120 likes | 129 Views
Explore the implementation of distributed content management in information systems, featuring the benefits of faceted classification, collocation, and triangulation, to deliver an efficient and scalable solution. Learn about strategies, examples, and future plans for integration and usability studies.
E N D
Adding Facets to an Information System Tim Shearer Library Systems
Introduction • Faceted Classification • Task (Marchionini, Hert, Alle) • Collocation (short term) • Triangulation (long term) • Instinct!
Background • Limited Resources • Distributed Content • Most Importantly – Staff with expertise with collections and end users!
Distributed • Goals of Distributed content management • Reduce staff html coding • Distribute Load • Scalable • One of our solutions? • Database back-ends • Middleware front-ends • Administration via Web
Distributed, cont. • Most important! • Let those staff with best knowledge of their environment, their collections, and their collection end-users take charge of the content.
Distributed Examples • Guides • Public Service Point
Eresources • Indexes and Databases (tens to hundred) • Broad Subjects (~12, e.g. Social Sciences) • Ejournals (hundreds to thousands)
“Narrow” Thesaurus • Appropriate chunking for ejournals • Need ~ hundred or so terms • Departments and Curricula • Tie to University • 3 Iterations
Databases grow • Added narrow thesaurus terms to Databases (more than 433 now) • Integrated Broad and Narrow
Examples • Site today • Development version • For instructors – e.g. blackboard • Portal
Timeline • EID –production • EJ –production • Guides –Production • Public Service Point –Development, nearing completion • Staff –nascent • Some Time this Semester!
Caveats/Future • Actual use by Freshmen • Death penalty • Recall Election • We will be doing usability/focus group studies