340 likes | 360 Views
Authentication and Authorization. CS795/895. How .Net Security Works. Users who log in to the application are granted a principal and an identity , based on the credentials they have provided.
E N D
Authentication and Authorization CS795/895
How .Net Security Works • Users who log in to the application are granted a principal and an identity, based on the credentials they have provided. • Principal object: Represents the group or role membership of the authenticated user, i.e. security context of the current user. It is possible to create a generic principal object using data from a database. Httpcontext.Current.User property returns an instance of IPrincipal. • Identity object represents the authenticated user. Windows authentication uses WindowsIdentity while forms authentication uses FormsIdentity object. • http://www.developerland.com/Web/Security/215.aspx
IPrincipal Interface • HttpContext.Current.User property returns an instance of IPrincipal • It is part of System.Security.Principal • Has a single property: Identity: Gets the IIdentity of the current Principal: Example: HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name • Has single method: IsInRole(roleName As String): Example: if (HttpContext.Current.User.IsInRole(“Admin”) {…..}
IIdentity Interface • Provides current user’s identity • Four identity classes included in .Net: • System.Web.Security.WindowsIdentity • System.Web.Security.FormsIdentity • System.Web.Security.PassportIdentity • System.Web.Security.GenericIdentity
Types of Authentication • Windows Authentication • Forms Authentication • Extending Forms Authentication • .Net Passport Authentication • Custom Authentication
Windows Authentication • Why this type? • Little work for programmer • Integrates well with IIS security • Integration with windows client machine---no need for a user to authenticate for an application if already done so initially by the windows OS • Why not this type? • Tied to windows users • Tied to windows client M/C • Lack of flexibility
How does it work? • Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 is a powerful Web server that provides a highly reliable, manageable, and scalable Web application infrastructure for all versions of Windows Server 2003. • IIS uses three possible strategies to authenticate each request it receives: • Basic authentication: Username and password in clear text • Digest authentication: Username and password protected with digests • Integrated windows authentication: The identity of a user already logged in to Windows is passed automatically, without user entering it again
Basic Authentication • IIS obtains logon info from an HTTP client via the familiar windows dialog box to obtain username and password • The information is then transmitted to the web server • It then attempts to login to the windows account with the username and password • It also checks if the account is allowed to access the requested file/directory • If successful, the response rendered by web server is returned to the HTTP client • Weakness: Username + password data between client and server is encoded into a string that intruders may have access to. So it is preferable to use if SSL-like secure mechanism is used in between.
Digest Authentication • Like basic authentication, it requires user to enter username/password. • Instead of sending the password in clear, it sends a digest of the password. • The HTTP client creates a hash value of the password, the nonce sent by the HTTP server, and some other values. This hash is the digest • The HTTP server uses the stored password for the username to generate the hash (digest) and verifies it.
Integrated Windows Authentication • Most popular among the simple authentication schemes • For users who have already logged into a Windows machine • Provides WAN or LAN based internet applications with an authentication practice that is virtually invisible to the user • A domain controller provides user credentials to the client station where user log in. • These credentials are in turn transferred to the IIS at the request server
Configuring ASP.Net to use Windows Authentication • In web.config, set <authentication mode = “windows”> • This creates a WindowsPrincipal object and a WindowsIdentity object, with each request • User.Identity.Name provides user name • WindowsPrincipal.IsInRole methods lets us test if the user has a specific role
Forms Authentication • Here, an HTML form is used for users to enter their credentials • Similar to cookie authentication---where when a user’s credentials (username and password) are verified, a cookie is set. Subsequent requests use this cookie to identify the user.
Why Use Forms Authentication? • Keeps all authentication code within the application • We have full control over the appearance of the login form • Works for users with any browser • Allows us to decide how to store user information (by default stored in web.config file but can be stored anywhere)
Why not Forms authentication? • We have to create our own interface for users to log in • We have to maintain user details ourselves • Resources protected by forms authentication must be processed by ASP.Net (i.e., anonymous access bypassing ASP.Net is not possible)
How forms authentication works? • When request is made to a page protected by forms authentication, the user is redirected to a login page. The URL of the original request is preserved. • Login page contains a form for users to enter their credentials (e.g., username and password) • If the details the user entered are correct, an “Authentication ticket” is created. The ticket contains the encrypted details of the user. The ticket is written into a cookie and sent to the client machine. • The user is then redirected back to the URL they originally requested. Now the authentication cookie is added to the request by the browser and picked up by the authentication module. • The URL authorization module uses the details to verify user and provide access
Forms Authentication API • FormsAuthenticationModule class: To do the background work with the presented authentication ticket or cookie (done automatically); HTTP module that works in background • FormsAuthentication class: Contains utility methods and properties that we can use when implementing forms authentication • FormsIdentity: An implementation of IIdentity • FormsAuthenticationTicket class: Represents the details of a user that we will encrypt and write to the authentication cookie. • These are all in System.Web.Security namespace
Implementing Forms Authentication • Step 1: Configure forms authentication in the web.config file: <authentication mode = “forms”> <forms name=“xyzApplication” --- unique name for the cookie loginUrl=“secure/login.aspx” ---page to which user should be directed timeout=“30”---length of time in minutes an authentication cookie is valid Path=“/” ---path for the cookie for the browsers Protection=“all” ---do both encryption and a MAC for the cookie <credentials passwordFormat =“clear”> <user name =“xyz” password=“dqunik” /> <username =“pqr” password = “ghwww” /> </credentials> </forms> </authentication>
Implementing Forms Authentication (Cont.) • Step 2: Create a login form to enable users to enter their credentials • Login.aspx HTML page that handles the entering and validating the user name/password • Login.aspx.cs class that has the business logic for the login. private viod LoginButton_Click(0bject sender, System.EventArgs s) {//Check credentials If (FormsAuthentications.Authenticate (UserNameTextBox.Text, passwordTextBox.Value)) {FormsAuthentication.RedirectFromLOginPage (UserNameTextBox.Text, false);}---not a persistent cookie Else {ErrorMessageLabel.Visible= true;}
Later: More on other Authentication features • http://www.ondotnet.com/pub/a/dotnet/2003/01/06/formsauthp1.html
Implementing Authorization • Granting access to resources using user names or roles • Roles are similar to groups in Unix and Windows • Application may define its own roles or use Windows roles • In ASP.Net, the authorization starts from what ASPX pages the user is allowed to access • ASP.Net provides some generic types of solutions: E.g., File Authorization, URL Authorization, and Custom Authorization
How Identity and Principal are used? • Types of identities (as we have already seen), depending on authentication used: WindowsIdentity, FormsIdentity, PassportIdentity, GenericIdentity • All these implement IIdentity interface (part of System.Security.Principal namespace) • An application may always find the user attached to the current thread using Identity object • Principal: a combination of user and groups the user belongs to (Identity+roles) • Principal types: WindowsPrincipal and GeneraicPrincipal • Both implement IPrincipal interface (part of System.Security.Principal namespace) • IPrincipal (as discussed before) provides the following: • IIdentity Identity (get): to get the underlying object • IsInRole(string role): to determine whether the user belongs to a certain role
Role-based Security • In general, authorization requirements are as follows: • Users should have proper credentials to access a resource • Certain users need to be denied access to particular resources • Only certain users should be allowed to access particular resources • If you intend to use RBS, you must either assign an IPrincipal to a thread manually or configure the runtime to create one automatically • Use System.AppDomain.SetThreadPrincipal to automatically generate for each thread, or • Set current thread’s IPrincipal manually using System.Thredaing.Thread.CurrentPrincipal property.
Making Role-based Security Demands • Do not result in a stack walk---based solely on identity and roles of the active thread’s principal • Imperative role-based security statements: • Commonly used constructor: PrincipalPermission • Each PrincipalPermission can specify only a single role name. “null” means no matching is needed • Public PrincipalPermission(string name, string role) PrincipalPermission p1 = new PrincipalPermission(“John”, “Manager”); p1.Demand(); PrincipalPermission p2 = new PrincipalPermission(null, “Programmer”); p2.Demand(); PrincipalPermission p3 = new PrincipalPermission(“Kevin”, null); p3.Demand(); PrinciplaPermission Explanationhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.security.permissions.principalpermission.aspx
Using Declarative role-based security statements: • PrincipalPermissionAttribute may be applied to classes, methods, properties, or events to force declarative demands • This cannot be applied at the assemble level • Demand, LinkDemand, and InheritanceDemand are the only RBS statements allowed [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Name=“John”, Role=“Manager”)] [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role=“Programmer”)] [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Name=“Kevin”)]
File Authorization • FileAuthorizationModule class uses the underlying ACLs of the file system to control access to ASPX pages • This works only in conjunction with Windows Authentication • Example: • Create a new web application. Name the form Index.aspx • Place the following code under the <form> tag: <a href =“AuthorizedFile.aspx”> Click here for AuthorizedFile </a> <br> <a href =“UnAuthorizedFile.aspx”> Click here for UnAuthorizedFile </a> 3. Add two new web forms: AuthorizedFile.aspx and UnAuthorizedFile.aspx 4. Under <form> tag in AuthorizedFile type: <h2> You have access to the file </h2> Under <form> tag in UnAuthorziedFile type: <h2> You do not have access to the file </h2> 5. Build the solution and run: Clicking the links, the messages will appear 6. Create three different users: user1, user2, user3 7. Provide the following access rights to UnauthorizedFile.aspx: user1: Full access; user2: Read and Execute; user3: Deny All 8. Login as user3 and click on UnAuthorizedFile link; it will be denied access
URL Authorization Authorization section in web.config <authorization> <allow users=“john,jim,kevin” roles=“programmer,manager” verbs =“GET,PUT”/> <deny users=“?” /> ? Anonymous users; * all users
Authorization for a specific file or folder (using web.config): <location path=“UnAuthorizedFile.aspx”> <system.web> <authorization> <deny users = “\localhost\user3” /> </authorization> </system.web> </location> (This overrides what the OS says about the permissions)
Calculation of Permissions • The default permission is to allow access for all users • Upon calculation of a merged rule set, the system checks the rules until it finds a match: either allow or deny • When a deny is encountered, the system throws a 401 error: Unauthorized access • Example: At the application level, include in web.config: <authorization> <allow users=“localhost\user1, \localhost\user2” /> <deny users = “?”/> </authorization> At a particular page level, we can add this to web.config: <location path=“UnAuthorizedFile.aspx”> <system.web> <authorization><deny roles = “users” /> </authorization> </system.web> </location> Denies access to this page to any windows user.
Authorization Checks in Code • We can control access even at a button level using checks in the code • If {user1, user2} are made into a single group called validgroup, then: if (Thread.CurrentPrincipal.IsInRole(“localhost\validgroup”)) {Response.Write (“You have access”);} else {Response.Redirect(“AuthorizationError.aspx”);}
Demanding Credentials try { PrincipalPermission pp = new PrincipalPermission(“user1”, “validgroup”); pp.Demand(); Response.Write(“PrincipalPermission successful”); } Catch (SecurityException se) {Response.Write (“PrincipalPermission Denied”); } Merging PrincipalPermission objects: try {PrincipalPermission pp1 = new PrincipalPermission(“user1”, “validgroup”); {PrincipalPermission pp2 = new PrincipalPermission(“user2”, “validgroup”); {PrincipalPermission pp3 = (PrincipalPermission)p1.Union (p2); pp3.Demand(); Response.Write(“PrincipalPermission successful”); } Catch (SecurityException se) {Response.Write (“PrincipalPermission Denied”); }
PrincipalPermissionAttribute: Another way to Authorize • Place the following code above the method declaration: [PrincipalPermissionAttribute(SecurityAction.Demand, Name=“user1”, Role = “validusers”)] Or [PrincipalPermissionAttribute(SecurityAction.Demand, Role = “validusers”)]
Custom Authorization • To be discussed later