30 likes | 53 Views
If your franchisee attorney only handles franchisees cases, he will consistently be referring the negotiation and renewal clauses of franchise agreement from the franchisees’ perspective. He will always attempt to maximize the flexibility of franchisees when it comes to going for renewing option or not. If he is representing franchisor then he should spend maximum time in drafting the franchise agreement in such a manner that his client has maximum authority over the agreement.
E N D
Why Should You Only Hire A Franchisee Attorney? Whether you are thinking to buy a franchise or you are experiencing a legal dispute with your franchisor, all you have to do is to hire a legal representative. It means you have to hire a lawyer who devotes his good time in practicing franchise law and handling franchise-related issues. It is crucial that you hire a legal advisor who exclusively represents franchisees for a number of reasons. Three reasons to hire only a franchisee attorney who exclusively represents franchisees: Here are three main reasons why franchisees of old or new type should only consider hiring a legal advisor whose practice only includes franchisees and not franchisors. 1. Look into the dispute from the perspective of franchisee First of all, when an attorney divides his time between representing two clients of different bases, he has to split his time between protecting the interests of those different client bases. The dispute becomes bigger when the interest of each client is diametrically opposed to other. Let’s understand this increasingly- complex issue of franchise renewal with an example.
If your franchisee attorney only handles franchisees cases, he will consistently be referring the negotiation and renewal clauses of franchise agreement from the franchisees’ perspective. He will always attempt to maximize the flexibility of franchisees when it comes to going for renewing option or not. If he is representing franchisor then he should spend maximum time in drafting the franchise agreement in such a manner that his client has maximum authority over the agreement. 2. No Interest Conflicts Apart from this issue, when a lawyer represents both franchisors and franchisees in the process of litigation, there is a big possibility that he will try his level best in finding a middle way that is beneficial to his franchisee clients. For example, imagine there is a dispute between franchisor and franchisee over a non-competition clause in which the attorney of the franchisor successfully puts his point that court should enforce the law generously. Just think that this is the same lawyer
you have selected to represent you as a franchisee in the court. Now, suddenly your lawyer has made your way more difficult to establish an independent business as soon as your term of franchise agreement expires. 3.Representing franchisees is a mainstream business Last but not the least, at several firms of franchise law where the best franchisee attorney and franchisor attorney work together, representing franchisees is not considered as a mainstream business. In comparison to franchisees, franchisors are seen as larger clients and so they are served in a better way by legal advisors. Lawyers at these firms may rarely do the reviews of the franchise or represent the franchisees in litigation, but it doesn’t mean these lawyers have nothing to offer to franchisees. For More Information Visit Here: Click here for visit our website:www.franchise-law.com