1 / 8

LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY

LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY. Relevant FREP questions. Are ecosystems represented across the landscape in time and space? Is there a sufficient degree of connectivity among ecosystems?

frieda
Download Presentation

LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY

  2. Relevant FREP questions • Are ecosystems represented across the landscape in time and space? • Is there a sufficient degree of connectivity among ecosystems? • Are stand-level management objectives for maintaining biological diversity (e.g., retention of wildlife trees and coarse woody debris) adequately contributing to the maintenance of diverse ecosystems over the landscape?

  3. Milestones • Initial scoping papers completed (L.Kremsater) (May-July 2006) • Working group established (Sept 2006) • Review, revision and prioritization of “DART” tool and indicators (Dec 2006) • Project Charter developed (draft) (Jan 2007)

  4. Draft Project Objectives TWO Inter-related projects • To provide quantitative data on a range of indicators which are generally accepted as important elements of “patterns of natural disturbance”. • To provide landscape-level context to stand-level biodiversity RSM data through pilot effectiveness evaluations. How……Proposed Pilots which will • Critically assess the pilot approach, and apply this knowledge to developing standardized procedures for future effectiveness evaluations.

  5. Goal #1: Evaluating biodiversity attributes using current DART indicators

  6. Goal #2: Putting FREP stand-level data into a landscape context • directed by the goals of stand-level retention and what is being monitored at the stand-level • need to know the distribution of important stand level elements across the landscape (i.e., snags, big trees, and large CWD) • Need to develop predictive “attribute trajectories” for different stand ages and forest types for these elements • Data from: literature values, cruise data, stand-level FREP data • Compare predicted “natural” abundance of these structures to actual FREP field data – how well are we doing?

  7. Next steps • Update DART code to meet current software standards • Modify DART logic model to incorporate new/revised indicators and FREP objectives • Develop trajectories for each of the stand level elements • Pilot implementation in Prince George TSA and Sunshine Coast TSA

More Related