800 likes | 986 Views
Sez who?. The need for attribution!. Affect or effect?. Affect: a verb Effect: a noun. Affect or effect?. Affect: a verb Effect: a noun “The lack of attribution affected the teacher and the subsequent effect on Arnold’s grade was devastating.”. Two tough questions we must ask.
E N D
Sez who? The need for attribution!
Affect or effect? • Affect: a verb • Effect: a noun
Affect or effect? • Affect: a verb • Effect: a noun • “The lack of attribution affected the teacher and the subsequent effect on Arnold’s grade was devastating.”
Is capitalism Christian? • Remember consequences, not intent: rent control was supposed to help the poor
Is capitalism Christian? • Remember consequences, not intent: rent control was supposed to help the poor • The first thing communists and fascists do is eliminate or marginalize religion: Stalin, Lenin, Castro, Mao, Hitler
Is capitalism Christian? • Remember consequences, not intent: rent control was supposed to help the poor • The first thing communists and fascists do is eliminate or marginalize religion: Stalin, Lenin, Castro, Mao, Hitler • In socialism, the state becomes the religion
Is capitalism Christian? • Remember consequences, not intent: rent control was supposed to help the poor • The first thing communists and fascists do is eliminate or marginalize religion: Stalin, Lenin, Castro, Mao, Hitler • In socialism, the state becomes the religion • Nowhere in the Bible do I see where it is the duty of the state to care for the poor… it is the individual and the church
Is capitalism Christian? • Christians are the most generous people in the world… and most are capitalists
Is capitalism Christian? • Christians are the most generous people in the world… and most are capitalists • Christ’s teachings about caring for the poor are all about a changed heart… not about your money being taken by the state and given to others
Is capitalism Christian? • Christians are the most generous people in the world… and most are capitalists • Christ’s teaching about caring for the poor are all about a changed heart… not about your money being taken by the state and given to others • The Bible gives us no explicit economic system, but it seems clear to me capitalism is much more in line with Christianity than socialism
Karl Marx “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness.”
Zero sum thinking • Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing match
Zero sum thinking • Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing match • So if Bill Gates is rich, he must have taken that wealth from others
Zero sum thinking • Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing match • So if Bill Gates is rich, he must have taken that wealth from others • The economic pie is only so big, so government has to make sure we all get the same size slice… “fairness” and “social justice”
Zero sum thinking • Does not recognize how much wealth Bill has created for others… e.g., the increased productivity from using Microsoft Office
Zero sum thinking • Does not recognize how much wealth Bill has created for others… e.g., the increased productivity from using Microsoft Office • Free-market thinkers want the pie to grow bigger… rising tide floating all boats
Zero sum thinking • Seen today in discussions of how rich are getting a larger share of the economy, and how CEO pay is now 250 times that of the average worker, versus 50 times in the 1960s
Zero sum thinking • Seen today in discussions of how rich are getting a larger share of the economy, and how CEO pay is now 250 times that of the average worker, versus 50 times in the 1960s • Ignores the fact that the average worker is living much better than ever
Zero sum thinking • Seen today in discussions of how rich are getting a larger share of the economy, and how CEO pay is now 250 times that of the average worker, versus 50 times in the 1960s • Ignores the fact that the average worker is living much better than ever • Used to argue against free markets and international trade, and for minimum wage, price controls, “paycheck fairness” act
Zero sum thinking • Liberal economists in general want to make the pie more equal through government interventions and redistribution of wealth
Zero sum thinking • Liberal economists in general want to make the pie more equal through government interventions and redistribution of wealth • Free-market economists in general want the pie to keep growing through the free marketand supply and demand
Zero sum thinking • Liberal economists want equality of outcomes… i.e., everyone makes about the same through government redistribution
Zero sum thinking • Liberal economists want equality of outcomes… i.e., everyone makes about the same through government redistribution • Free-market economists want equality of opportunity… everyone has an equal chance to succeed
Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) • 20,000 pages of regulations and counting • Ithasn’t gone into effect yet • CBO estimates it will add $6.2 trillion to debt
Fallacy of composition • The mistaken assumption that what applies to a part applies to the whole
Fallacy of composition • The mistaken assumption that what applies to a part applies to the whole • In economics, we’re looking at the economy in total… not any given individual, company or industry
Fallacy of composition • The mistaken assumption that what applies to a part applies to the whole • In economics, we’re looking at the economy in total… not any given individual, company or industry • We know that the economy is dynamic… some companies and industries must pass (typesetters, milkmen) so others can rise (app developers, organic bakers)
Fallacy of composition • Most common when government intervenes to “save jobs” such as the taxpayer bail out of GM and Chrysler
Fallacy of composition • Most common when government intervenes to “save jobs” such as the taxpayer bail out of GM and Chrysler • Said to “save” 1 million jobs… at a cost of $80 billion of taxpayer money, and locked in GM and Chrysler’s pension obligations and high fixed costs
Fallacy of composition • Most common when government intervenes to “save jobs” such as the taxpayer bail out of GM and Chrysler • Said to “save” 1 million jobs… at a cost of $80 billion of taxpayer money, and locked in GM and Chrysler’s pension obligations and high fixed costs • More important: what has been the cost to the rest of the economy in lost jobs and opportunities?
“Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, darn* lies and statistics.’" *Teacher’s edit
Measuring National Output • More common measure is GDP: gross domestic product
Gross Domestic Product • The sum total of all goods and services produced within a nation’s borders including by foreign nationals during a year
Gross Domestic Product • The sum total of all goods and services produced within a nation’s borders including by foreign nationals during a year • GDP is the preferred measurement of contemporary economists, used by the U.S. since 1992
The two main components of GDP • Private consumption and public sector spending
The two main components of GDP • Private consumption and public sector spending • In 2012, U.S. GDP was $15.7 trillion