1 / 20

Data verification for light nuclei ( А < 30) ; Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70 ) ;

Testing of FENDL-3 for protons and deuterons A.V.Ignatyuk Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia. Data verification for light nuclei ( А < 30) ; Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70 ) ; Data for the zirconium group (70 < A < 100) ;

frayne
Download Presentation

Data verification for light nuclei ( А < 30) ; Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70 ) ;

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Testing of FENDL-3 for protons and deuteronsA.V.IgnatyukInstitute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia • Data verification for light nuclei (А < 30); • Data for the iron group nuclei (40 < A < 70); • Data for the zirconium group (70 < A < 100); • Data for heavy nuclei (A>150); • Conclusions. 2d CRP Meeting on FENDL3, Vienna, 22-26 April 2010

  2. Experimental data on the 14N(p,)11C reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  3. Experimental data on the 15N(p,n)15O reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  4. Experimental data on the 16O(p,)13N reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  5. Experimental data on the 14N(d,n)15O reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  6. Experimental data on the 27Al(p,x)22&24Na reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  7. Experimental data on the 27Al(d,x)22&24Na reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  8. Experimental data on the natFe(d,x) 56Co reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  9. Experimental data on the 64Ni(p,n)64Cu and 64Ni(d,2n)64Cu cross-sections in comparison with various calculations and the Pade-approximation of data

  10. Experimental data on the natCu(p,x) 62Zn reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  11. Experimental data on the natCu(p,x) 63Zn reaction cross section and their fit by the Pade approximation (the upper part). The EAF-2007 evaluation of the cross section is compared with the fitted curve in the bottom part.

  12. Experimental data for the 93Nb(d,2n)93mMo reaction cross-section in comparison with various calculations

  13. Experimental data for the 93Nb(d,pxn)(94-x)mNb cross-sections in comparison with various calculations

  14. Experimental data for the 165Ho(p,n)165Er crosssection in comparison with various calculations

  15. Experimental data for the 186W(d,2n)186Re crosssection in comparison with various calculations

  16. Experimental data for the 181Ta(d,2n)181Ta crosssection in comparison with various calculations

  17. Experimental data for the 181Ta(d,p)182Ta crosssection in comparison with various calculations

  18. Experimental data for the 197Au(d,p)198gAu crosssection in comparison with various calculations

  19. Experimental data for the 197Au(d,p)198gAu crosssection in comparison with various calculations

  20. Conclusions • For the proton-induced reactions a reasonable agreement between experimental data and the EAF-2007 evaluations was obtained in most cases. However, for some important materials the required accuracies of data should be estimated more accurately and compared with the available uncertainties of evaluations. • For the deuteron-induced reactions the EAF-2007 evaluations essentially underestimate the (d,p) reaction cross sections near threshold energies. EAF-2007 overestimate also systematically the (d,2n) cross sections around their maximum values and underestimate the high-energy tails of the (d,xn) cross sections. • For the high accuracy requests the improved evaluations would be recommended on the basis of the optimal data descriptions or more accurate estimations of the statistical model parameters. 2d CRP Meeting on FENDL3, Vienna, 22-26 April 2010

More Related