1 / 7

Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle

Work-Family Conflict, Policies, and the Job-Life Satisfaction Relationship: A Review and Directions for Organizational Behavior-Human Resources Research. Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle. Introduction of Topic. Good explanation of why study should be conducted

Download Presentation

Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Work-Family Conflict, Policies, and the Job-Life Satisfaction Relationship: A Review and Directions for Organizational Behavior-Human Resources Research Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle

  2. Introduction of Topic • Good explanation of why study should be conducted • Acknowledge existing relationship; results scattered • Goals of MA are clear • Interesting presentation of multiple viewpoints • Role conflict (WFC) and HR Policy

  3. Review of Past Research • 3 competing theories of work-family conflict • Helps frame current MA • Not tested as a moderator • Role conflict literature mostly W-->F Conflict • HR policy literature mostly F-->W Conflict • Authors address gaps in both literatures

  4. Inclusion Criteria • List of criteria is very specific • Used studies dating back to 60’s- outdated? • Used only published data in academic journals • Results may be inflated • No file drawer analysis conducted • Used H&S to cumulate results within studies • Reduced number of correlations; no thorough explanation • No Inter-Rater Reliability estimates

  5. Analyses • Used H&S • Corrected for sampling and measurement error for each individual study • Analyzed weighted and unweighted effect sizes • Many of the subgroup analyses were based on <30 studies • No credibility intervals reported • No type I error control for moderators

  6. Results • Results summarized well • Corrected correlations ranged from -.18 to -.37 for job satisfaction and -.25 to -.42 for life satisfaction • Report that bidirectional work-family measures may be best predictor of job sat. • Probably due to sampling error • If not, capitalizing on variance accounted for?

  7. Discussion • Excellent summary of findings and what they mean for policy makers • Call for future research on work-family conflict as a mediator between HR policies and satisfaction • Call for future studies to have more heterogeneous samples and more homogeneous measures

More Related