1 / 47

ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics

ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics. Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University ayresv@msu.edu. Lecture 02, 03 Sep 13. In Chapter 01 in Datta: Two dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) DEG goes down, mobility goes up Define mobility (and momentum relaxation)

gabaldon
Download Presentation

ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECE 802-604:Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University ayresv@msu.edu

  2. Lecture 02, 03 Sep 13 In Chapter 01 in Datta: Two dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) DEG goes down, mobility goes up Define mobility (and momentum relaxation) One dimensional electron gas (1-DEG) Special Schrödinger eqn (Con E) that accommodates: Confinement to create 1-DEG Useful external B-field Experimental measure for mobility VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  3. Lecture 02, 03 Sep 13 Two dimensional electron gas (2-DEG): Datta example: GaAs-Al0.3Ga0.7As heterostructure HEMT VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  4. MOSFET Sze VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  5. HEMT IOP Science website; Tunnelling- and barrier-injection transit-time mechanisms of terahertz plasma instability in high-electron mobility transistors 2002 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17 1168 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  6. For both, the channel is a 2-DEG that is created electronically by band-bending MOSFET 2 x yBp = VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  7. For both, the channel is a 2-DEG that is created electronically by band-bending HEMT VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  8. Example: Find the correct energy band-bending diagram for a HEMT made from the following heterojunction. p-type GaAs Heavily doped n-type Al0.3Ga0.7As Moderately doped EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 Eg2 = 1.798 eV = 1.424 eV EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  9. p-type GaAs Heavily doped n-type Al0.3Ga0.7As Moderately doped EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 Eg2 = 1.798 eV = 1.424 eV EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  10. Evac Evac qc2 qfm2 qc1 qfm1 EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 Eg2 EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  11. Electron affinities qc for GaAs and AlxGa1-xAs can be found on Ioffe Evac Evac qc2 qfm2 qc1 qfm1 EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 Eg2 EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  12. True for all junctions: align Fermi energy levels: EF1 = EF2. This brings Evac along too since electron affinities can’t change VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  13. Put in Junction J, nearer to the more heavily doped side: Junction J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  14. Join Evac smoothly: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  15. Anderson Model: Use qc1 “measuring stick” to put in EC1: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  16. Use qc1 “measuring stick” to put in EC1: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  17. Result so far: EC1 band-bending: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  18. Use qc2 “measuring stick” to put in EC2: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  19. Use qc2 “measuring stick” to put in EC2: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  20. Results so far: EC1 and EC2 band-bending: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  21. Put in straight piece connector: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  22. Keeping the electron affinities correct resulted in a triangular quantum well in EC (for this heterojunction combination): J DEC In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  23. Use the energy bandgap Eg1 “measuring stick” to relate EC1 and EV1: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  24. Use the energy bandgap Eg1 “measuring stick” to relate EC1 and EV1: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  25. Result: band-bending for EV1: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  26. Use the energy bandgap Eg2 “measuring stick” to put in EV2: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  27. Use the energy bandgap Eg2 “measuring stick” to put in EV2: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  28. Results: band-bending for EV1 and EV2: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  29. Put in straight piece connector: J DEC DEV Note: for this heterojunction: DEC > DEV VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  30. Put in straight piece connector: J DEC DEV DEC = D(electron affinities) = qc2 – qc1 (Anderson model) DEV = ( E2 – E1 ) - DEC => DEgap = DEC + DEV VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  31. Put in straight piece connector: J DEC DEV “The difference in the energy bandgaps is accommodated by amount DEC in the conduction band and amount DEV in the valence band.” VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  32. J DEC DEV NO quantum well in EV NO quantum well for holes VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  33. Correct band-bending diagram: J DEC DEV VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  34. Is the Example the same as the example in Datta? HEMT VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  35. No. The L-R orientation is trivial but the starting materials are different Our example Datta example VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  36. Orientation is trivial. The smaller bandgap material is always “1” Our example Datta example VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  37. HEMT Physical region In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band. 2-DEG Allowed energy levels VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  38. Example: Which dimension (axis) is quantized? z Which dimensions form the 2-DEG? x and y Physical region In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band. 2-DEG Allowed energy levels VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  39. Example: Which dimension is quantized? Which dimensions form the 2-DEG? Physical region In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band. 2-DEG Allowed energy levels VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  40. Example: approximate the real well by a one dimensional triangular well in z ∞ Using information from ECE874 Pierret problem 2.7 (next page), evaluate the quantized part of the energy of an electron that occupies the 1st energy level VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  41. VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  42. U(z) = az z VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  43. n = ? m = ? a = ? VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  44. n = 0 for 1st m = meff for conduction band e- in GaAs. At 300K this is 0.067 m0 a = ? VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  45. Your model for a = asymmetry ? U(z) = 3/2 z U(z) = 1 z z VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  46. D. L. Mathine, G. N. Maracas, D. S. Gerber, R. Droopad, R. J. Graham, and M. R. McCartney. Characterization of an AlGaAs/GaAs asymmetric triangular quantum well grown by a digital alloy approximation. J. Appl. Phys. 75, 4551 (1994) An asymmetric triangular quantum well was grown by molecular‐beam epitaxy using a digital alloy composition grading method. A high‐resolution electron micrograph (HREM), a computational model, and room‐temperature photoluminescence were used to extract the spatial compositional dependence of the quantum well. The HREM micrograph intensity profile was used to determine the shape of the quantum well. A Fourier series method for solving the BenDaniel–Duke Hamiltonian [D. J. BenDaniel and C. B. Duke, Phys. Rev. 152, 683 (1966)] was then used to calculate the bound energy states within the envelope function scheme for the measured well shape. These calculations were compared to the E11h, E11l, and E22l transitions in the room‐temperature photoluminescence and provided a self‐consistent compositional profile for the quantum well. A comparison of energy levels with a linearly graded well is also presented VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

  47. Jin Xiao (金晓), Zhang Hong (张红), Zhou Rongxiu (周荣秀) and Jin Zhao (金钊). Interface roughness scattering in an AlGaAs/GaAs triangle quantum well and square quantum well. Journal of Semiconductors Volume 34 072004, 2013 We have theoretically studied the mobility limited by interface roughness scattering on two-dimensional electrons gas (2DEG) at a single heterointerface (triangle-shaped quantum well). Our results indicate that, like the interface roughness scattering in a square quantum well, the roughness scattering at the AlxGa1−xAs/GaAs heterointerface can be characterized by parameters of roughness height Δ and lateral Λ, and in addition by electric field F. A comparison of two mobilities limited by the interface roughness scattering between the present result and a square well in the same condition is given VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

More Related