280 likes | 377 Views
Securitization and Other Instruments for Transferring Risk to the Capital Markets. Rick Gorvett, FCAS, MAAA, ARM, FRM, Ph.D. Actuarial Science Program University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Washington, DC July, 2003. Agenda. Historical background of securitization
E N D
Securitization and Other Instruments for Transferring Risk to the Capital Markets Rick Gorvett, FCAS, MAAA, ARM, FRM, Ph.D. Actuarial Science Program University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Washington, DC July, 2003
Agenda • Historical background of securitization • Definition and evolution of insurance securitization • Types of securitized insurance instruments • Recent activity • Issues for the future
Terminology and Tools • Financial terminology • We need to learn to quack before we can be a duck • Financial practitioners say things like “BB undefeased subordinated debenture at 6mLIBOR+350bps” • Financial tools • Financial practitioners use tools with names like “options,” “swaps,” “swaptions”
Securitization inHistorical Perspective • Home mortgage market: funding shortfall in the late 1970s • Market response: • Change tax laws: no double taxation on cash flow pass-throughs • Modernized investment technology • FNMA, Freddie Mac • Other asset-backed securities developed subsequently • Auto loans • Credit card receivables • David Bowie albums
The Securitization Process • Participants • Demanders of funds • Homeowner / borrower of funds • Bank / Loan originator • Special purpose entity / trust • Suppliers of funds • Underwriter / investment bank • Capital markets / investors • Some of the Benefits • Liquidity • Market values • Lower cost
Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBSs) • Originated in response to mortgage funding shortfall • Mortgages are “securitized” by packaging mortgage loans and selling the cash flows as securities • The mortgage-backed securities represent ownership in the mortgages • Mortgages generally have an embedded option: to prepay the mortgage (in event of interest rates falling, mortgage-holder moving, etc.)
Mortgage-Backed Securities (cont.) • Investors receive the monthly mortgage payments (principal and/or interest) paid by the mortgage borrowers • With MBSs, the prepayment risk is transferred to the capital market investors • Investors are compensated for this risk by sufficiently high yields on the securities
What is “Securitization of Insurance Risk”? • Insurance company transfers underwriting risks to the capital markets by transforming underwriting cash flows into tradable financial securities • Cash flows (e.g., repayment of interest and/or principal) are contingent upon an insurance event / risk
Evolution of the Insurance Industry “Affronts” to Traditional Insurance • Self-insurance • Captives • Risk retention groups and purchasing groups • Insurance securitization • Portfolio insurance
Factors Affecting the Recent Development of Insurance Securitization • Recent catastrophe experience • Reassessment of catastrophe risk • Demand for and pricing of reinsurance • Reinsurance supply issues • Capital market developments • Development of new asset classes and asset-backed markets • Search for yield and diversification • Restructuring of insurance industry
Possible Reasons for Securitizing Insurance Risks • Capacity • Risk of huge catastrophe losses • Would severely impair P/C industry capital • Capital markets could handle • Investment • Catastrophe exposure is uncorrelated with overall capital markets • Thus, uncorrelated with existing portfolios • Diversification potential
Risks Which P/C Insurers Face • Underwriting • Loss experience: frequency and severity • Underwriting cycle • Inflation • Payout patterns • Catastrophes • Investment • Interest rate risk • Capital market performance All of these risks can prevent a company from meeting its objectives
What to Securitize? • Homeowners? Auto? Health? • “Homeowners is not a problem for the insurance industry. Auto is not a problem for the insurance industry. We know how to manage those risks…. How about catastrophes?” - Dennis Chookaszian (a 1992 comment, quoted in Best’s Review, 4/99)
Types of Insurance Instruments • Those that transfer risk • Reinsurance • Exchange-traded derivatives • Swaps • Catastrophe bonds • Those that provide contingent capital • Letter of credit • Contingent surplus notes • Catastrophe equity puts
Exchange-Traded Derivatives • Chicago Board of Trade • Option spreads ~ reinsurance • PCS: daily index values • Nine geographic products • Bermuda Commodities Exchange • Binary options • Guy Carpenter Catastrophe Index • Seven geographic products
Risk Exchanges and Swaps • CATEX New York • Electronic bulletin board • Intermediary • CATEX Bermuda • Joint venture: CATEX and Bermuda Stock Exchange • Swaps
Some Early Successful Bond Issues • USAA: company’s hurricane losses • Swiss Re: industry’s California E/Q losses • Tokio Marine & Fire: Tokyo E/Q magnitude • Centre Re: company’s Florida hurricane losses • Yasuda Fire & Marine: typhoon losses
Early Successes • USAA / Residential Re • Size: $477M, in two tranches • Trigger: hurricane losses to company • Coverage: 80% of $500M x/s $1B co. loss • A-1: rated AAA • $163.8M, of which $77M placed in a defeasance account to fund principal repayment • Only interest at risk • Coupon: LIBOR + 282 bps • A-2: rated BB • $313.2M • Both principal and interest at risk • Coupon: LIBOR + 575 bps
Early Successes (cont.) • Swiss Re • Size: $137M, in three classes • Trigger: losses to industry from CA E/Q; industry insured loss, from a single event, greater than $18.5B triggers principal write-downs • 40% of Class A proceeds to defeasance account • Coupon: • A-1: LIBOR + 255 bps • A-2: 8.645% • B: 10.493% • C: 12%
Early Successes (cont.) • Tokio / Parametric Re • Size: $100M, in two tranches • Trigger: Tokyo earthquake magnitude; a Japanese Meteorological Association magnitude rating of 7.1 or more involves loss of part or all of principal • Half of $20M proceeds from A and all of $80M proceeds from B are risk capital • Ten-year term • Coupon: • A: LIBOR + 206 bps • B: LIBOR + 430 bps
Early Successes (cont.) • Centre / Trinity Re • Size: $84M, in two tranches • Trigger: FL hurricane losses to company • Class A-1 notes ($22M in proceeds) provide for full principal repayment in event of a loss • Coupon: • A-1: LIBOR + 182 bps • A-2: LIBOR + 436 bps
Early Successes (cont.) • Yasuda Fire and Marine • Typhoon losses • $80 million offering • 5-7 years • Attachment point recalculated every year with exposure model -- constant 0.94% chance of loss to investors • Guaranteed limits and pricing for a second event
Generally Common Traits of Early Successful Issues • Involve catastrophe risk • High levels of protection • Relatively short maturities • Some protection of principal included • High coupon rates Trend is now toward longer (e.g., 3-year versus annual) Associated with “newness”
“Costs” of Cat Bonds • High yields • Default premiums may be high for a time • Setting up SPV • Investment banking fees • Advising • Spread • Legal fees
Contingent Capital • Contingent surplus notes • Option to borrow, contingent upon some event or trigger • Right to issue surplus notes • Catastrophe equity puts • Put option (right to sell) • Right to issue shares of stock, contingent upon some event or trigger
Very Recent Activity • Approximately $1.22 billion issued in the 2002 cat bond market • Versus $1.14 billion in 2000 • Notable transactions: • USAA / Residential Re: Sixth consecutive year • Vivendi / Studio Re: First direct-corporate issue on US peril • Several catastrophe bond investment funds
Issues Regarding the Potential “Success” of Insurance Securitization • Need to understand two markets • Capital markets • Insurance markets • Separation of insurance and finance functions in many companies • Information and technology • Pricing challenges • Cost (vs. cat. reinsurance market) • Legal / tax / accounting issues