280 likes | 476 Views
SCEIS Mission. Standardize and streamline business processes Integrate government services and information systems of SCAdopt proven, best business practices in public sectorAchieve a more cost effective and efficient delivery of service for stakeholdersFinance, Procurement, Budgeting, Human Re
E N D
1. South Carolina Enterprise Information SystemSCEIS
2. SCEIS Mission Standardize and streamline business processes
Integrate government services and information systems of SC
Adopt proven, best business practices in public sector
Achieve a more cost effective and efficient delivery of service for stakeholders
Finance, Procurement, Budgeting, Human Resources
Access to timely, accurate and complete information
Revolutionize the way SC government works for its citizens
3. WHAT?
4. SAP Includes Back Office Functionality Financials
Budget Execution – Funds Management
Project and Grant Management
General Ledger
Accounts Payable/Receivables
Cash Management and Treasury
Asset Management
Travel Management
Purchasing
Inventory Management
Budget Preparation
“What If” Analysis
Budget Modeling and Planning Human Resources/Payroll
Organization and Position Management
Personnel Administration
Personnel Development and Training
Recruitment and Applicant Tracking
Compensation Management
Benefits Administration
Time Management
Grievance Tracking
EMPLOYEE SELF SERVICE (ESS)
Payroll: Payroll Processing
Work Flow
Data Warehouse for SAP
5. New SAP Product Suite – mySAP ERP 2004 NetWeaver
SAP Enterprise Portal
SAP Business Intelligence
SAP Exchange Infrastructure runtime
SAP Mobile Infrastructure
SAP Auto-ID Infrastructure
SAP Web Application Server
SAP Solution Manager
SAP Composite Application
SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio
SAP Treasury and Risk Mgmt.
Transaction manager (asset mgmt)
SAP Grants Management
Manage programs from pre-award to post-award and reporting
Strategic Sourcing
Sourcing Capabilities (RFX and auctions)
Strategic Capabilities (spend analysis, supplier evaluation and contract mgmt.)
Supplier Relationship Management
Contract negotiation and management
Supplier management
Catalogue content mgmt
Self-service procurement
Plan driven procurement
Relationship monitoring
SRM Vendor Employee
Confirms goods delivered, services performed and enters invoices
Supplier Enablement
Order collaboration
Supplier registration
Supplier managed content
CRM* (Customer Relationship Management)
*although outside the scope of this project, CRM will provide additional functionality for the State as they move forward with other projects.
What is RFX
What is CRMWhat is RFX
What is CRM
6. Project Team
7. SCEIS Partnership Dramatic Changes in business processes:
The system is fully integrated. Entering of information one time makes that information available to other functions as appropriate, significantly reducing or eliminating multiple data entry, errors, etc.
Purchase requisitions are now created online, eliminating paper documents for procurement requisitions.
Transactions are now electronically routed to approving authorities rather than paper documents. Electronic “approvals” are attached to these transactions and are electronically/automatically forwarded to the next step in the process. The system automatically routes transactions to responsible parties for approvals. Mandatory approvals of areas such as Information Technology, Grants Office, and other required approvals cannot be circumvented.
Transmission of documents from one stage of the process to another is virtually instantaneous.
Transaction approvals are now verified electronically through security measures implemented within the SAP configuration. Manual signature verification is eliminated.
When purchase requisitions are created online, the SAP system automatically verifies the correctness of much data such as item descriptions, part numbers, units of measure, budget availability, etc. Correctness of this data was previously performed on a manual basis.
At the time a purchase requisition is entered into the system, budget funds are immediately encumbered. The legacy systems did not encumber funds until the purchase order was actually issued.
A single purchase order document is now utilized for goods and services. The legacy systems issued various types of documents for different types of purchases.
All records are electronic and readily available on-line and in real-time. Legacy systems required multiple copies of paper documents to be maintained and filed in support of the transactions. Locating purchase orders or other procurement documents is almost instant rather than searching through filing cabinets.
Data is now collected online for mandatory reporting requirements and reporting documents are automatically populated with collected data. With legacy systems, it was necessary to manually collect data for various reporting requirements.
Data searches are now more simplified.
If changes to purchasing documents are required these can be accomplished in real time and online.
All records are real time and up to the minute upon entering data.
Receiving reports are entered online. Previously receiving reports were a manual process, requiring mailing of multiple documents to various areas.
A 3-way comparison of 1) invoices 2) purchase orders and 3) receiving reports is now performed electronically for items acquired by purchase order. Legacy systems required these documents to be manually matched in order to pay invoices.
Procurement personnel now have the ability to “audit” procurements via electronic means (PC’s and the SAP system) rather than travel to remote sites to inspect paper documentation.
Bulk buying and storing power, results in lower delivery costs for fewer and larger deliveries.
Items purchased, quantities, vendors, cost, and a host of other information is now readily available, enabling procurement to better manage items purchased, vendors, cost, inventory, etc.
End users can now access on-line purchase requisition or purchase order status, receiving information, or payment information without having to call the Procurement or Finance Offices.
Better budgetary controls – End users can only access assigned funding resulting in fewer if any errors due to erroneous coding of budgetary information. Previous systems were not designed to “catch” erroneous budget codes and allowed for unapproved spending from budgets of other areas.
A standard coding system (NIGP) is used to identify commodities and services purchased by DMH allowing for easier and quicker review/management of these resources.
Purchase requisitions entered by end users are automatically compared to commodities and services available on agency and State term contracts and, when appropriate, this information can be electronically copied into the requisition, saving a significant amount of time and ensuring that DMH receives the lowest possible prices. Dramatic Changes in business processes:
The system is fully integrated. Entering of information one time makes that information available to other functions as appropriate, significantly reducing or eliminating multiple data entry, errors, etc.
Purchase requisitions are now created online, eliminating paper documents for procurement requisitions.
Transactions are now electronically routed to approving authorities rather than paper documents. Electronic “approvals” are attached to these transactions and are electronically/automatically forwarded to the next step in the process. The system automatically routes transactions to responsible parties for approvals. Mandatory approvals of areas such as Information Technology, Grants Office, and other required approvals cannot be circumvented.
Transmission of documents from one stage of the process to another is virtually instantaneous.
Transaction approvals are now verified electronically through security measures implemented within the SAP configuration. Manual signature verification is eliminated.
When purchase requisitions are created online, the SAP system automatically verifies the correctness of much data such as item descriptions, part numbers, units of measure, budget availability, etc. Correctness of this data was previously performed on a manual basis.
At the time a purchase requisition is entered into the system, budget funds are immediately encumbered. The legacy systems did not encumber funds until the purchase order was actually issued.
A single purchase order document is now utilized for goods and services. The legacy systems issued various types of documents for different types of purchases.
All records are electronic and readily available on-line and in real-time. Legacy systems required multiple copies of paper documents to be maintained and filed in support of the transactions. Locating purchase orders or other procurement documents is almost instant rather than searching through filing cabinets.
Data is now collected online for mandatory reporting requirements and reporting documents are automatically populated with collected data. With legacy systems, it was necessary to manually collect data for various reporting requirements.
Data searches are now more simplified.
If changes to purchasing documents are required these can be accomplished in real time and online.
All records are real time and up to the minute upon entering data.
Receiving reports are entered online. Previously receiving reports were a manual process, requiring mailing of multiple documents to various areas.
A 3-way comparison of 1) invoices 2) purchase orders and 3) receiving reports is now performed electronically for items acquired by purchase order. Legacy systems required these documents to be manually matched in order to pay invoices.
Procurement personnel now have the ability to “audit” procurements via electronic means (PC’s and the SAP system) rather than travel to remote sites to inspect paper documentation.
Bulk buying and storing power, results in lower delivery costs for fewer and larger deliveries.
Items purchased, quantities, vendors, cost, and a host of other information is now readily available, enabling procurement to better manage items purchased, vendors, cost, inventory, etc.
End users can now access on-line purchase requisition or purchase order status, receiving information, or payment information without having to call the Procurement or Finance Offices.
Better budgetary controls – End users can only access assigned funding resulting in fewer if any errors due to erroneous coding of budgetary information. Previous systems were not designed to “catch” erroneous budget codes and allowed for unapproved spending from budgets of other areas.
A standard coding system (NIGP) is used to identify commodities and services purchased by DMH allowing for easier and quicker review/management of these resources.
Purchase requisitions entered by end users are automatically compared to commodities and services available on agency and State term contracts and, when appropriate, this information can be electronically copied into the requisition, saving a significant amount of time and ensuring that DMH receives the lowest possible prices.
8. SCEIS Executive Oversight Committee “The SCEIS Oversight Committee will guide and coordinate SCEIS from a statewide strategic perspective. It will provide direct executive support for the project, including working with the executive and legislative leadership of the State to promote the project.”
Nat Kaminski, Comptroller General’s Office, (Chairman)
Steve Osborne, Budget and Control Board, (Vice Chairman)
Marshall Evans, Governor's Office
Frank Rainwater, State Treasurer’s Office
Brenda Hart, Senate Finance Committee
Ben Homeyer, House Ways and Means Committee
Chuck Fallaw, Chief Information Office
Marcia Adams, Department of Motor Vehicles
John Bourne, Department of Mental Health
Sheila Breitweiser, SC School for the Deaf and Blind
Harry Cooper, Department of Revenue
Wendell Price, Department of Social Services
9. Central Project Team
10. Implementation Support Provided By Central Staff
11. Timeline
12. SCEIS Rollout Template A template that outlines a conservative approach to minimize risk has been adopted. It involves producing an Enterprise Blueprint, Pilot Implementation, Central Government Implementation and finally bringing groups of agencies online in waves.
13. SCEIS Financials/Materials Management and Budgeting - Proposed Rollout Plan Three high level enterprise projects: Financials/Materials Management, Budgeting, and Human Resources/Payroll will be implemented at a central level and rolled out to the agencies in waves. In general, agencies will implement financials/materials management, and budgeting, followed by human resources and payroll. The timeline for the first two modules is as follows:
14. SCEIS Human Resources & PayrollProposed Rollout Plan The HR/PR plan calls for a pilot implementation of the central HR/PR systems and a representative agency. Followed by agency implementations 3-6 months waves coordinated with their Financial implementation.
15. SCEIS Master Plan and Timeline
16. Costs
17. Statewide Implementation - Non-Recurring Costs
18. Statewide Implementation - Non-Recurring Costs
19. Proposed Cost Allocation Methodology Total estimate one-time costs to implement SCEIS statewide is $62.8 million
The costs will be allocated with 25% paid centrally and 75% funded by the agencies
$15.7 million of these costs will be funded centrally
$47.1 million will be funded by state agencies
Agency Portion due at “Go Live” date
20. Statewide Implementation - Recurring Costs
21. Proposed Model for Allocation of Recurring Costs
22. Legislative Update
23. Legislative Actions FY 2005 – 2006 Budget Approved – New Funding
5,500,000 – Non Recurring Funds
1,826,000 – Additional Recurring Funds
SCEIS Related Provisos/Resolution
SCEIS Proviso (72.83)
SCEIS Agency Funds Proviso (72.103)
SCEIS Agency Funds Joint Resolution (H3799)
24. SCEIS Proviso 72.83 States the General Assembly’s mandate to implement SCEIS for all agencies with the exception of lump-sum agencies
Recognizes and empowers the SCEIS Oversight Committee
Requires agencies to implement SCEIS within the framework provided for in the Business Case Study
Allows for scope and implementation schedule issues to be handled by the SCEIS Oversight Committee
Provides for reporting to both the Executive and Legislative leadership
25. SCEIS Agency Fund Proviso 72.103and Joint Resolution H3799 Each agency can establish a Special Account for the sole purpose of funding non-recurring SCEIS implementation costs
Agency can transfer funds into this Special Account at the discretion of the agency head
Total funds transferred into this Account are specifically designated for SCEIS implementation and cannot exceed agency’s projected implementation costs
Account would be exempt from the calculation of any mid-year budget reduction
Unexpended balance in the Account would be carried forward from year-to-year until agency’s SCEIS implementation is completed
Account is monitored by the Comptroller General’s Office
JOINT RESOLUTION H3799 pending to allow 2004-2005 Funds to be allocated
26. Next Steps - Agency Agency will be provided updated implementation cost information before end of current FY
Determine any FY05 funds available for savings toward implementation costs
pending Joint Resolution H3799 approval
Identify internal team to organize and manage Agency’s SAP implementation including a primary contact point for the Enterprise Support Group – HR/PR Blueprint to begin Jan 2006.
Identify Agency requirements and develop any questions concerning the scope of SAP Project (i.e., functionality, reports, interfaces with other systems, etc.)
27. Contact SCEIS WEBSITE: www.sceis.sc.gov
Email: sceis@sceis.sc.gov
Pat O’Cain, Project Director - CG pocain@cg.state.sc.us
Chuck Fallaw, Project Director – CIO fallaw@cio.sc.gov
Jim Sexton, Program Manager jsexton@sceis.sc.gov
28. Questions & Answers