230 likes | 461 Views
Georgia’s Healthy Collections Initiative. SAA Annual Conference Austin, TX Aug. 13, 2009. Georgia Archives Georgia Association of Museums and Galleries (GAMG) Georgia Department of Economic Development Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) Georgia Humanities Council
E N D
Georgia’s Healthy Collections Initiative SAA Annual Conference Austin, TX Aug. 13, 2009 Georgia Archives Georgia Association of Museums and Galleries (GAMG) Georgia Department of Economic Development Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) Georgia Humanities Council Georgia Public Library Service Historic Preservation Division, Department of Natural Resources Lyrasis Society of Georgia Archivists (SGA)
Project Goals • Identify all collections-holding institutions in Georgia • Expand the Georgia Archives’ online Historical & Cultural Organizations Directory • Develop and test a survey instrument to assess collections care and emergency preparedness • Incorporate a stair-step chart so repositories can track their level of collections care
Characteristics of Institutions Surveyed • Total population of 643 organizations in database; test sent to 117 • 84 institutions completed survey • 72% return • Six major institution types • Size: small/medium/large • Determined by overall budget size
Types of Institutions Surveyed(primary function/service) • Archives (12) • Public Libraries (15) • Academic Libraries (16) • Historical Societies (7) • Museums (29) • Archaeological Repositories/Scientific Research Collections (0)
Institutional Size • Determined by budget • Small <$500,000 • Medium $500,000 to $5 million • Large >$5 million
Preservation Stair-Step • 19 out of the 60 survey questions were designed as “Stair-Step” questions Step 4: Comprehensive Step 3: Advanced Step 2: Basic Step 1: Minimal
Preservation Stair-Step Levels • Step 1: Establishing Preservation Awareness There is minimal preservation activity, and the institution is just beginning to develop an awareness of preservation needs.
Preservation Stair-Step Levels • Step 2: Building a Basic Preservation Program Some activities in place including environmental & light controls, emergency planning, staff awareness, but no formal planning has been done.
Preservation Stair-Step Levels • Step 3: Advancing Preservation Within Your Organization More formal planning efforts have been undertaken and resources are allocated to preservation; as well as ongoing activities in various categories
Preservation Stair-Step Levels • Step 4: Achieving Comprehensive Preservation of Collections Well-established program that addresses all major preservation needs and issues; trained staff, formal planning, allocated resources, grants obtained
Stair-Step Categories • Intellectual Control • Preservation Management • Environmental Control • Emergency Planning • Collections Care • Expenditures and Funding • Advocacy and Training
Importance Survey • Survey sent to advisory committee and colleagues • Participants asked to rate overall categories AND individual questions (Stair-Step questions only) • Results confirmed existing weighting, with the exception of Collections Care
Stair-Step Results • Step 1 (.50 - 1.59) 1 institution • Step 2 (1.60 – 2.59) 48 institutions • Step 3 (2.60 - 3.59) 29 institutions • Step 4 (3.60 – 4.00) 1 institution
Institutional Reports • Customized report with their overall stair-step level, and the level for each section • Boiler plate overview of each category with bulleted recommendations that that corresponds to stair-step • Links to resources embedded in report • Planning phase – reports generated manually
Test Survey Overall Results • Majority have less than 2 FTE staff devoted to preservation • Only 18.5% have line item for preservation in their budget • 64% have done no formal preservation planning • 25% have a disaster plan that has been updated in the past year
Test Survey Overall Results • 73% have standard HVAC, but only 16% monitor conditions regularly • Training needs: Most preferred face-to- face training over online • Preservation priorities • Funding and staffing • Long range planning • Disaster planning
Ideas for Implementation • Open survey/assessment to all organizations • Automate survey and reports • Expand statewide Directory to include GIS data; import data into existing statewide GIS systems for EM purposes
Ideas for Implementation • Identify “lead” organizations in each of the state’s 15 regions to help mentor others • Match needs according to stair-step • Site visits to Step One orgs • Training for Step Two orgs • Grant writing assistance for Step Three orgs
Lessons Learned • Identifying organizations and maintaining contact data is an ongoing challenge • Incentives help to increase survey response rate • Disaster Wheels, Field Guides, Reports • Testing first helped focus and refine survey questions
For More Information Christine Wiseman Preservation Services ManagerGeorgia Archivescwiseman@sos.ga.gov 678-364-3761 http://www.sos.ga.gov/archives/Healthy_Collections_Initiative/default.htm