370 likes | 400 Views
Chapter 11 Emotional Development. Temperament – basic behavioral style Types: categories vs. dimensions. Thomas, Chess, & Birch – categories Easy (40%) - positive mood - regular body functions - low-moderate reactions - positive toward new situations - adaptable. Difficult (10%)
E N D
Chapter 11Emotional Development • Temperament – basic behavioral style • Types: categories vs. dimensions
Thomas, Chess, & Birch – categories • Easy (40%) - positive mood - regular body functions - low-moderate reactions - positive toward new situations - adaptable
Difficult (10%) - negative mood - irregular body functions - intense reactions - negative toward new situations
Slow-to-warm-up (15%) - low activity level - somewhat negative mood - withdraws from new situations - slow to adapt • Mixed characteristics (35%)
Buss & Plomin – dimensions • emotionality • activity level • sociability
Biological basis • sympathetic vs. parasympathetic system in emotionality • moderate stability over infancy Thus, biology + environment
Implications for Parenting • Parents treat siblings differently but have general styles
Thomas, Chess, & Birch • Genetic differences in temperament influence 1. How children respond 2. How others respond to children
Any given practice may produce different responses • Child’s response depends on genetics • Parental flexibility is important • Different parenting strategies with children of different temperaments
Suggestions based on temperament: • Difficult child - consistent, patient, nonpunitive - clear guidelines with firm rules
Slow-to-warm child - let adapt at own pace - do not tease or punish for being shy • Easy child - variety of approaches
Temperament is changeable • Environment heightens or diminishes child’s behavior
**“Goodness of fit” = easier development • Development is smoother when child’s temperament “fits” parenting style • Demands that conflict with child’s temperament -> stress • Higher potential for emotional/behavioral problems
“Goodness of fit” varies - demands of different contexts
=> Neither temperament (nature) nor home environment (nurture) determines adjustment ** Goodness of fit
Attachment • First important relationship
Theories of attachment • Bowlby - Ethology - infant behaviors are biologically based & designed to elicit caregiving
Bowlby: adaptive significance of crying 1) infants’ needs are met 2) increased contact -> attachment
Attachment - reciprocal - cross-cultural - infants are actively sociable
Learning theory - attachment is based on mutual reinforcement
Current Perspective = Integration • Begins via sociobiological mechanisms • Maintained via reinforcement
Growth of Attachment • Discriminate people-objects familiar vs. unfamiliar people primary caregiver vs. familiar others • By 6 months, selectively attend to caregiver
Attachment StylesAinsworth’s Strange Situation • Mom, baby, observer 30 seconds • Mom, baby 3 minutes • Mom, baby, stranger 3 minutes • Baby, stranger < 3 minutes - 1st separation 5. Mom, baby > 3 minutes - reunion
Baby 3 minutes - 2nd separation 7. Baby, stranger < 3 minutes - 2nd, cont. 8. Mom, baby 3 minutes - reunion
Attachment Styles Secure (65-70%) • Upset when mom goes • Happy at reunion • Seek renewed contact • Explore/interact with strangers when she’s there
Insecure-avoidant (20%) • No distress at separation • Ignore returning mom • Uninterested in exploring when she’s there • Wary of/ignore strangers • Depressed/neglectful moms?
Insecure-ambivalent (10-15%) • Very upset during separation • Ambivalent at return (glad but angry) • Wary of strangers, even with mom • Anxious/nonexploratory with mom • Chaotic/inconsistent moms?
Disorganized-disoriented (12?%) • No organized coping style • Contradictory behavior • Confused/anxious/depressed upon reunion • Abusive moms?
Consequences of Secure Attachment • Attachment model for other relationships • Better peer relations • But not necessarily abnormal adjustment if insecure • D-D = probably worse outcome
Working Moms & Daycare Negative Effects on Infants/Toddlers • None just because mom works - compensate with extra attention - same amount of “family time”
Non middle-class, 2-parent homes - kids of single moms insecurely attached upon return to work - some middle-class kids affected if mom returned to work in 1st year - But: Not all kids are affected
Determinants of Adjustment 1. Quality of alternative childcare - small child-to-staff ratio - warm, responsive caregivers - little staff turnover - age-appropriate activities - teacher interaction w/parents
No detrimental effects of good care even as young as 3 months
2. Parent attitudes about maternal employment - moms = happier & sensitive to child if they get to choose + everyone is better adjusted if dad supports decision
3. Number of hours worked (less important) - > 40 hours/week = worse
Effects on School-Age Children • Positive effects, especially for girls - better adjusted - more independent - less traditional sex-role beliefs • Depends on same factors as for infants