1 / 17

Enterprise Learning Management System

Enterprise Learning Management System. Presented by Warren Lee Department of Information Technology March 17, 2010. Enterprise Learning Management System. General features of the enterprise LMS A brief history Snapshot of activities today Overview of System Configuration

fran
Download Presentation

Enterprise Learning Management System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Enterprise Learning Management System Presented by Warren Lee Department of Information Technology March 17, 2010

  2. Enterprise Learning Management System • General features of the enterprise LMS • A brief history • Snapshot of activities today • Overview of System Configuration • Content Development • Questions and Answers

  3. Enterprise Learning Management System General features of the enterprise LMS: • Provide users a vehicle for computer based training. • Automate administration of education activities. • Improve response times to learner inquiries. • Consolidate and store learner transcripts electronically. • Facilitate compliance with state and federal regulatory environments.

  4. Enterprise Learning Management System LMS Timeline • Mar 2003: ITB contract awarded for HIPAA Training • Dec 2005: CT Training and Development Network facilitated study group • Mar 2006: RFI issued to explore Enterprise LMS Technologies • Dec 2006: RFP issued to acquire State hosted, COTS solution • Dec 2008: State’s LMS went “Live” • Mar 2010: State begins wide scale development of web based content Mar 2003 Dec 2005 Mar 2006 Dec 2006 Dec 2008 Mar 2010

  5. Enterprise Learning Management System LMS Utilization2009 • 15,759 unique learner registrations • 56,648 offering registrations for all delivery types • Average is only 4 learners per offering

  6. Enterprise Learning Management System 2009 Utilization of Web Based Training Offerings

  7. Enterprise Learning Management System LMS UtilizationJan through Feb 2010 • Goal: Register 30,000 unique users to WBT offerings. • Goal: Deliver 120,000 hours of WBT offerings. • Through Feb = 13,539 registrations of all types.

  8. A domain in the LMS is provided to each agency. Agency administrators manage their own domain. Administration is role based. Major roles are: People Catalog Content System Enterprise Learning Management System Overview of System Configuration

  9. Enterprise Learning Management System Sample Agency Domains

  10. Enterprise Learning Management System People Administrator

  11. Enterprise Learning Management System Catalog Administrator

  12. Enterprise Learning Management System Content Administrator

  13. Enterprise Learning Management System System Administrator

  14. Enterprise Learning Management System Content Development • Content Development is a separate and distinct process from LMS administration. • Content Developers work with educators to build learning objects designed specifically for LMS delivery.

  15. Enterprise Learning Management System Content Development • Web Based Training for LMS delivery must be Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) compliant. • SCORM compliance enables system tracking of learner progress through online content.

  16. Enterprise Learning Management System

  17. Enterprise Learning Management System Summary • This is the State of Connecticut’s enterprisemodel Learning Management System. • Administrators can enable and disable features according to business needs. • Instructors may focus on content quality & standards and not worry about logistics of delivery. • Agencies can demonstrate compliance with Federal training mandates with the click of a mouse button. • Learners gain flexibility to manage training. Individuals decide where and when to acquire LMS content.

More Related