610 likes | 627 Views
Explore the importance of clinical experiences in teacher preparation, with findings, recommendations, and essential elements for effective programs. Understand the impact on candidates’ learning and P-12 student support.
E N D
Clinical Experiences in Teacher PreparationMACTE Hope Conference Holland, MI April 5, 2018
What is “Clinical Experience”? • Linda Darling-Hammond (2014) • Extensive and intensely supervised work – tightly integrated with coursework – that allows candidates to learn from expert practice in schools and other settings that serve diverse students. • Immersing teacher candidates in the materials of practice and working on particular concepts using these materials to link theory and practice.
What is “Clinical Experience”? • Linda Darling-Hammond (2014) • Extensive and intensely supervised work – tightly integrated with coursework – that allows candidates to learn from expert practice in schools and other settings that serve diverse students. • Immersing teacher candidates in the materials of practice and working on particular concepts using these materials to link theory and practice.
Frame for Vision: End Product Definition of clinical experience Aspects clinical preparation must include Specific clinical experience requirements Policy considerations Model/s or examples
Non-Negotiables • PK-12 students first • Statewide • Clinical experience = one piece of preparation continuum • Diversity of experiences • Gradual Release of Responsibility • Research-based Decisions
Tensions • Different requirements for different endorsements • Student teaching permits • Diversity of placement: access, support, mentoring • Multiple initial and/or additional endorsements • Educator evaluation/effectiveness ratings • Financial constraints/systemic restraints
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education Blue Ribbon Panel Report (2010)
Linda Darling Hammond (2014)Findings • Candidates who have clinical experience alongside coursework are better able to: • Understand theory • Apply concepts from coursework • Support P-12 student learning
Linda Darling Hammond (2014)Findings • Candidates’ learning influenced by: • Care taken in choosing placements • Quality of teacher practice modeled • Quality and frequency of school based mentoring • Quality and intensity of university supervision and evaluation tools
Linda Darling Hammond (2014) Recommendations • Areas of focus for more powerful preparation programs: • Coherence and integration • Explicit links between theory and practice • Quality and intensity of supervision and evaluation tools • Immersing teachers in the materials of practice • New relationships with schools
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE)Clinical Practice Commission 2018 • In continuation of NCATE Blue Ribbon Panel Work • Creates a Lexicon of Practice • Calls for a “shared understanding of evidence-based practices for embedding teacher preparation in the PK-12 environment” • 10 Essential Proclamations For Highly Effective Clinical Educator Preparation
Ideal Clinical Program What should a clinically based teacher preparation program look like in an ideal system?
4 Types of Clinical Programs (Dennis, Burns, Tricarico, van Ingen, Jacobs, & Davis, 2017)
4 Types of Clinical Programs (Dennis, Burns, Tricarico, van Ingen, Jacobs, & Davis, 2017)
Supervised Directed Teaching (R 390.1123) • Practical experiences that address the standards and proficiencies for entry level teachers. • Minimum of 12 weeks (min 6 semester credit hours) • 30 clock hours of supervised teaching and observation equals 1 credit hour
Program Standards and Requirements • Early and ongoing • Inclusive of student teaching in the grade band • Under a qualified cooperating teacher and university supervisor • Addresses the standards
Additional Endorsements (390.1129(2)) • Approved course of study for endorsement includes: • Early and ongoing structured field experiences with diverse student populations and in diverse instructional settings. • 2019 – All programs must include field experiences
Rules-Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education-Rule 82 Link to rules
Accreditation Expectations • P-12 Partnerships • Clinical experiences in diverse settings across programs • Deliberate, carefully chosen experiences explicitly connected to the curriculum • Positive impact on P-12 learners
Surveyed EPIs about Clinical Preparation • Duration of placements • Locations (settings) of placements • Tasks • Faculty who support clinical practice • Feedback about systems
Surveyed EPIs about Clinical Preparation • 15 total responses • 13 complete surveys • Representative of all institutions • 8/15 (53%) Independent • 7/15 (47%) Public
Pre-student Teaching Clinical Hours Elementary programs tend to have the greatest number pre-student teaching clinical hours. Secondary programs tend to have the fewest number pre-student teaching clinical hours.
Student Teaching Clinical Hours 91% of elementary programs and 100% of secondary programs include one semester of student teaching in a full day setting. K-12 programs have the most variation, with 70% including one semester in a full day setting.
Variation • 74 % of programs use Gradual Release of Responsibility • 70% of programs require pre-student teaching candidates to have experiences across a range of different grade levels. • 70% of programs include oversight of candidate experiences by individual faculty member(s) with critical feedback in the design of the experience. • 30% of programs allow candidates to choose their student teaching placement.
70% of programs require pre-student teaching candidates to have experiences across a range of different grade levels.
What do candidates do in pre-student teaching clinical experiences? • At least 80% of programs surveyed explicitly require: • Classroom observation • Non-instructional interactions with students • Instruction of individual students • Small group instruction • Large group or whole class instruction
What do candidates do in pre-student teaching clinical experiences? • At least 50% of programs surveyed also explicitly require: • Video analysis of teaching with actual K-12 students • Authentic teaching with K-12 students including peer observation and feedback
74% of programs indicate Gradual Release of Responsibility (or graduated method) from cooperating teacher to candidate is used in experience design.
31% of programs permit candidates to select or prioritize schools for placement in experiences prior to student teaching.
70% of programs include oversight of candidate experiences by individual faculty member(s) with critical feedback in the design of the experience.
Common Modes of Feedback • Authentic teaching with K-12 students where teacher or supervisor provides feedback • Video analysis of teaching with actual K-12 students • Co-teaching with cooperating teacher • Co-teaching with cooperating teacher where teacher or supervisor provides feedback
Less Common Modes of Feedback • Virtual or simulated teaching experience, for example using TeachLive • Authentic teaching with K-12 students where peers observe and provide feedback • Other experiences (blog about experiences and provide peer feedback, virtual teaching with peer feedback)
30% of programs allow candidates to choose their student teaching placement.
Selection of cooperating teachers? • Teachers chosen in collaboration between school leadership and program at EPI • Teacher leaders identified by the school Teachers chosen by the principal • Teachers with 5 or more years of experience • Teachers who express interest • Teachers who were former candidates
91-100% of all university supervisors have been or currently are PK-12 teachers or administrators.