1 / 102

BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS INSIDE & OUTSIDE THE ACADEMY

BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS INSIDE & OUTSIDE THE ACADEMY. Jim Lassoie 10 th Annual Symposium on Teaching, Research, & Outreach SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry October 12, 2006. OVERVIEW for TODAY. BACKGROUND COMMENTS METAPHOR “CONCEPTUAL” THOUGHTS. OVERVIEW for TODAY.

frieda
Download Presentation

BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS INSIDE & OUTSIDE THE ACADEMY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS INSIDE & OUTSIDE THE ACADEMY Jim Lassoie 10th Annual Symposium on Teaching, Research, & Outreach SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry October 12, 2006

  2. OVERVIEWforTODAY • BACKGROUND COMMENTS • METAPHOR • “CONCEPTUAL” THOUGHTS

  3. OVERVIEWforTODAY • BACKGROUND COMMENTS • METAPHOR • “CONCEPTUAL” THOUGHTS • SOME PERSONAL EXAMPLES • RESEARCH • TEACHING • OUTREACH

  4. OVERVIEWforTODAY • BACKGROUND COMMENTS • METAPHOR • “CONCEPTUAL” THOUGHTS • SOME PERSONAL EXAMPLES • RESEARCH • TEACHING • OUTREACH • COMMENTS & DISCUSSION

  5. OVERVIEWforTODAY • BACKGROUND COMMENTS • A METAPHOR • “CONCEPTUAL” THOUGHTS • SOME PERSONAL EXAMPLES • RESEARCH • TEACHING • OUTREACH • COMMENTS & DISCUSSION

  6. Allegories of Education & Theology

  7. Allegories of Education & Theology

  8. ? ?

  9. TEACHING RESEARCH OUTREACH ESF

  10. TEACHING RESEARCH OUTREACH ESF PARTNERSHIPS

  11. Gov’t. Agencies TEACHING RESEARCH OUTREACH ESF NGOs PARTNERSHIPS

  12. The Public Gov’t. Agencies TEACHING RESEARCH OUTREACH ESF NGOs Institutions & Associations PARTNERSHIPS

  13. •

  14. •

  15. The Public Gov’t. Agencies ESF NGOs Institutions & Associations ?

  16. The Public Gov’t. Agencies ESF Participatory Research NGOs Institutions & Associations

  17. Participatory Approaches to Research • 1940s: Action Research • 1960s: Participatory Planning (Wilmsen 2006)

  18. Participatory Approaches to Research • 1940s: Action Research • 1960s: Participatory Planning • 1970s & 1980s: • Rapid Rural Appraisal • Farming Systems Research • Participatory Learning & Action • Agroforestry Diagnosis & Design (Wilmsen 2006)

  19. Participatory Approaches to Research • 1940s: Action Research • 1960s: Participatory Planning • 1970s & 1980s: • Rapid Rural Appraisal • Farming Systems Research • Participatory Learning & Action • Agroforestry Diagnosis & Design • 1980s & Beyond: • Participatory Action Research • CBNRM (Wilmsen 2006)

  20. Participatory Approaches to Research • 1940s: Action Research • 1960s: Participatory Planning • 1970s & 1980s: • Rapid Rural Appraisal • Farming Systems Research • Participatory Learning & Action • Agroforestry Diagnosis & Design • 1980s & Beyond: • Participatory Action Research • CBNRM (Wilmsen 2006)

  21. Participatory Approaches to Research • 1940s: Action Research • 1960s: Participatory Planning • 1970s & 1980s: • Rapid Rural Appraisal • Farming Systems Research • Participatory Learning & Action • Agroforestry Diagnosis & Design • 1980s & Beyond: • Participatory Action Research • CBNRM (Wilmsen 2006)

  22. ____________ Full Participation (Wilmsen 2006) No Participation

  23. ____________ Full Participation • SPECIFICITY • ACCURACY BUT IS MORE ALWAYS BETTER ? No Participation

  24. ____________ Full Participation • SPECIFICITY • ACCURACY • USABILITY • ACCOUNTABILITY BUT IS MORE ALWAYS BETTER ? No Participation

  25. ____________ Full Participation • SPECIFICITY • ACCURACY • USABILITY • ACCOUNTABILITY • NEW RESOURCES • INTERESTING BUT IS MORE ALWAYS BETTER ? No Participation

  26. ____________ Full Participation • SPECIFICITY • ACCURACY • USABILITY • ACCOUNTABILITY • NEW RESOURCES • INTERESTING • OTHERS? BUT IS MORE ALWAYS BETTER ? No Participation

  27. ____________ More Participation Less Participation (Wilmsen 2006)

  28. ____________ More Participation ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Less Participation (Wilmsen 2006)

  29. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Less Participation (Wilmsen 2006)

  30. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation (Wilmsen 2006)

  31. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Surveys & Opinion Polls “Basic” Research Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation (Wilmsen 2006)

  32. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Technical Research for a Partner Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation (Wilmsen 2006)

  33. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Technical Research for a Partner Partner Decides Not to Participate Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation

  34. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research “Citizen” Science ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Technical Research for a Partner Partner Decides Not to Participate Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation

  35. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research “Citizen” Science ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Technical Research for a Partner Partner Decides Not to Participate Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation

  36. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research “Citizen” Science ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Technical Research for a Partner Partner Decides Not to Participate Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation

  37. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research “Citizen” Science Time ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Technical Research for a Partner Partner Decides Not to Participate Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation

  38. ____________ More Participation Participatory Action Research “Citizen” Science Time ________________ More Reciprocity Less Reciprocity Technical Research for a Partner Community Decides Not to Participate Token & Manipulative Research Less Participation

More Related