120 likes | 132 Views
NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES – POLICY RESPONSES AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. Peter Sarosi Drug Policy Program Director Hungarian Civil Liberties Union. Qualitative Study on NPS in 5 countries.
E N D
NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES – POLICY RESPONSES AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES Peter SarosiDrug Policy Program DirectorHungarian Civil Liberties Union
Qualitative Study on NPS in 5 countries • Aim: to assess how professionals and affected communities perceive 1) the trends in NPS use and related harms 2) the impact of existing policy responses to the NPS phenomenon 3) the best possible policy responses • We asked our national NGO partners to identify 20 stakeholders with wide professional backgrounds • Public health and social service providers, law enforcement professionals, drug users and club owners • 103 phone interviews in 5 countries – wide variety of stakeholders have been interviewed
Drug use patterns Recreational/club drug use (mostly situational) • Young, educated, urban males with access to Internet • Experimenters • Major route of use: smoking or snorting • Risks: psychotic episodes, overdose, aggressive behavior, unprotected sex, HCV • Serbia, Portugal: only this pattern Dependent use pattern (daily) • Young or middle aged men, low class, uneducated, unemployed, marginalized • Experienced heroin/amphetamine users/methadone clients • Major route of use: injecting • More frequent injecting - needle sharing, rapidly deteriorating health condition, aggressive behavior, paranoia, psychosis • Romania, Poland, Hungary: this pattern is very prevalent
Why the patterns differ so much across countries? • Availability of classical drugs • Criminalization of drug users • Access to treatment (OST) • Social status of drug users (concentrated, marginalized Roma communities)
Legislative solutions • Poland: 2010 – Chief Sanitary Inspectorate closed down more than 1000 shops - amendment of the drug law – introducing the term “substitute drug” • Romania: a new law requires shop owners to register all products containing psychoactive substances – if not, the authorities can close them • Hungary: 2012 generic list of new psychoactive substances was introduced – ban on groups of substances • Portugal: introduced a temporary list with 160 substances, banned all commercial activities with these substances
Assessment of policy responses to NPSs • Media-driven policy making – no evidence base • Creation of black market/replacement of the problem • Lack of transparency of the market • Missed opportunity to regulate the market • No monitoring/evaluation of control measures
Public health concerns Injecting NPS use – 10-15 injection per day = growing demand for sterile equipment Coincided with financial austerity – reduced funding for harm reduction programs Result: sharing of needles and infections – consequence: HIV epidemics (Romania, Greece) The treatment system is not prepared to tackle NPS related problems – designed to treat opiate addiction NEEDS: • Trainings • Testing of drug samples • Treatment guidelines
(not so) balanced approach • Controlling substances is not the solution in itself – the solution is on the demand side • Very few public health and social responses to the legal high phenomenon
Policy recommendations • Reallocating resources on education and public health • Research on NPS • Decriminalizing drug use • Regulatory options – the New Zealand model • Rethinking drug policies
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! WWW.DRUGREPORTER.NET