140 likes | 304 Views
Moving Research to Reality. Advances in NASPAC Innovations in NAS-wide Simulation Workshop George Mason University January 27 th - 28 th 2010 Lakshmi Vempati. CSSI, Inc. Headquarters 400 Virginia Avenue, SW • Suite 210 • Washington, DC 20024
E N D
Moving Research to Reality Advances in NASPAC Innovations in NAS-wide Simulation Workshop George Mason University January 27th - 28th 2010 Lakshmi Vempati CSSI, Inc. Headquarters400 Virginia Avenue, SW • Suite 210 • Washington, DC 20024 202.863.2175 • 202.863.7400 fax • 888.275.0862 toll-free www.cssiinc.com
Outline • Introduction • NASPAC Current Architecture • Recent Enhancements • Oceanic Operations • Terminal Area Modeling • Closing comments
Introduction • National Airspace System Performance Analysis Capability (NASPAC) • System-wide model developed in the 1980’s • Discrete event simulation representing the NAS as a network of interconnected queues • Used for cost-benefit analysis • Technical and software support provided by CSSI and Metron for the FAA (Joe Post)
Oceanic Operations • Model separation of aircraft in US oceanic airspace through the use of restrictions • Oceanic regions modeled (with updated find crossings module) • Oakland oceanic (ZOA), • New York oceanic (ZNY) and • Anchorage oceanic (ZAN) sectors 10 and 11. • Challenges • No geometry information in the simulation engine • Limitation of existing find crossings module to NW quadrant of the globe only • Pre processing and data requirements • Process and merge ATOP FPL with FZ where necessary and cleanse data • Compile international waypoint data into NASPAC readable format • Sector definitions for New York, Oakland and Anchorage • Oceanic separation standards lookup based on • Equipage • Oceanic Region
Filed waypoint + filed cruise altitude used by 2 or more flights • Restriction • All headings (0-359) • All airport pairs • For entire day • 10 min in trail separation • ± 500 ft altitude bounds above or below the target filed cruise altitude Yes Gate Finder Sector names Gate Finder Input schedule Sector definitions • Gate Finder to generate restrictions • Un-capacitated US oceanic sectors for Oakland (ZOA), New York (ZNY), and Anchorage (ZAN) fully functional with newer sector crossings module • Restriction generated at any "filed waypoint + filed cruise altitude" in the schedule used by 2 or more flights
Oceanic Operations: Example restrictions • Restrictions created for one NASPAC schedule: • Vertically-oriented lines represent restrictions created on oceanic network waypoints • Horizontally-oriented lines represent restrictions on all other waypoints
Terminal Area Modeling • Incorporate SID/STAR/IAP routes into flight schedules and integrate into trajectory modeler to support modeling altitude restrictions (level-offs) • Challenges • SID/STAR/IAP definitions are updated every 56 days. • Not all procedure definitions are included in the National Flight Database. Example SIDs with non-structured routing • SID/STAR/IAP charts contain extensive information in free text as well as graphically. Not all information is captured in the database. • Special cases: • Altitude restrictions based on direction of arrival e.g. KORD Janesville 5 Arrival • Procedures applicable to: Aircraft type (e.g. Turboprop, Turbojet), Equipage (e.g. DME, GPS), Speed restrictions (e.g. 250K, 280K), Time of day, Runway use (e.g. R12L fly at 10000) • Expect to cross at lowest available altitude (e.g. KEWR Williamsport 5Arrival) • Combination of multiple aircraft type, multiple runway altitude restrictions (e.g. KBOS Gardner 3 Arrival) • Existing schedule filed waypoint inconsistencies • Field 10 parsing issues • Issues with merging existing routes with SID/STAR/IAP
Has SID/STAR Input schedule No Modified schedule Field 10 Parser Assigning/Merging Algorithm Yes Lookup SID/STAR Implementation Assign Sid/Star/IAP Database Merge • Pre-processing and data requirements • Field 10 (Route of flight information) • SID/STAR/IAP definitions • Supplemental information from aeronautical charts • Parse field10, lookup SID/STAR when specified and merge into waypoints list • Assignment and Merging Algorithm
SID/STAR Assignment Examples ATL Departures IAD Arrivals
Closing comments • Initial oceanic restrictions and in trail separations (distance and time-based) implemented • Initial SID/STAR routing, assignment and merging • Ongoing efforts: • Oceanic in-trail climb/descent • IAP assignment • Full integration into NASPAC
Moving Research to Reality Backup Slides CSSI, Inc. Headquarters400 Virginia Avenue, SW • Suite 210 • Washington, DC 20024 202.863.2175 • 202.863.7400 fax • 888.275.0862 toll-free www.cssiinc.com