300 likes | 471 Views
Scientific Revolutions: Historical Perspective . After the Scientific Revolution: Newtonianism. Newtonianism as a Paradigm for Science in General.
E N D
Scientific Revolutions: Historical Perspective After the Scientific Revolution: Newtonianism
Newtonianismas a Paradigm for Science in General Explanations about nature in terms of perfect, elastic particles, working under “central” forces, whose actions can be explained in precise mathematical terms
מאה 18 Exposition du système du monde (1796) Pierre-Simon, marquis de Laplace(1749-1827)
Newtonianism Richard Bentley (1662-1742) Boyle Lectures (1692-1694) Newton = Christian Faith = Stable Universe = Stable political system
Newtonianism John TheophilusDesaguliers (1683-1744)
Newtonianism Francis Hauksbee (1666-1713)
Newtonianism - British Calculus Colin Maclaurin (1698-1746) Abraham de Moivre (1667-1754) Brook Taylor (1685-1731)
Newtonianism - European Calculus Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705) Guillaume de l'Hôpital (1661-1704) Johann Bernoulli (1667-1748)
Newtonianism - European Calculus Leonhard Euler(1707-1783)
Newtonianism George Berkeley (1685-1753)
Newtonianism Franz Anton Mesmer (1734-1815)
Newtonianism Francesco Algarotti (1712-1764)
Newtonianism Francesco Algarotti (1712-1764)
Newtonianism The Newtonian system of philosophy, adapted to the capacities of young gentlemen and ladies (1761) “Tom Telescope”
Newtonianism The Newtonian system … (1761) Tom Telescope: “A man may even at home and within himself see the wonders of God in the Works of the Creation.”
1744 Maupertuis: Principle of minimal action The amount of action required for any change in nature is the minimal possible one
1744 Maupertuis: Principle of minimal action A unifying principle valid for any natural phenomenon
1744 Maupertuis: Principle of minimal action I could have started from mathematical laws that are confirmed by experience, and tried to show how they reflect the wisdom and power of the supreme Being. But those laws can be uncertain since they are often not based on rigorous proofs or purely geometrical hypotheses. Therefore, I considered it more certain and useful to deduce mathematical laws from the attributes of an all-powerful and all-wise Being. If those derived laws are actually found in the universe, then the proof that this Being exists (and created those laws) is more certain.