenides: the real world and ethical ideal blend • Real is rational; rational is real • Focus on search for definitions • Socrates origin and geometry • The idea or concept of a thing • Result is the meaning/value = being • Really that being = meaning • Meaning linked to value, purpose • The concept is the thing’s “reality”

  11. Are Definitions Important? • Not to knowing how to speak • Vicious circle • Real life and children learning • Examples: true, cute, way, water • Why such emphasis? • Importance to logical method • Socratic method and validity • Problem of evil example • Can’t test validity w/o form

  12. Definitions: Concept Reality • Conform to rationalist presuppositions • One – concrete instances are many • Unchanging – remain; things change • Knowable -- beliefs about objects • Heraclitus and Parmenides • Rational -- Socratic method • Hence real • Idealism • Definitions (meanings:ideas) real • Sensible “things" are not

  13. Rules for Definitions Implicit in Plato's Socrates • No lists. What is common to all instances • No vagueness. ‘Strong’? • No circularity (or mere synonyms) • Definition so usable in arguments • No hearsay -- test by expert knowledge • Real v. Nominal definitions • Test by reason. Socratic method

  14. Conclusion: The Forms • Forms correspond to definitions (meanings) • Meaning “objects” • Provide unified answer to philo questions • Metaphysics: what is real—objective meaning • Real definitions v. Nominal • Epistemology: what is knowable • Like soul/mind--intellectual • Logic: the thinkable objects • Not laws of thought but semantics • Ethics: no man knowingly does evil • Health of the soul • Definitions of virtues • Objects of striving -- teleological account of change

  15. Difficulty: Famous Analogies • Cave: sensible appearance v reality • C.f. taking hallucinatory drugs • Meditation or rational insight • Analogy: shadow/object as object/form • Equal difficulty in getting you to accept them • When you "see" them, you will need no more convincing • The character of the object determines your knowledge

  16. Line Analogy: • Links metaphysics and epistemology • Knowability depends on nature of object (Parmenides) • Rival view: true belief plus an account (the modern analysis) • X knows that P =df. • P is true • X believes that P • X has justification for believing that P

  17. The Sun Analogy • Rule for identification of forms • Logic: there must be a form of forms • It must be “more real” than the forms • The form of the good: of all value • Form of the truth/beauty/good

  18. Mystical Result • Absolute one/being • No reason leading to see it • It would blind us • But necessarily there (or nothing exists)

  19. Key Political Doctrines • The Republic a political plan • Justice of political structure like that of individual • Same in everything • Rule of the correct ruler—intellect

  20. The Philosopher King • Anti-democratic and manipulative • Education and classes • Social ranks: intellectual, spirited, body-like

  21. End of Plato and Greek Rationalism • Ancient Chinese idealism next!

More Related