60 likes | 170 Views
AIDS Response in a Conservative Settings Environment Khadija T. MOALLA. I use PowerPoint to my advantage Projecting the best image Can you hear me? Can you see my slides? Are my slides also visible from the back of the room? AV-friendly meeting space. WHY, HOW and WHAT WHY?.
E N D
AIDS Response in a Conservative Settings Environment Khadija T. MOALLA • I use PowerPoint to my advantage • Projecting the best image • Can you hear me? • Can you see my slides? • Are my slides also visible from the back of the room? • AV-friendly meeting space
WHY, HOW and WHATWHY? AIDS is a human developmental challenge with a burden falling on the most vulnerable and least able to manage its long-term impacts. • The response requires major political will and commitment from top leadership of countries • The response should be: • Multi-sectorial; • Value based(solidarity, stewardship…) • Human Rights based: (Women, children, KAPs, migrants, refugees, IDPs, prisoners…) • Synergetic between networks.
HOW? • By dispelling Stigma: Stigma has to do with the way people see themselves (self-stigma), the others and the world. • 2 major actors: Media & Religious Leaders? • Added value of RLs as new actors in the AIDS scene: • Influence how people see the world. • Trusted by their constituencies. • Best outreach, much bigger than most NGOs. • Access to all classes of society and gender. • Free to use the interpretation of Holy texts in favor of people: “Faith in service of humanity”. • Once convinced, Men and women RLs are the best advocates for prevention, testing and treatment. • Discrimination: As gate keepers, they will give the green light to legislators to stop discrimination by modifying discriminatory or enacting new laws. • Advocate to stop violence against women, children and KAPs.
WHAT? • Spiral Dynamic • Gap between the communities and the elite • RL &FBOs preach/influence the communities • Transformed RLs playing the locomotive role? • Penal code that criminalize paid sex, same sex and drug use will need RL green light to be modified. • RLs need to emphasize religious values such as solidarity and stewardship for countries to remove travel restrictions. • Leadership methodology: Designing all projects using the Conscious Full Spectrum Approach.
CONCLUSION • RLs: special actor! Trust/trust and trust! • Secular v/ religious discourse/approaches! • Synergy between CSOs (NGOs/FBOs). • Stigma v/Condom. • Human Rights are indivisible so are people. • AIDS as entry point for Human Rights. • Confrontation between the secular and religious discourse doesn’t serve the cause. • New context: Extremist groups. • Support to RLs risk takers. • Empowering WRLs champion for a progressive interpretation of holy texts.