1 / 16

Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric

Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric. DESY - Zeuthen. MEASUREMENT OF TGC IN e  COLLISIONS AT TESLA. T E S L A. INTRODUCTION. In order to predict the precision of measurement of trilinear gauge couplings (TGC) at a photon collider : signal to background separation study ( e  W )

gaius
Download Presentation

Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric DESY - Zeuthen MEASUREMENT OF TGC IN e COLLISIONS AT TESLA

  2. T E S L A INTRODUCTION In order to predict the precision of measurement of trilinear gauge couplings (TGC) at a photon collider : • signal to background separation study(e W) for real and parasitic e -mode • observables sensitive to TGC (angular distributions, cross-sections …) • estimated errors, and of measurement of and  parameters, obtained by fit-minimizing the 2value - effect of photon beam polarization on  and  measurement 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  3. T E S L A EVENT SELECTION TOOLS: PYTHIAevent generator SIMDETV3detector simulation • sample of 105 mixed signal and background events, generated with PYTHIA at ECM (e)= 450 GeV background for real andparasitice-mode: e  W qqT  37 pb e  eZ0  eqqT  3.5 pb  qqT  137 pb   WW  lqq T  82 pb   qq T  128 pb • response of a detector simulated with SIMDET V3 • Ws are reconstructed from hadronic final states 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  4. T E S L A sufficientlyhigh W production cross-section allows us to efficiently separate signal from background • Applied cuts: • acceptance of detector - 7°  qq e  W e  eZ0 • angular distributions for signal and bck. hadronic final states • W energy • (100-250) Gev • hadronic final states energy spectrum 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  5. T E S L A  qq e  W e  eZ0 • W mass • (60-100) Gev High efficiency for hadronic channel,84% with low background • hadronic final states mass spectrum • final angular distributions after selection 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  6. T E S L A Background for parasitic e mode :   WW  lqq same cuts as previous qq • Applied cuts: • acceptance of detector - 7° e  W   qq   WW angular distribution • W energy • (100-250) Gev energy distribution 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  7. T E S L A • W mass • (60-100) Gev qq W WW mass distribution S/BWW~ 9:1, purity ~ 90% angular distribution after selection 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  8. T E S L A OBSERVABLES SENSITIVE TO TGC total and differential cross-section • analytic formula for total (differential) cross-section (A. Denner, A.Dittmaier, Nucl.Phys. B398 (1993)239 • helicity amplitudes for different initial photon and final W states (E.Yehudai, Phys.Rev. D11(44)1991)) • differential cross-section distribution over the decay angle (Bilenkyat al.,Nuc.Phys. B(409) (1993)22 • WHIZARD Monte Carlo tree–level generator (W.Kilian,University of Karlsruhe) 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  9. T E S L A ANOMALOUS TGC can affect the total production cross-section and the shape of the differential cross-section DCS in presence of anomalous coupling for J= ± 1 state normalized to its SM value DCS for J = ±1 state in SM 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  10. T E S L A Contribution of each helicity state of the W boson  affects the distribution of their decay products 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  11. T E S L A MONTE CARLO FIT • WHIZARD Monte Carlo generator,106mixed pairs (du-bar and sc-bar)at ECM = 450 GeV, fixed photon-beam energy, polarized beams (P=100%), anomalous couplings • for each event we observe 3 kinematic variables • -W production angle with respect to the e- beam direction -cosθ • -W polar decay angle - angle of the fermion with respect to the W flight direction measured in the W rest frame –cosθ1 • -azimuthal decay angle  of the fermion with respect to a plane defined by W and the beam axis • Monte Carlo SM events are reweighted with function R()(and  are free parameters) R() = 1 + A· + B· + C·()2 + D·()2 + E ·  02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  12. T E S L A • 2D (over cosθ, cosθ1)and 3D(over cosθ, cosθ1,)cross-section distributions are fitted L-error on the luminosity measurement norm-normalization constant 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  13. T E S L A • Estimated errors of andfor +1 photon polarization state (P=100%) – single parameter 2D and 3D fit 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  14. T E S L A =1.01 • - distribution slightly decreaseserror of (L = 1%) and of  • for a factor 7 ! •  shape sensitivity in phi distribution •  phi distribution influences much more on  • 3D - Mean error on comes from • L, not case for  • - Good agreement between 2 modes for and  =0.01 =-0.01 =0.99 2 2D 3D  02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  15. T E S L A • Polarization influence on  and  •  variation of laser polarization in the laser wave •  beam field influences the photon polarization • sample with P=+0.9 polarized photons •  mixing the events with P=+1 and P=-1 in order to get preferred polarization (95:5) •  errors obtained from the fit are in a good agreement with previous ones • sample with 1% different polarization •  increased the Nev with P=-1 for 10%  increase of Nev correspond to the P=+0.89  test-fit and … • we found :1% changes in polarization(accurate fit) •  within ~ 12 •   within~ 1 • Contribution from normalization and from polarization J 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

  16. T E S L A SUMMARY • -Efficient signal to background separationfor both e modes • -,~ 10-3(error on luminosity measurement, L, • is included) • - Main contribution to the error ofcomes from L • Shape sensitivity for anomalous  in phi distribution decreases error of • Variable polarization (1%) affects the measurement • Future plans : • Variable photon-beam energy in WHIZARD • Resolution on reconstructed variables • Background influences on error predictions 02/04/2003, Amsterdam

More Related