350 likes | 555 Views
The economic dimensions of mental health. Dr Anita Patel Senior Lecturer in Health Economics Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London. Outline. 1. Adults of working age. 2. Children & young people. 3. Older people. Outline. 1. Adults of working age. 2. Children & young people.
E N D
The economic dimensions of mental health Dr Anita Patel Senior Lecturer in Health Economics Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London
Outline 1. Adults of working age 2. Children & young people 3. Older people
Outline 1. Adults of working age 2. Children & young people 3. Older people
Where does economics come in? • Mental health problems place a clinical and social burden on individuals, families and communities • All of these burdens have economic dimensions, which impact on all levels of society
Health care Products Human resources/services
Family burden • Time • Average weekly hours caring for person with schizophrenia: • Amsterdam 0.9 • Leipzig 6.9 • London 10.6 • Verona 5.2 • Lost work, leisure & education opportunities • Lost income • Out of pocket expenses • Family strain Unpublished figures from the QUATRO Study (European Union QLG4-CT-2001-01734)
Economic costs of mental illness in England = £32 billion (43 billion Euros) Patel & Knapp, Mental Health Research Review, 1998
Costs of depression (adults), England, 2000 Thomas & Morris, British Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 183: 514
Costs of depression (adults), England, 2000 Thomas & Morris, British Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 183: 514
Absenteeism (UK) Average employee takes 7 ‘sick days’ per year...40% are for mental health problems Cost to business = £8.4 billion (11.3 billion Euros) The business costs of mental illness Presenteeism (UK) • Mental health problems can make people less productive in the workplace • Cost to business = £15.1 billion (20.4 billion Euros) Staff turnover (UK) • Replacing staff who leave because of mental ill-health • Cost to business = £2.4 billion (3.24 billion Euros) Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. Mental health at work: the business case. 2007
A caution about interpreting lost productivity costs • Many lost productivity estimates are calculated as: • Number of days absent x average daily wage • This (‘human capital’) approach could lead to over-estimates • Workers may compensate for short term absence (Jacob-Tacken et al, 2005) • Workers may be replaced. So only need to calculate costs of the intervening (‘friction’) period e.g. advertising, recruiting, training, low productivity in early phase • Lost productivity due to schizophrenia-related deaths (1996) • Human capital approach = Canadian $105 million • Friction cost approach = Canadian $1.53 (Goeree et al, 1999)
Other large financial impacts • Early retirement – lost productivity • Disability pensions • Disability-related social security benefits (Approximately 40% of people receiving Incapacity Benefit in UK is due to mental illness) • Lost tax income for government • Insurance payouts Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, 2006
Economic burden of mental illness We now know something about: • How large this burden is • How the burden is distributed across the economy • The potential savings from tackling some of the problems But what can we do about it?
What can we do about it? • There are numerous examples of health care, social care, educational and vocational interventions that work • But we can’t pay for them all • Firstly, there are not enough professional, pharmaceutical and other resources to meet all assessed needs • Secondly, even if local, national & Europe-wide budgets were greatly increased, we still need to decide how to allocate these extra funds as effectively as possible • Thirdly, we need to consider equity, not only within mental health sphere but also outside of it…other health and welfare programmes may equally deserve more investment • Economic evaluation can help inform such decisions by considering costs as well as effectiveness • Example….
EQOLISE: evaluation of a supported employment scheme • Sample of 312 people • Adults with diagnosis of psychotic illness • Minimum 2 years duration • Living in community • Not been in competitive employment in previous year • Expressing desire to enter competitive employment • Randomised controlled trial • Individual placement and support (IPS) versus existing rehabilitation and vocational services • 6 European cities: Zurich, London, Ulm, Sofia, Rimini, Groningen Burns et al., Lancet 2007; 370:1146
EQOLISE: effectiveness IPS worked… • Employment rate 27% higher • Average of 100 more days of work • No significant differences between the two groups in other outcomes • But some association between working more and better social functioning, clinical and quality of life outcomes Burns et al., Lancet 2007; 370:1146
EQOLISE: costs And it cost less…so IPS is cost-effective Mean difference in health & social care costs (£) over 18 months Burns et al., Report to EC 2006 (Project QLRT-2001-00683)
A caution about interpreting international evidence • EQOLISE: effectiveness varied across the centres (socio-economic factors, such as GDP growth per capita and local unemployment rate, explained some of this variation) • Costs also varied across sites, with no cost savings in Groningen • This is not an unusual finding….
QUATRO: Another example of variations across study centres Percentage of QUATRO study participants using each resource • Shape and size vary • % using secondary care: 28 – 76% • Average length of stay: 19 – 88 days Need to account for local/national contextual factors when applying evidence to alternative settings Patel. Unit costs of health & social care, University of Kent, 2006.
Outline 1. Adults of working age 2. Children & young people 3. Older people
Children & young people How many people are affected? • 10-20% of European children and adolescents suffer from mental health problems • Suicide is one of the 3 most common causes of death • Other family members are affected With what consequences? • Poor quality of life; damaged family relations • Disrupted education; failure to fulfil potential • Enduring problems into adulthood • High costs to individuals, families, State & economy See Jane-Llopis & Braddick, EC Consensus Paper, 2008
Children with persistent antisocial behaviour: costs in childhood (2000/01) Total annual cost per child excluding state benefits = £5960 per child (8046 Euros) (benefits = £4307; 5814 Euros) Romeo, Knapp & Scott, Brit J Psychiatry 2006; 188: 547
Children & young people How many people are affected? • 10-20% of European children and adolescents suffer from mental health problems • Suicide is one of the 3 most common causes of death • Other family members are affected With what consequences? • Poor quality of life; damaged family relations • Disrupted education; failure to fulfil potential • Enduring problems into adulthood • High costs to individuals, families, State & economy • individuals, families, State & economy What can we do about it? • Parenting support • Prevent bullying & violence • Support in schools • Work with communities • Tackle poverty • Better treatment access But we can’t do everything…so need cost-effectiveness evidence See Jane-Llopis & Braddick, EC Consensus Paper, 2008
Outline 1. Adults of working age 2. Children & young people 3. Older people
Older people How many people are affected? • 5 million or more older Europeans have dementia • 10-15% of people aged 65+ have depression • Suicide rate is highest for older people With what consequences? • Again – devastating impacts on quality of life • Heavy burdens falling to family carers • But often these consequences remain hidden • High costs to individuals, families, State & economy Knapp, Prince et al, Alzheimer’s Society, 2007
Distribution of dementia costs (UK) Knapp, Prince et al, Alzheimer’s Society, 2007
Costs of mental illness (UK) - now Total = £49 billion (66bn Euros) McCrone et al., King’s Fund, 2008
Costs of mental illness (UK) - 2026 Total at 2007 prices = £ 61 billion (82bn Euros) Total at 2026 prices = £88 billion (119bn Euros) McCrone et al., King’s Fund, 2008
Older people How many people are affected? • 5 million or more older Europeans have dementia • 10-15% of people aged 65+ have depression • Suicide rate is highest for older people With what consequences? • Again – devastating impacts on quality of life • Heavy burdens falling to family carers • But often these consequences remain hidden • High costs to individuals, families, State & economy What can we do about it? • Better treatment access • Better preventative efforts • Support for carers • Social integration • Choice and control But we can’t do everything…so need cost-effectiveness evidence See Jane-Llopis & Gabilondo, EC Consensus Paper, 2008
Potential annual savings from selected interventions Range depends on how many more patients are treated and how quickly new services are introduced
Conclusions Mental health problems… • devastating - for individuals of all ages • burdensome - for families • challenging - for communities • very expensive - for economies
MentalHealth care Conclusions Mainstream Health care Criminal justice Social caresystem Mental health care • Sits among a complex array of support agents • Crosses multiple boundaries Familycaregivers Housing provision Educationsystem Community support Income support Employers Danger is that individual sectors may be reluctant to invest if benefits are felt elsewhere and/or much later, leading to low overall investment NEED FOR COORDINATED CROSS-AGENCY ACTION WITH A VIEW TO THE LONG TERM
References • Burns, Catty, Becker, Drake, Fioritti, Knapp, Lauber, Rössler, Tomov, van Busschbach, White, Wiersma, EQOLISE Group. Lancet 2007; 370 (9593):1146-1152. • Burns, Becker, Catty, Fioritti, Knapp, Lauber, Rössler, Tomov, van Busschbach, White, Wiersma, EQOLISE Group. Final Report to European Commission, Project code QLRT-2001-00683, 2006. • Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, 2006 • Goeree, O’Brien, Blackhouse, Agro, Goering. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 44: 455-463 • Jacob-Tacken, Koopmanschap, Meerding, Severens. Health Eocnomics 2005; 14: 435-443 • Jane-Llopis & Braddick, EC Consensus Paper, 2008 • Jane-Llopis & Gabilondo, EC Consensus Paper, 2008 • Knapp, Prince et al. Dementia UK. Alzheimer’s Society, 2007 • McCrone, Dhanasiri, Patel, Knapp, Lawton-Smith. Paying the price. The King’s Fund, 2008. • Patel. Unit costs of health & social care. University of Kent, 2006. • Patel & Knapp. Mental Health Research Review 1998; 5: 4-10. • Romeo, Knapp & Scott. British Journal of Psychiatry 2006; 188: 547 • Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. Mental health at work: the business case. 2007 • Thomas & Morris. British Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 183: 514
Appendix A EQOLISE outcome measures • Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) • Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) • Lancashire Quality of Life Profile - European Version (LQoLP-EU) • Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) • Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN-EU) • Groningen Social Disability Schedule (GSDS) • Helping Alliance Scale (HAS)